Kulenova Alua, Rice Kathleen, Adams Alayne, Lencucha Raphael
Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, 5858 Ch. de la Côte-des-Neiges, Montreal, QC, H3S 1Z1, Canada.
School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, 3630 Promenade Sir William Osler, Montreal, QC, H3G 1Y5, Canada.
Global Health. 2024 Dec 3;20(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12992-024-01086-0.
Eliminating gender inequality and promoting population health are stand-alone goals in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It is crucial to understand goal setting and policy making processes aimed at promoting gender and health equality given the entrenched and structural natures of these inequalities. Our research examines the process of problem and solution representation, priority setting, and factors that shape the policymaking process concerning women and girls within the UN system in relation to the SDGs. Data for this study were collected from semi-structured one-on-one interviews with participants who have work experience within the United Nations (UN) (n = 9). The analysis was informed by a qualitative descriptive methodology. Our findings identify the role of political forces in influencing policy, the challenges of limited and tied financial resources, the role of scientific evidence and data, and the purpose of different mandates across agencies. Political forces were found to shape the work of UN agencies, often hindering advancement of the SDG agenda. At the same time participants noted how they navigated opposition or what they considered regressive approaches to women and girls' health in order to pursue a more progressive agenda. Finite financial resources were also noted to play an important role in shaping SDG implementation pertaining to women and girls' health. Identification of the types of knowledge, evidence, and data that drive and are given preference in policy creation and development can highlight shortcomings and strengths of current modes of policy development and implementation. Key stakeholders and future research in health and development policy spheres can draw from our findings to gain insight into problem representation and prioritization. This will help identify underlying assumptions that inform work on women's and girls' health and how they shape policy agendas.
消除性别不平等和促进人口健康是可持续发展目标(SDGs)中的独立目标。鉴于这些不平等现象的根深蒂固和结构性本质,了解旨在促进性别与健康平等的目标设定和政策制定过程至关重要。我们的研究考察了问题与解决方案呈现、优先事项设定的过程,以及在联合国系统内与可持续发展目标相关的、影响妇女和女童政策制定过程的因素。本研究的数据来自对有联合国工作经验的参与者(n = 9)进行的半结构化一对一访谈。分析采用定性描述方法。我们的研究结果确定了政治力量在影响政策方面的作用、有限且有条件的财政资源带来的挑战、科学证据和数据的作用,以及各机构不同任务的目的。研究发现政治力量塑造了联合国各机构的工作,常常阻碍可持续发展目标议程的推进。与此同时,参与者指出他们如何应对反对意见,或者他们认为针对妇女和女童健康的倒退做法,以便推行更进步的议程。有限的财政资源在影响与妇女和女童健康相关的可持续发展目标实施方面也被指出发挥着重要作用。确定在政策制定和发展中驱动并受到优先考虑的知识、证据和数据类型,可以凸显当前政策制定和实施模式的优缺点。卫生与发展政策领域的关键利益相关者和未来研究可以借鉴我们研究结果,深入了解问题呈现和优先事项确定。这将有助于确定影响妇女和女童健康工作的潜在假设,以及它们如何塑造政策议程。