Suppr超能文献

老年髋关节置换手术患者中丙泊酚与环泊酚术后苏醒情况的比较:一项单盲、随机、对照试验

Comparison of postoperative awakening between ciprofol and propofol in elderly patients undergoing hip replacement surgery: a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

作者信息

Yang Dawei, Zhou Jie, Sun Luyu, Li Min, Zhang Jianyou

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, University of Yangzhou, Yangzhou, China.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, University of Yangzhou, Yangzhou, China.

出版信息

Minerva Anestesiol. 2024 Dec;90(12):1074-1081. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18263-6. Epub 2024 Dec 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this paper was to compare the impact of continuous infusion of ciprofol versus propofol on postoperative awakening in elderly patients following hip replacement surgery.

METHODS

Patients were randomized into two groups (N.=45 each): the ciprofol group and the propofol group. The ciprofol group received ciprofol for anesthesia induction and maintenance, while the propofol group underwent anesthesia induction and maintenance using propofol. The primary outcome was awakening time. Secondary outcomes included spontaneous breathing recovery time, extubation time, time to modified Aldrete Score ≥9, modified observer's assessment of alertness/sedation (MOAA/S) scores, anesthetic dosage, volume of fluid replacement, urine output and administration of vasoactive drugs.

RESULTS

The Ciprofol group exhibited a significantly prolonged awakening time (11.0±6.4 min vs. 7.4±4.3 min, P=0.003), spontaneous breathing recovery time (9.9±6.3 min vs. 5.9±4.3 min, P=0.001), and extubation time (12.0 [8.0-16.0] min vs. 8.5 [6.0-11.0] min, P=0.005), and reduced requirement for intraoperative fluid replacement (728.9±254.2 mL vs. 908.3±287.5 mL, P=0.003), increased urine output (235.1±102.1 mL vs. 173.5±106.2 mL, P=0.007), decreased likelihood of vasoactive drug administration (15/30 vs. 28/14, P=0.002). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of reaching a modified Aldrete Score ≥9, MOAA/S scores at 0, 5, 15, or 30 minutes post-extubation, or occurrence of adverse reactions (P>0.05). The dosage of remifentanil was significantly higher in the ciprofol group [5.4 (2.7-7.4) μg·kg·h vs. 3.4 (1.9-4.3) μg·kg·h, P=0.004], with a mean maintenance dose of ciprofol at 0.8 mg·kg·h (range: 0.5 to 1.2 mg·kg·h).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to propofol, the administration of ciprofol in elderly patients following hip replacement surgery is associated with prolonged awakening time, spontaneous breathing recovery time, and extubation. The average intravenous maintenance dosage of ciprofol in geriatric patients under general anesthesia was 0.8 mg·kg·h.

摘要

背景

本文旨在比较持续输注环泊酚与丙泊酚对老年髋关节置换术后患者苏醒的影响。

方法

将患者随机分为两组(每组n = 45):环泊酚组和丙泊酚组。环泊酚组采用环泊酚进行麻醉诱导和维持,而丙泊酚组采用丙泊酚进行麻醉诱导和维持。主要结局为苏醒时间。次要结局包括自主呼吸恢复时间、拔管时间、改良Aldrete评分≥9的时间、改良警觉/镇静观察评分(MOAA/S)、麻醉剂量、补液量、尿量及血管活性药物的使用情况。

结果

环泊酚组的苏醒时间(11.0±6.4分钟 vs. 7.4±4.3分钟,P = 0.003)、自主呼吸恢复时间(9.9±6.3分钟 vs. 5.9±4.3分钟,P = 0.001)和拔管时间(12.0 [8.0 - 16.0]分钟 vs. 8.5 [6.0 - 11.0]分钟,P = 0.005)显著延长,术中补液需求减少(728.9±254.2毫升 vs. 908.3±287.5毫升,P = 0.003),尿量增加(235.1±102.1毫升 vs. 173.5±106.2毫升,P = 0.007),血管活性药物使用的可能性降低(15/30 vs. 28/14,P = 0.002)。两组在改良Aldrete评分≥9、拔管后0、5、15或30分钟的MOAA/S评分或不良反应发生率方面无显著差异(P>0.05)。环泊酚组瑞芬太尼剂量显著更高[5.4(2.7 - 7.4)μg·kg·h vs. 3.4(1.9 - 4.3)μg·kg·h,P = 0.004],环泊酚平均维持剂量为0.8 mg·kg·h(范围:0.5至1.2 mg·kg·h)。

结论

与丙泊酚相比,老年髋关节置换术后患者使用环泊酚会导致苏醒时间、自主呼吸恢复时间和拔管时间延长。老年患者全身麻醉下环泊酚的平均静脉维持剂量为0.8 mg·kg·h。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验