Suppr超能文献

鞍形旋转膝关节假体优于低接触应力膝关节:一项短期回顾性比较研究。

Saddle-shaped rotating knee prosthesis outperforms low contact stress knee: A short-term retrospective comparative study.

作者信息

Itoh Masafumi, Itou Junya, Kuwashima Umito, Okazaki Ken

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery Tokyo Women's Medical University Shinjuku Tokyo Japan.

出版信息

J Exp Orthop. 2024 Dec 2;11(4):e70072. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70072. eCollection 2024 Oct.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This retrospective comparative study aimed to compare the native patellar alignment and clinical outcomes of the Rotating Concave-Convex (ROCC) knee, which features a saddle-shaped rotating platform (RP) insert and a deep trochlea, versus the low contact stress (LCS) knee, which has favourable long-term outcomes and features an anatomically shaped trochlea and a cruciate-sacrificing RP insert. We hypothesized that the deeper trochlea of the ROCC would further stabilize the native patella, resulting in superior clinical outcomes compared to LCS-RP.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent patellar-nonresurfacing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using ROCC or LCS-RP were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with over 1-year post-TKA follow-up were included. Patients with neurologic disorders affecting knee function or additional ipsilateral knee surgery before evaluation were excluded. Patellar alignment was evaluated using the patella tilting angle (PTA), patella shift (PS), and the ratio of patella fitting depth into the trochlea () on axial radiographs. Primary and secondary outcomes were evaluated using the patellar score assessing patellofemoral function and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Multiple regression analyses were performed with primary and secondary outcomes as dependent variables.

RESULTS

The analysis included 113 ROCC knees and 94 LCS-RP knees (median follow-up: 25 months, follow-up rate: 92.3%). For ROCC and LCS-RP, respectively, the mean PTA was 0.3 (3.2)° and 4.3 (2.9)°; PS was 0.5 (1.8) and 2.0 (2.5) mm; and was 29.6 (8.1)% and 21.4 (6.5)% (all  < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, ROCC positively affected both primary and secondary outcomes ( = 0.004 and 0.0003-0.02, respectively).

CONCLUSION

At short-term follow-up, ROCC stabilized the patella further horizontally, centrally, and deeply into the trochlea, thus outperforming LCS-RP clinically. Orthopaedic surgeons should consider these potential advantages when selecting TKA models, especially those featuring cruciate-sacrificing RP mechanisms in patellar-nonresurfacing procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III. Retrospective comparative study.

摘要

目的

本回顾性比较研究旨在比较旋转凹凸(ROCC)膝关节与低接触应力(LCS)膝关节的髌骨自然对线情况和临床结果。ROCC膝关节具有鞍形旋转平台(RP)衬垫和深滑车,而LCS膝关节长期效果良好,具有解剖形状的滑车和牺牲交叉韧带的RP衬垫。我们假设ROCC更深的滑车会进一步稳定自然髌骨,从而产生比LCS-RP更好的临床结果。

方法

对连续接受使用ROCC或LCS-RP进行髌骨非表面置换初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)的患者进行回顾性研究。纳入TKA术后随访超过1年的患者。排除在评估前患有影响膝关节功能的神经系统疾病或同侧膝关节再次手术的患者。在轴向X线片上使用髌骨倾斜角(PTA)、髌骨移位(PS)和髌骨与滑车适配深度的比值()评估髌骨对线情况。使用评估髌股关节功能的髌骨评分和膝关节损伤与骨关节炎转归评分评估主要和次要结果。以主要和次要结果作为因变量进行多元回归分析。

结果

分析包括113例ROCC膝关节和94例LCS-RP膝关节(中位随访时间:25个月,随访率:92.3%)。对于ROCC和LCS-RP,平均PTA分别为0.3(3.2)°和4.3(2.9)°;PS分别为0.5(1.8)和2.0(2.5)mm;分别为29.6(8.1)%和21.4(6.5)%(均P<0.001)。多因素分析显示,ROCC对主要和次要结果均有积极影响(分别为P = 0.004和0.0003 - 0.02)。

结论

在短期随访中,ROCC在水平、中心和滑车深度方面进一步稳定了髌骨,因此在临床上优于LCS-RP。骨科医生在选择TKA模型时应考虑这些潜在优势,尤其是在髌骨非表面置换手术中采用牺牲交叉韧带RP机制的模型。

证据水平

III级。回顾性比较研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79da/11610624/7aa6a57a6bd3/JEO2-11-e70072-g004.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验