Suppr超能文献

坐站两用办公桌对上班族全天及工作中久坐行为的影响:一项系统综述

The Impact of Sit-Stand Desks on Full-Day and Work-Based Sedentary Behavior of Office Workers: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Silva Hélio, Ramos Pedro G F, Teno Sabrina C, Júdice Pedro B

机构信息

CIDEFES - Universidade Lusófona, Lisboa, Portugal.

CIDEFES - Universidade Lusófona, Lisboa & CIFI2D - Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2025 Jul;67(7):695-713. doi: 10.1177/00187208241305591. Epub 2024 Dec 3.

Abstract

ObjectiveTo gather the existing evidence on the impact of sit-stand desk-based interventions on working-time and full-day sedentary behavior and compare their impact across different intervention lengths.BackgroundReducing sedentary behavior is vital for improving office workers' health. Sit-stand desks promote sitting and standing alternation, but understanding their effects outside the workplace is essential for success.MethodsStudies published between January 2008 and January 2024 were searched through electronic databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library). The quality of the studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies of the Effective Public Health Practice Project.ResultsTwelve included studies showed that the intervention group experienced average reductions in full-day sedentary behavior of 68.7 min/day at 3 months, 77.7 min/day at 6 months, and 62.1 min/day at 12 months compared to the control group. For working hours sedentary behavior, reductions were observed in the intervention group at 9 weeks (73.0 min/day), 3 months (88.0 min/day), 6 months (80.8 min/day), and 12 months (48.0 min/day) relative to the control group.ConclusionsSit-stand desk interventions can be effective in helping office workers reduce sedentary behavior in the short, medium, and long-term both at work and throughout the full-day.ApplicationActive workstation interventions, including sit-stand desks, educational sessions, and alert software, aim to reduce sedentary behavior among office workers. While sit-stand desks show promise in decreasing sitting time during working hours, their long-term effectiveness and impact beyond the workplace remain uncertain. This review evaluates their effectiveness across different durations, addressing both workplace and full-day impact.

摘要

目的

收集现有证据,以了解基于坐站两用办公桌的干预措施对工作时间和全天久坐行为的影响,并比较不同干预时长下的影响。

背景

减少久坐行为对于改善办公室职员的健康至关重要。坐站两用办公桌可促进坐姿和站姿的交替,但了解其在工作场所之外的效果对于成功实施干预至关重要。

方法

通过电子数据库(PubMed、谷歌学术和考科蓝图书馆)检索2008年1月至2024年1月发表的研究。使用有效公共卫生实践项目定量研究质量评估工具对研究质量进行评估。

结果

12项纳入研究表明,与对照组相比,干预组在3个月时全天久坐行为平均减少68.7分钟/天,6个月时减少77.7分钟/天,12个月时减少62.1分钟/天。对于工作时间的久坐行为,与对照组相比,干预组在9周(73.0分钟/天)、3个月(88.0分钟/天)、6个月(80.8分钟/天)和12个月(48.0分钟/天)时均有减少。

结论

坐站两用办公桌干预措施在帮助办公室职员短期、中期和长期减少工作时及全天的久坐行为方面可能有效。

应用

包括坐站两用办公桌、教育课程和提醒软件在内的主动式工作站干预措施旨在减少办公室职员的久坐行为。虽然坐站两用办公桌在减少工作时间的坐姿时长方面显示出前景,但其长期有效性及在工作场所之外的影响仍不确定。本综述评估了其在不同时长下的有效性,涉及工作场所和全天的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验