• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

九基因检测 panel 在辅助细针穿刺细胞学诊断甲状腺癌中的应用

[Application of 9-gene panel in assisting fine needle aspiration cytology to diagnose thyroid cancer].

作者信息

Zhang Y Q, Zhao H, Zhao L L, Sun Y, Wang C, Zhang Z H, Qiu T, Yang X, Xiao T, Guo H Q

机构信息

Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing100021, China.

State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Etiology and Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing100021, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2024 Nov 23;46(11):1049-1057. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240225-00084.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240225-00084
PMID:39622737
Abstract

To evaluate the utility of the 9-gene panel as a differential diagnostic method for thyroid nodules within determinate cytological diagnosis and as a parallel diagnostic method for thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology. 579 liquid-based cytology samples from 544 patients were collected after thyroid FNA diagnosis in our hospital from December 2014 to April 2021. Mutations at any site of 9 genes, namely, BRAF, NRAS, HRAS, KRAS, GNAS, RET, TERT, TP53, and PIK3CA as recorded by the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC), were analyzed by next-generation sequencing. Taking postoperative histopathology and cytology results with definite benign or malignant diagnosis as the gold standard, the diagnostic efficacy of the 9-gene panel as a reclassified method for thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytological diagnosis and as a parallel diagnostic method for thyroid FNA cytology were evaluated and compared with that of the BRAF V600E single-gene detection method. Of the 579 thyroid nodules, 196 (33.85%) were Bethesda Ⅱ, 11 (1.90%) were Bethesda Ⅲ, 31 (5.35%) were Bethesda Ⅳ, 27 (4.66%) were Bethesda Ⅴ, and 314 (54.23%) were Bethesda Ⅵ, as diagnosed by thyroid FNA cytology. Among these 579 thyroid nodules, 275 were tested positive for 9-gene mutations, with a mutation rate of 47.5%. Of the 329 thyroid nodules surgically removed, 30 (9.12%) were benign, 5 (1.52%) were borderline, and 294 (89.36%) were malignant. Regarding borderline nodules as malignant nodules, the mutation rates of the 9 genes in the 299 malignant thyroid nodules from high to low were BRAF 62.21% (186/299), NRAS 5.02% (15/299), HRAS 1.00% (3/299), PIK3CA 0.67% (2/299), GNAS 0.67% (2/299), KRAS 0.33% (1/299), TP53 0.33% (1/299), TERT 0.33% (1/299) and RET 0.00% (0/299). The malignant risks of the 9 genes from high to low were BRAF 100% (186/186), PIK3CA 100.00% (2/2), GNAS 100.00% (2/2), TERT 100.00% (1/1), TP53 100.00% (1/1), NRAS 78.95% (15/19), HRAS 75.00% (3/4), and KRAS 50.00% (1/2). For thyroid nodules of Bethesda Ⅲ-Ⅳ (indeterminate diagnosis), the sensitivity (SN) of the 9-gene panel in diagnosing thyroid cancer is 34.48% (10/29), the specificity (SP) is 61.54% (8/13), and the accuracy is 42.86% (18/42); whereas the SN of the BRAF V600E detection method is 0%. Therefore, the diagnostic efficiency of the 9-gene panel is significantly better than that of BRAF V600E single gene detection. For thyroid nodules of Bethesda Ⅱ-Ⅵ, the SN of the 9-gene panel in diagnosing thyroid cancer was 68.83% (254/369), the SP was 90.00% (189/210), the accuracy was 76.51% (443/579), and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.79; whereas the SN of BRAF V600E single-gene detection in diagnosing thyroid cancer was 63.69% (235/369), the SP was 99.52% (209/210), the accuracy was 76.68% (444/579), and the AUC was 0.82. The SP of BRAF V600E detection is higher than that of the 9-gene panel (<0.01), but there is no significant difference in SN, accuracy (both >0.05), and AUC (=0.85, =0.396) between them. Gene mutations indicating poor prognosis were detected in 4 nodules of papillary thyroid carcinoma and 1 nodules of follicular thyroid carcinoma, including 2 nodules with TERT and BRAF V600E co-mutations, 1 nodule with TP53 mutation, and 2 nodules with PIK3CA mutation. As a reclassified method for thyroid lesions with indeterminate cytological diagnosis, the 9-gene panel is better than BRAF V600E single gene detection. As a parallel diagnostic method of thyroid FNA cytology, the 9-gene panel has similar diagnostic efficacy as BRAF V600E single-gene detection. The 9-gene panel can detect individual cases with gene mutations indicating poor prognosis. The identification of patients with these special gene mutations has certain implications for the clinical management of them.

