Suppr超能文献

知识从何而来?全球生物伦理学中的认识论正义。

Where is knowledge from the global South? An account of epistemic justice for a global bioethics.

机构信息

Queensland Bioethics Centre, Australian Catholic University - Brisbane Campus, Banyo, Queensland, Australia

Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2023 May;49(5):325-334. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108291. Epub 2023 Jan 19.

Abstract

The silencing of the epistemologies, theories, principles, values, concepts and experiences of the global South constitutes a particularly egregious epistemic injustice in bioethics. Our shared responsibility to rectify that injustice should be at the top of the ethics agenda. That it is not, or only is in part, is deeply problematic and endangers the credibility of the entire field. As a first step towards reorienting the field, this paper offers a comprehensive account of epistemic justice for global health ethics. We first introduce several different conceptions of justice and decolonisation in relation to knowledge, purposefully drawing on work emanating from the global South as well as the global North. We then apply those conceptions to the global health ethics context to generate a tripartite account of the layers of epistemic justice in the field: who is producing ethics knowledge; what theories and concepts are being applied to produce ethics knowledge; and whose voices are sought, recorded and used to generate ethics knowledge. These layers reflect that the field spans conceptual and empirical research. We conclude by proposing that, going forward, three avenues are key to achieve greater epistemic justice at each layer and to help decolonise global health ethics: namely, understanding the problem, dialogue and structural change.

摘要

对全球南方的认识论、理论、原则、价值观、概念和经验的压制,构成了生物伦理学中一种特别恶劣的认识不公正。我们纠正这种不公正的共同责任应该是道德议程的首要任务。但事实并非如此,或者只是部分如此,这存在很大问题,并危及整个领域的可信度。作为重新调整该领域的第一步,本文为全球健康伦理中的认识公正提供了一个全面的论述。我们首先介绍了几种不同的与知识相关的正义和非殖民化概念,有意借鉴了来自南方和北方的工作。然后,我们将这些概念应用于全球健康伦理背景下,以生成该领域认识公正的三个层面的描述:谁在生产伦理知识;应用于产生伦理知识的理论和概念是什么;以及谁的声音被寻求、记录和用于产生伦理知识。这些层面反映了该领域跨越了概念和经验研究。最后,我们提出,为了在每个层面实现更大的认识公正,并帮助全球健康伦理非殖民化,未来有三个途径是关键:即理解问题、对话和结构变革。

相似文献

4
Epistemic solidarity in medicine and healthcare.医学和医疗保健中的认知团结。
Med Health Care Philos. 2022 Dec;25(4):681-692. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10112-0. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
9
Epistemic justice and feminist bioethics in global health.全球卫生中的认知正义与女性主义生物伦理学。
J Med Ethics. 2023 May;49(5):345-346. doi: 10.1136/jme-2023-109100. Epub 2023 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

2
Tracing epistemic injustice in global antimicrobial resistance research.探寻全球抗菌药物耐药性研究中的认知不公。
Trends Microbiol. 2025 Jun;33(6):577-579. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2025.02.005. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
3
Can we unplug global health education from The Matrix?我们能否将全球健康教育从“母体”中抽离出来?
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Feb 25;5(2):e0004307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004307. eCollection 2025.
4
Missed Nuances in Tuberculosis Research: Reflections from a Tibetan Scholar.结核病研究中被忽视的细微差别:一位藏族学者的思考
Int J Soc Determinants Health Health Serv. 2025 Jul;55(3):330-337. doi: 10.1177/27551938251314654. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
5
Solidarity and its decoloniality in global health ethics.全球卫生伦理中的团结及其去殖民化
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jan 16;24(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02380-y.

本文引用的文献

1
The challenges of defining global health research.界定全球卫生研究的挑战。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Dec;6(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008169.
2
3
Epistemic injustice in academic global health.学术全球健康中的认知不公正。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Oct;9(10):e1465-e1470. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00301-6. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
6
Will global health survive its decolonisation?全球卫生能否在去殖民化过程中存续下来?
Lancet. 2020 Nov 21;396(10263):1627-1628. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32417-X.
9
10
African Perspectives in Global Bioethics.全球生物伦理学中的非洲视角
Dev World Bioeth. 2018 Sep;18(3):208-211. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12189.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验