Yoo Jeongin, Lee Jeong Min, Joo Ijin, Yoon Jeong Hee
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, South Korea.
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 3;19(12):e0314263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314263. eCollection 2024.
To assess the efficacy of contrast vector imaging (CVI) in detecting tumoral vascular structures and flow characteristics of focal liver lesions (FLLs) for differential diagnosis.
In this prospective study, 65 participants with FLLs underwent CEUS using SonoVue with high-frame-rate imaging technique between July 2019 and October 2020. CVI was obtained by post-processing arterial cine imaging of CEUS. Tumoral vascular structures, velocity histogram, and mean velocities were compared among hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), non-HCC malignancies, and benign tumors using the Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests, respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of CEUS in determining HCC probability was compared to that of CEUS with CVI using a z-test.
CVI was technically successful in 52 of 65 (80%) participants (19 HCCs, 13 non-HCC malignancies, and 20 benign tumors). The detectability of tumoral vascular structures was significantly higher in CEUS with CVI, compared to CEUS alone (46.2% [24/52] vs. 100.0% [52/52], p<0.001). On CEUS with CVI, complex intratumoral and peripheral vessels were frequent in HCCs (100% of HCCs, 46.2% of non-HCC malignancies, and 70.0% of benign tumors), while detour vessels were frequent in non-HCC malignancies (none of HCCs, 53.8% of non-HCC malignancies, and 10.0% of benign tumors) (p<0.001). The mean velocity of HCC (26.3 mm/s) was the highest, while that of non-HCC malignancy (20.6 mm/s) was the lowest (p<0.001). CEUS with CVI showed higher AUC, compared to CEUS in both reviewers (0.851 vs. 0.963, p = 0.005 for reviewer 1; 0.853 vs. 0.982, p = 0.023 for reviewer 2).
CEUS with CVI better visualized vascular structures and flow characteristics of FLLs, and showed better diagnostic performance in determining HCC probability than CEUS.
评估对比向量成像(CVI)在检测肝脏局灶性病变(FLLs)的肿瘤血管结构和血流特征以进行鉴别诊断方面的有效性。
在这项前瞻性研究中,2019年7月至2020年10月期间,65例FLLs患者使用声诺维及高帧率成像技术接受了超声造影(CEUS)检查。通过对CEUS的动脉期电影成像进行后处理获得CVI。分别使用卡方检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验比较肝细胞癌(HCC)、非HCC恶性肿瘤和良性肿瘤之间的肿瘤血管结构、速度直方图和平均速度。使用z检验比较CEUS在确定HCC概率时的受试者操作特征曲线(AUC)与CEUS联合CVI的AUC。
65例参与者中有52例(80%)在技术上成功获得CVI(19例HCC、13例非HCC恶性肿瘤和20例良性肿瘤)。与单纯CEUS相比,CEUS联合CVI时肿瘤血管结构的可检测性显著更高(46.2%[24/52]对100.0%[52/52],p<0.001)。在CEUS联合CVI时,HCC中肿瘤内和周边的复杂血管较为常见(100%的HCC、46.2%的非HCC恶性肿瘤和70.0%的良性肿瘤),而非HCC恶性肿瘤中迂曲血管较为常见(HCC中无、53.8%的非HCC恶性肿瘤和10.0%的良性肿瘤)(p<0.001)。HCC的平均速度最高(26.3mm/s),而非HCC恶性肿瘤的平均速度最低(20.6mm/s)(p<0.001)。两位观察者中,CEUS联合CVI的AUC均高于单纯CEUS(观察者1:0.851对0.963,p = 0.005;观察者2:0.853对0.982,p = 0.023)。
CEUS联合CVI能更好地显示FLLs的血管结构和血流特征,在确定HCC概率方面比CEUS具有更好的诊断性能。