Lane Sierra, Nahmias Jeffry, Lekawa Michael, Christian Fox John, Chandwani Carrie, Lotfipour Shahram, Grigorian Areg
University of California, Irvine, Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Orange, California.
University of California, Irvine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Orange, California.
West J Emerg Med. 2024 Nov;25(6):938-945. doi: 10.5811/westjem.20523.
The efficient utilization of resources is a crucial aspect of healthcare, particularly in both Level I and Level II American College of Surgeons (ACS)-verified trauma centers. The effect of resource allocation on emergency department length of stay (ED-LOS) of trauma patients has remained under-investigated. As ED crowding has become more prevalent, especially at quaternary care centers, an evaluation of the potential disparities in ED-LOS between Level I and Level II trauma centers is warranted. We hypothesized a longer ED-LOS at Level I centers compared to Level II centers.
We queried the 2017-2021 Trauma Quality Improvement Process (TQIP) database for trauma patients ≥18 years of age presenting to either a Level-I or -II center. The TQIP defines ED-LOS as the time from arrival until the time an ED disposition (admission or discharge) order is written. We excluded transferred patients and those with missing data regarding ACS trauma center verification level. We performed bivariate analyses, as well as subgroup analyses based on location of disposition.
Of 2,225,067 trauma patients, 59.3% (1,318,497) received treatment at Level I centers. No significant differences were found in Injury Severity Scores between patients admitted to the operating room or non-intensive care unit (ICU) locations, or discharged home from Level-I and -II centers (all < 0.05). The ED-LOS for trauma patients was longer at Level-I centers for all patient categories: overall (198 vs 145 minutes [min], < 0.001), discharged home (286 vs 160 min, < 0.001), non-ICU admissions (234 vs 164 min, < 0.001), and those requiring surgery (126 vs 101 min, < 0.001).
Even when treating patients with similar injury severity, trauma patients at Level I trauma centers had longer ED-LOS compared to Level II centers, irrespective of the patients' final disposition (surgery, non-ICU admission, or discharge). To optimize resource utilization and alleviate ED saturation, further research must delve into the underlying causes of these discrepancies to identify best practices and solutions.
资源的有效利用是医疗保健的一个关键方面,在美国外科医师学会(ACS)认证的一级和二级创伤中心尤其如此。资源分配对创伤患者急诊室住院时间(ED-LOS)的影响仍未得到充分研究。随着急诊室拥挤现象变得更加普遍,尤其是在四级医疗中心,有必要评估一级和二级创伤中心之间急诊室住院时间的潜在差异。我们假设一级中心的急诊室住院时间比二级中心更长。
我们查询了2017 - 2021年创伤质量改进流程(TQIP)数据库,以获取年龄≥18岁且前往一级或二级中心就诊的创伤患者信息。TQIP将急诊室住院时间定义为从到达至开具急诊处置(入院或出院)医嘱的时间。我们排除了转院患者以及那些缺少ACS创伤中心认证级别数据的患者。我们进行了双变量分析以及基于处置地点的亚组分析。
在2225067例创伤患者中,59.3%(1318497例)在一级中心接受治疗。入住手术室或非重症监护病房(ICU)的患者,以及从一级和二级中心出院回家的患者,其损伤严重程度评分无显著差异(均P < 0.05)。所有患者类别中,一级中心创伤患者的急诊室住院时间更长:总体(198分钟对145分钟,P < 0.001)、出院回家(286分钟对160分钟,P < 0.001)、非ICU入院(234分钟对164分钟,P < 0.001)以及需要手术的患者(126分钟对101分钟,P < 0.001)。
即使在治疗损伤严重程度相似的患者时,一级创伤中心的创伤患者急诊室住院时间也比二级中心更长,无论患者的最终处置方式(手术、非ICU入院或出院)如何。为了优化资源利用并缓解急诊室饱和状态,进一步的研究必须深入探究这些差异的根本原因,以确定最佳实践和解决方案。