Mohajerani Roksana, Djalalinia Shirin, Alikhasi Marzieh
School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1416634793, Iran.
Development of Research and Technology Center, Deputy of Research and Technology, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran 1467664961, Iran.
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jun 5;13(6):252. doi: 10.3390/dj13060252.
Accurate implant impressions are critical for capturing the three-dimensional (3D) spatial positioning of implants. Digital workflows using intraoral scanners (IOSs) and scan bodies offer distinct advantages over conventional elastomeric techniques. However, the geometry of scan bodies may influence the precision and trueness of IOS-acquired data, and optimal design parameters remain undefined. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effects of scan body geometry on the trueness of digital implant impressions captured using IOSs. : A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar up to 25 February 2025. Eligible studies assessed the impact of scan body geometry on the accuracy of implant-level impressions acquired with IOSs. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for In Vitro Studies of Dental Materials (QUIN). : Twenty-eight studies were included, of which twenty-six were in vitro. The included studies, published between 2020 and 2025, demonstrated that variations in macro- and micro-geometries influenced both linear and angular trueness. Cylindrical designs with optimal dimensions generally outperformed cuboidal or spherical forms. Structural modifications, such as rigid bar extensions and surface facets, often improved scan accuracy. Some hybrid or modified designs performed comparably to conventional scan bodies. According to QUIN, 27 studies were moderate quality and one had high quality. : Scan body geometry affected the accuracy of intraoral implant digital impressions. Designs featuring rigid extensions or simplified geometries improve trueness and precision. Further standardized clinical studies are needed to define optimal design features and validate current in vitro findings.
精确的种植体印模对于获取种植体的三维(3D)空间定位至关重要。使用口内扫描仪(IOS)和扫描体的数字工作流程比传统的弹性体技术具有明显优势。然而,扫描体的几何形状可能会影响IOS获取数据的精度和真实性,并且最佳设计参数仍未明确。本系统评价旨在评估扫描体几何形状对使用IOS获取的数字化种植体印模真实性的影响。:截至2025年2月25日,在PubMed、Scopus、EMBASE、Web of Science、Cochrane图书馆和谷歌学术上进行了系统检索。符合条件的研究评估了扫描体几何形状对使用IOS获取的种植体水平印模准确性的影响。使用牙科材料体外研究质量评估工具(QUIN)评估研究质量。:纳入了28项研究,其中26项为体外研究。纳入的研究发表于2020年至2025年之间,表明宏观和微观几何形状的变化会影响线性和角度真实性。具有最佳尺寸的圆柱形设计通常优于长方体或球形设计。结构修改,如刚性杆延伸和表面小平面,通常会提高扫描准确性。一些混合或改进设计的性能与传统扫描体相当。根据QUIN,27项研究质量中等,1项质量高。:扫描体几何形状影响口内种植体数字印模的准确性。具有刚性延伸或简化几何形状的设计可提高真实性和精度。需要进一步的标准化临床研究来确定最佳设计特征并验证当前的体外研究结果。