Pan Yu, Dai Xuanyi, Tsoi James Kh, Lam Walter Yh, Pow Edmond Hn
Department of Dentistry, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, PR China.
Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong special administrative region, PR China.
J Dent. 2025 Jan;152:105498. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105498. Epub 2024 Dec 1.
Evaluating the effect of shape and size of implant scan body on the accuracy of optical 3D scanning.
Fifteen PEEK scan bodies were milled, including 1 spherical, 9 cylindrical, and 5 cuboidal. The 3D position and angulation of each scan body were measured using a CMM 3 times and a laboratory scanner 10 times. The linear and angular trueness and precision of the scans were calculated by comparing with the CMM measurements.
The linear accuracy of the cylindrical scan bodies (9.5 ± 6.2 µm) was significantly higher than those of the cuboidal (17.7 ± 8.1 µm) and spherical scan bodies (12.5 ± 6.5 µm). The cuboidal (0.050±0.009°) showed significantly better angular accuracy than the cylindrical (0.065±0.040°). In the cylindrical group, the narrow (∅4.8 mm) demonstrated significantly inferior accuracy than the wider (∅5.5 mm and ∅6.5 mm)(p = 0.003). The tall (12 mm) showed significantly higher angular trueness than the shorter (8 and 4 mm)(p < 0.001). In the cuboidal group, the 24 mm exhibited significantly poorer angular trueness compared to the 18 mm and 30 mm (p < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: The shape and size of the implant scan body significantly affect the scanning accuracy. Spherical scan bodies cannot transfer implant angulation. Scan bodies with a size of >∅4.8 mm and >8 mm seem accurate for transferring the 3D implant position.
The shape and size of scan bodies directly influence the accuracy of 3D scanning. Well-designed scan bodies offer better transfer results, which is crucial for ensuring passive fit of implant prostheses and improving long-term clinical outcomes.
评估种植体扫描体的形状和尺寸对光学三维扫描准确性的影响。
铣削加工15个聚醚醚酮(PEEK)扫描体,包括1个球形、9个圆柱形和5个长方体形。使用三坐标测量机(CMM)对每个扫描体的三维位置和角度进行3次测量,并使用实验室扫描仪进行10次测量。通过与CMM测量结果进行比较,计算扫描的线性和角度真实性及精度。
圆柱形扫描体的线性精度(9.5±6.2µm)显著高于长方体形(17.7±8.1µm)和球形扫描体(12.5±6.5µm)。长方体形(0.050±0.009°)的角度精度显著优于圆柱形(0.065±0.040°)。在圆柱形组中,窄径(∅4.8mm)的精度显著低于宽径(∅5.5mm和∅6.5mm)(p=0.003)。高(12mm)的角度真实性显著高于矮(8mm和4mm)(p<0.001)。在长方体形组中,24mm的角度真实性显著低于18mm和30mm(p<0.001)。结论:种植体扫描体的形状和尺寸显著影响扫描精度。球形扫描体无法传递种植体角度。尺寸>∅4.8mm和>8mm的扫描体在传递种植体三维位置方面似乎较为准确。
扫描体的形状和尺寸直接影响三维扫描的准确性。设计良好的扫描体可提供更好的传递结果,这对于确保种植体假体的被动适合以及改善长期临床效果至关重要。