Lee Jong-Koo, Chung Ji Eun, Pyon Jai Kyong, Lee Kyeong-Tae
Department of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Apr;49(7):1963-1972. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04556-3. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
The widely used triple-antibiotics irrigation solution, comprising cefazolin, gentamycin, and povidone-iodine solution, has been employed for preventing infection and capsular contracture in implant-based breast reconstruction. However, potential overlapping in the coverage of such antimicrobial effects and the recent emergence of cefazolin-resistant gram-positive bacteria has prompted concerns regarding the efficacy of routine use of cefazolin in irrigation solutions. This study aims to evaluate clinical safety of omitting cefazolin from the traditional triple-antibiotic irrigation solution.
Patients who underwent immediate prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction between September 2020 and April 2022 were reviewed. They were divided into two groups: cases using the traditional triple-antibiotics for the former third and those using dual-antibiotics (omitting cefazolin) for the latter. Development of postoperative complications were compared by the type of irrigation solution and its independent associations with the adverse outcomes were evaluated.
In total, 445 cases (126 using triple- and 319 using dual-regimen solution) were analyzed with a mean follow-up period of 12 months. The two groups had generally similar baseline characteristics. Overall complications developed in 126 cases (28.3%), including 12 (2.7%) of infection and 32 (7.2%) of capsular contracture. The complication profiles did not differ between the groups. Multivariable analyses exhibited that the type of irrigation solution was not associated with the development of overall and any kind of complication including infection and capsular contracture.
Omission of cefazolin from the irrigation solution may not elevate the risks of infection and capsular contracture in prepectoral direct-to-implant reconstruction. Further long-term studies would be warranted.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
广泛使用的三联抗生素冲洗液,由头孢唑林、庆大霉素和聚维酮碘溶液组成,已被用于预防植入式乳房重建中的感染和包膜挛缩。然而,这种抗菌作用覆盖范围的潜在重叠以及最近出现的耐头孢唑林革兰氏阳性菌引发了人们对冲洗液中常规使用头孢唑林疗效的担忧。本研究旨在评估从传统三联抗生素冲洗液中省略头孢唑林的临床安全性。
回顾了2020年9月至2022年4月期间接受即刻胸前区直接植入式乳房重建的患者。他们被分为两组:前三分之一使用传统三联抗生素的病例和后三分之二使用双联抗生素(省略头孢唑林)的病例。通过冲洗液类型比较术后并发症的发生情况,并评估其与不良结局的独立关联。
总共分析了445例病例(126例使用三联方案,319例使用双联方案),平均随访期为12个月。两组的基线特征总体相似。126例(28.3%)出现了总体并发症,包括12例(2.7%)感染和32例(7.2%)包膜挛缩。两组的并发症情况没有差异。多变量分析表明,冲洗液类型与总体并发症以及包括感染和包膜挛缩在内的任何类型并发症的发生均无关联。
冲洗液中省略头孢唑林可能不会增加胸前区直接植入式重建中感染和包膜挛缩的风险。有必要进行进一步的长期研究。
证据级别III:本杂志要求作者为每篇文章指定证据级别。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或作者在线指南www.springer.com/00266 。