摘要

评估9基因检测 panel作为甲状腺结节在明确细胞学诊断中的鉴别诊断方法以及作为甲状腺细针穿刺(FNA)细胞学的平行诊断方法的效用。2014年12月至2021年4月期间,在我院对544例患者进行甲状腺FNA诊断后,收集了579份液基细胞学样本。通过下一代测序分析癌症体细胞突变目录(COSMIC)记录的9个基因(即BRAF、NRAS、HRAS、KRAS、GNAS、RET、TERT、TP53和PIK3CA)在任何位点的突变情况。以术后组织病理学和明确良性或恶性诊断的细胞学结果作为金标准,评估9基因检测 panel作为甲状腺结节不确定细胞学诊断的重新分类方法以及作为甲状腺FNA细胞学平行诊断方法的诊断效能,并与BRAF V600E单基因检测方法进行比较。在579个甲状腺结节中,甲状腺FNA细胞学诊断为BethesdaⅡ级的有196个(33.85%),BethesdaⅢ级的有11个(1.90%),BethesdaⅣ级的有31个(5.35%),BethesdaⅤ级的有27个(4.66%),BethesdaⅥ级的有314个(54.23%)。在这579个甲状腺结节中,275个9基因检测呈阳性,突变率为47.5%。在329个手术切除的甲状腺结节中,良性的有30个(9.12%),交界性的有5个(1.52%),恶性的有294个(89.36%)。将交界性结节视为恶性结节,299个恶性甲状腺结节中9个基因的突变率从高到低依次为BRAF 62.21%(186/299)、NRAS 5.02%(15/299)、HRAS 1.00%(3/299)、PIK3CA 0.67%(2/299)、GNAS 0.67%(2/299)、KRAS 0.33%(1/299)、TP53 0.33%(1/299)、TERT 0.33%(1/299)和RET 0.00%(0/299)。9个基因的恶性风险从高到低依次为BRAF 100%(186/186)、PIK3CA 100.00%(2/2)、GNAS 100.00%(2/2)、TERT 100.00%(1/1)、TP53 100.00%(1/1)、NRAS 78.95%(15/19)、HRAS 75.00%(3/4)和KRAS 50.00%(1/2)。对于BethesdaⅢ-Ⅳ级(诊断不确定)的甲状腺结节,9基因检测 panel诊断甲状腺癌的敏感性(SN)为34.48%(10/29),特异性(SP)为61.54%(8/13),准确性为42.86%(18/42);而BRAF V600E检测方法的SN为0%。因此,9基因检测 panel的诊断效率明显优于BRAF V600E单基因检测。对于BethesdaⅡ-Ⅵ级的甲状腺结节,9基因检测 panel诊断甲状腺癌的SN为68.83%(254/369),SP为90.00%(189/210),准确性为76.51%(443/579),曲线下面积(AUC)为0.79;而BRAF V600E单基因检测诊断甲状腺癌的SN为63.69%(235/369),SP为99.52%(209/210),准确性为76.68%(444/579),AUC为0.82。BRAF V600E检测的SP高于9基因检测 panel(<0.01),但它们之间的SN、准确性(均>0.05)和AUC(=0.85,=0.396)无显著差异。在4例甲状腺乳头状癌和1例甲状腺滤泡癌结节中检测到提示预后不良的基因突变,其中2例为TERT和BRAF V600E共突变,1例为TP53突变,2例为PIK3CA突变。作为甲状腺病变不确定细胞学诊断的重新分类方法,9基因检测 panel优于BRAF V600E单基因检测。作为甲状腺FNA细胞学的平行诊断方法,9基因检测 panel与BRAF V600E单基因检测具有相似的诊断效能。9基因检测 panel可以检测出具有提示预后不良基因突变的个体病例。识别这些具有特殊基因突变的患者对其临床管理具有一定意义。

相似文献

1
[Application of 9-gene panel in assisting fine needle aspiration cytology to diagnose thyroid cancer].九基因检测 panel 在辅助细针穿刺细胞学诊断甲状腺癌中的应用
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2024 Nov 23;46(11):1049-1057. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240225-00084.
2
A five-gene panel refines differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules.五基因检测 panel 可改善甲状腺结节的鉴别诊断。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2021 Sep;35(9):e23920. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23920. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
3
[Multi-gene mutations in ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration specimens of thyroid micronodules and diagnostic value in thyroid microcarcinomas using next-generation sequencing].[甲状腺微小癌超声引导下细针穿刺标本多基因变异及二代测序对甲状腺微小癌的诊断价值]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Oct 15;104(38):3580-3585. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240628-01445.
4
The Combined Use of Fine-Needle Aspiration (FNA) and BRAF V600E Gene Testing: Can it Increase the Definitive Diagnosis Rate of Nodules Categorized as Bethesda III for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma?细针穿刺抽吸(FNA)与 BRAF V600E 基因检测联合应用:是否能提高甲状腺乳头状癌 Bethesda III 类结节的明确诊断率?
Am Surg. 2024 Dec;90(12):3209-3215. doi: 10.1177/00031348241265143. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
5
Discriminating Interpatient Variabilities of RAS Gene Variants for Precision Detection of Thyroid Cancer.鉴别 RAS 基因突变的患者间差异,以精准检测甲状腺癌。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2411919. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.11919.
6
Real-life utility of five-gene panel test in preoperative thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy: a large cohort of 740 patients study.五基因检测面板在甲状腺细针抽吸活检术前的实际应用:一项 740 例患者的大样本队列研究。
Endocrine. 2023 Jun;80(3):552-562. doi: 10.1007/s12020-022-03286-3. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
7
BRAF mutation test on fine-needle aspiration specimens of thyroid nodules: Clinical correlations for 4600 patients.甲状腺结节细针抽吸标本 BRAF 基因突变检测:4600 例患者的临床相关性。
Cancer Med. 2022 Jan;11(1):40-49. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4419. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
8
Diagnostic Value and Challenges of BRAF V600E Molecular Testing and Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology: A Retrospective Study from a Tertiary Institution in Southern Hunan Province, China.中国湘南地区一家三级医院的回顾性研究:BRAF V600E 分子检测和甲状腺细针抽吸细胞学诊断价值及挑战
Acta Cytol. 2023;67(6):629-638. doi: 10.1159/000534138. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
9
Detection of driver mutations in plasma cell-free nucleic acids in differentiated thyroid neoplasm.分化型甲状腺肿瘤中浆细胞游离核酸驱动突变的检测
Eur J Endocrinol. 2023 Jan 10;188(1). doi: 10.1093/ejendo/lvac018.
10
Assessment of molecular testing in fine-needle aspiration biopsy samples: an experience in a Chinese population.细针穿刺活检样本中分子检测的评估:中国人群的经验
Exp Mol Pathol. 2014 Oct;97(2):292-7. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Aug 8.