Suppr超能文献

全球纵向应变与糖尿病且接受血液透析患者的死亡率相关性较差。

Global Longitudinal Strain Correlates Poorly with Mortality in People with Diabetes Mellitus and Receiving Haemodialysis.

作者信息

Al-Chalabi Saif, Alezergawi Sally, Green Darren, Sinha Smeeta, Kalra Philip A

机构信息

Donal O'Donoghue Renal Research Centre, Salford Care Organisation, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.

Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Cardiorenal Med. 2025;15(1):61-71. doi: 10.1159/000542964. Epub 2024 Dec 3.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Haemodialysis (HD) is a life-sustaining treatment for individuals with end-stage kidney disease. However, the risk of mortality remains significantly higher compared to the general population, even when matched for age and sex. Global longitudinal strain (GLS), derived from speckle tracking echocardiography, has shown promise as a predictor of mortality in HD patients. However, its prognostic utility in patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes mellitus (DM) and receiving HD remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of GLS in HD patients, with and without DM.

METHODS

This prospective study was a long-term follow-up extension study of an earlier published study that investigated a cohort of HD patients from a single centre with a comprehensive cardiovascular imaging protocol. All patients had an echocardiography with the use of speckle tracking software to determine GLS. Patients were divided into group A (with DM) and group B (without DM). Patients were followed up until death, major adverse cardiovascular events, transplantation, or the censoring date (29 February 2024). Statistical analyses were performed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

A total of 184 patients receiving HD were included in the analysis. Patients with DM (group A) had significantly higher all-cause mortality (ACM) (47.1% vs. 20.7%, p < 0.001) and a lower chance of receiving a kidney transplant (13.2% vs. 43.1%, p < 0.001). In group A, GLS did not predict ACM, whereas in group B, a GLS cut-off of -15.76% correlated with higher 5-year ACM (p = 0.036). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was a significant predictor of ACM in group A (HR 0.98; p = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

GLS is a poor predictor of adverse outcomes in HD patients with DM, likely due to their high cardiovascular risk. In contrast, GLS was a significant predictor of mortality in non-diabetic HD patients. LVEF may be a more reliable prognostic indicator in high-risk diabetic patients.

摘要

引言

血液透析(HD)是终末期肾病患者维持生命的治疗方法。然而,即便在年龄和性别匹配的情况下,与普通人群相比,血液透析患者的死亡风险仍然显著更高。基于斑点追踪超声心动图得出的整体纵向应变(GLS)已显示出有望成为血液透析患者死亡率的预测指标。然而,其在患有糖尿病(DM)等多种心血管危险因素且接受血液透析的患者中的预后效用仍不明确。本研究旨在评估GLS在有或无糖尿病的血液透析患者中的预后价值。

方法

本前瞻性研究是一项对先前发表研究的长期随访扩展研究,该研究对来自单一中心的一组血液透析患者采用了全面的心血管成像方案。所有患者均接受了使用斑点追踪软件的超声心动图检查以确定GLS。患者被分为A组(患有糖尿病)和B组(未患糖尿病)。对患者进行随访直至死亡、发生重大不良心血管事件、接受移植或截止日期(2024年2月29日)。使用单变量和多变量Cox比例风险模型进行统计分析。

结果

共有184例接受血液透析的患者纳入分析。患有糖尿病的患者(A组)全因死亡率(ACM)显著更高(47.1%对20.7%,p<0.001),接受肾脏移植的几率更低(13.2%对43.1%,p<0.001)。在A组中,GLS不能预测ACM,而在B组中,GLS临界值为-15.76%与更高的5年ACM相关(p=0.036)。左心室射血分数(LVEF)是A组中ACM的显著预测指标(HR 0.98;p=0.036)。

结论

GLS在患有糖尿病的血液透析患者中对不良结局的预测能力较差,可能是由于他们的心血管风险较高。相比之下,GLS在非糖尿病血液透析患者中是死亡率的显著预测指标。LVEF可能是高危糖尿病患者更可靠的预后指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ffe/11844706/7960c714a22e/crm-2025-0015-0001-542964_F01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验