Wong Ethan, Williams Ofir, Williams Ziv M, Báez-Mendoza Raymundo
Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States.
Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 18;15:1412131. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1412131. eCollection 2024.
The social characteristics of others can powerfully influence our decisions. They can also be broadly impacted by the social context in which these choices are made, making the effects of these characteristics on decision-making especially challenging to understand.
Here, we developed a Generative Narrative Survey that provided participants with naturalistic scenarios that richly varied in social context and theme but that also systematically varied the characteristics of the social agents involved, followed by a question. An example of this narrative is
After validating this approach using feeling thermometer measures, we found that the emotional states of others had the strongest and most consistent effect on the participants' choices. More notably, whereas most characteristics had independent effects on decision-making, social features such as the inferred socioeconomic status of others significantly influenced the effect that race had on the participant's judgments. Moreover, the social context of the agent's interactions with other agents had a significant additive effect, especially when the emotional states of the agents in the scenarios contrasted. The influence of these characteristics on the participants' choices was also markedly affected by their demographics, especially when contrasting with that of the agents involved, and were often driven by the participants' reported political views.
Together, these findings reveal how the mixture of social characteristics, context, and personal views influence decision-making and highlight the use of naturalistic generative narrative surveys in studying human behavior.
他人的社会特征能够有力地影响我们的决策。这些特征还会受到做出这些选择时所处社会环境的广泛影响,使得这些特征对决策的影响尤其难以理解。
在此,我们开发了一种生成性叙事调查,为参与者提供自然主义场景,这些场景在社会背景和主题方面丰富多样,但也系统地改变了所涉及社会主体的特征,随后提出一个问题。这种叙事的一个例子是
在用感觉温度计测量法验证了这种方法后,我们发现他人的情绪状态对参与者的选择具有最强且最一致的影响。更值得注意的是,虽然大多数特征对决策有独立影响,但诸如他人推断的社会经济地位等社会特征显著影响了种族对参与者判断的影响。此外,主体与其他主体互动的社会背景具有显著的累加效应,尤其是当场景中主体的情绪状态形成对比时。这些特征对参与者选择的影响也明显受到他们的人口统计学特征影响,特别是与所涉及主体的特征形成对比时,并且往往受到参与者所报告的政治观点驱动。
总之,这些发现揭示了社会特征、背景和个人观点的混合如何影响决策,并突出了自然主义生成性叙事调查在研究人类行为中的应用。