• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用棉卷和橡皮障隔离技术对窝沟封闭剂保留率的比较评估——一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Comparative evaluation of pit & fissure sealant retention using cotton roll & rubber dam isolation techniques - a systematic review & meta-analysis.

作者信息

Shukla Neha, Akram Zainab, Kumar P G Naveen, Khairnar Mahesh R, Jadhav Sachin Kumar, Priyadarsini Savitha

机构信息

Faculty of Dental Sciences, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Evid Based Dent. 2025 Jun;26(2):112. doi: 10.1038/s41432-024-01092-6. Epub 2024 Dec 2.

DOI:10.1038/s41432-024-01092-6
PMID:39622909
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Isolation with cotton rolls does not always provide as complete isolation as rubber dam, especially in procedures where absolute moisture control is critical. Therefore, this review aims to summarize and analyze previous studies evaluating the retention and marginal integrity of pit & fissure sealant using rubber dam and cotton roll isolation techniques during dental treatment in children.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, search yielded 1361 articles, with seven RCTs and one non-RCT design meeting the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted on study design, sample size, sealant type, follow-up duration, retention rates, and caries incidence.

RESULTS

The comparison of retention rate between rubber dam and cotton roll at six months difference was non-significant (OR:1.15; p = 0.64) while there was significant difference at 12 month (OR:2.23; p < 0.001). The difference for the marginal integrity was statistically significant at six months (OR:2.00; p = 0.03) while non-significant difference observed (OR:1.74; p = 0.10) at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

The sealant placed using a rubber dam as an isolation technique showed higher retention than the cotton roll after 12 months. In terms of marginal integrity, the performance of the rubber dam and cotton roll was equivalent at the end of 12 months.

摘要

背景

使用棉卷隔离并不总能像使用橡皮障那样提供完全的隔离效果,尤其是在对绝对湿度控制要求严格的操作中。因此,本综述旨在总结和分析以往评估儿童牙科治疗期间使用橡皮障和棉卷隔离技术时窝沟封闭剂的保留率和边缘完整性的研究。

材料与方法

按照PRISMA指南进行检索,共获得1361篇文章,其中7项随机对照试验和1项非随机对照试验设计符合纳入标准。提取了关于研究设计、样本量、封闭剂类型、随访时间、保留率和龋齿发病率的数据。

结果

橡皮障和棉卷在6个月时保留率的比较差异无统计学意义(OR:1.15;p = 0.64),而在12个月时有显著差异(OR:2.23;p < 0.001)。边缘完整性在6个月时差异有统计学意义(OR:2.00;p = 0.03),而在12个月时差异无统计学意义(OR:1.74;p = 0.10)。

结论

使用橡皮障作为隔离技术放置的封闭剂在12个月后显示出比棉卷更高的保留率。在边缘完整性方面,橡皮障和棉卷在12个月末的表现相当。

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of pit & fissure sealant retention using cotton roll & rubber dam isolation techniques - a systematic review & meta-analysis.使用棉卷和橡皮障隔离技术对窝沟封闭剂保留率的比较评估——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Evid Based Dent. 2025 Jun;26(2):112. doi: 10.1038/s41432-024-01092-6. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
2
Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents.窝沟封闭剂与氟化物漆预防儿童和青少年恒牙龋齿的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 18;2016(1):CD003067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003067.pub4.
3
Sealants for preventing dental caries in primary teeth.窝沟封闭剂预防儿童乳牙龋齿。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 11;2(2):CD012981. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012981.pub2.
4
Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in permanent teeth.用于预防恒牙龋齿的窝沟封闭剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 31;7(7):CD001830. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001830.pub5.
5
Sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth.用于预防恒牙龋齿的窝沟封闭剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28(3):CD001830. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001830.pub4.
6
Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents.用于预防儿童和青少年恒牙龋齿的窝沟封闭剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(3):CD001830. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001830.pub2.
7
Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in children and adolescents.窝沟封闭剂与氟化物漆预防儿童和青少年龋齿的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD003067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003067.pub2.
8
Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents.用于预防儿童和青少年恒牙龋齿的窝沟封闭剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8(4):CD001830. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001830.pub3.
9
The effect of rubber dam on objective and subjective parameters of stress during dental treatment in children: a randomized clinical trial.橡皮障对儿童牙科治疗期间应激客观和主观参数的影响:一项随机临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 30;25(1):855. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06250-5.
10
Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions.治疗龋坏或牙本质龋损的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 19;7(7):CD013039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013039.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Sealant retention, patient satisfaction, and operator preference: a split-mouth randomised controlled trial comparing EasyPrep and cotton roll isolation in a dental school setting.封闭剂保留率、患者满意度及术者偏好:一项在牙科学校环境中比较EasyPrep和棉卷隔离法的口内对照随机试验。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2025 Sep 15. doi: 10.1007/s40368-025-01111-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical performance of sealants under different humidity control conditions: a split-mouth 1-year randomized trial.不同湿度控制条件下封闭剂的临床性能:一项为期 1 年的随机分口研究。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2023 Dec;24(6):769-777. doi: 10.1007/s40368-023-00843-w. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
2
A literature review of clinical efficiency, patient satisfaction, and future preference of Isolite and DryShield dental isolation systems among pediatric patients.一项关于 Isolite 和 DryShield 牙科隔离系统在儿科患者中的临床效率、患者满意度和未来偏好的文献综述。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Jul;47(4):1-8. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2023.029. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
3
Evaluation of fissure sealant retention rates using Isolite in comparison with rubber dam and cotton roll isolation techniques: A randomized clinical trial.
使用Isolite与橡皮障和棉卷隔离技术相比评估窝沟封闭剂保留率:一项随机临床试验。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2023 Jan;33(1):12-19. doi: 10.1111/ipd.13008. Epub 2022 May 22.
4
A Retrospective Audit of Dental Treatment Provided to Special Needs Patients under General Anesthesia During a Ten-Year Period.对十年间在全身麻醉下为特殊需求患者提供的牙科治疗的回顾性审计。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018;42(2):155-160. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-42.2.13. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
5
The success rates of a glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant placed by fifth-year undergraduate dental students.五年级牙科本科学生放置玻璃离子水门汀和树脂基窝沟封闭剂的成功率。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2012 Apr;13(2):94-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03262852.
6
Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.随机对照试验荟萃分析中检查和解释漏斗图不对称性的建议。
BMJ. 2011 Jul 22;343:d4002. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4002.
7
Effect of saliva contamination on microleakage of three different pit and fissure sealants.唾液污染对三种不同窝沟封闭剂微渗漏的影响。
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2010 Jun;11(2):93-6.
8
Comparison of caries prevention with glass ionomer and composite resin fissure sealants.玻璃离子体和复合树脂窝沟封闭剂预防龋齿的比较。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2009 Nov;108(11):844-8. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60415-0.
9
Retention and effectiveness of fissure sealants in Kuwaiti school children.科威特学童中窝沟封闭剂的保留率和有效性
Community Dent Health. 2008 Dec;25(4):211-5.
10
Effectiveness of primer and bond in sealant retention and caries prevention.底漆和粘结剂在窝沟封闭剂保留率及预防龋齿方面的有效性。
Pediatr Dent. 2008 Jan-Feb;30(1):25-8.