Suppr超能文献

非临床社交焦虑中检测面部表情变化的敏感性和反应偏差。

Sensitivity and response bias in non-clinical social anxiety to detect changes in facial expressions.

作者信息

Yuan Jing, Chen Xiang, Wang Zhaoxia, Zhao Xiaomin, Wang Yan, Liu Zejun

机构信息

School of Nursing, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei, China.

Hubei Water Resources Technical College, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2025 Mar;86:102003. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2024.102003. Epub 2024 Dec 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Previous research has not established a consensus on the ability of higher socially anxious individuals to detect facial expressions. The purpose of this study was to examine this issue using Signal Detection Theory (SDT) as a framework.

METHODS

Participants with higher levels of social anxiety (HSA) and lower levels of social anxiety (LSA) were instructed to complete a change-detection task. Prototypical (faces with congruent eyes and mouth, i.e., happy eyes and a smiling mouth) and blended (faces with incongruent eyes and mouth, i.e., neutral eyes and a happy mouth) facial expressions were used as stimuli. Participants had to decide whether the facial expression indicated by the cue was "the same" or "different".

RESULTS

The results revealed that the HSA group had a higher sensitivity (d') to detect changes in facial expressions compared to the LSA group. The LSA group had a higher d' to detect prototypical angry expressions than to blended angry expressions. However, this difference was not found in the HSA group. In addition, the HSA group displayed more leniency in judging angry expressions as being the same compared to the LSA group.

LIMITATIONS

The external validity of the study is limited by the sample (low levels of depression, mostly male).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher socially anxious individuals are more sensitive in detecting changes and are more lenient in judging changes in angry expressions.

摘要

背景与目的

先前的研究尚未就社交焦虑程度较高的个体识别面部表情的能力达成共识。本研究的目的是以信号检测理论(SDT)为框架来探讨这一问题。

方法

指导社交焦虑程度较高(HSA)和社交焦虑程度较低(LSA)的参与者完成一项变化检测任务。使用典型表情(眼睛和嘴巴一致的面部,即开心的眼睛和微笑的嘴巴)和混合表情(眼睛和嘴巴不一致的面部,即中性的眼睛和开心的嘴巴)作为刺激物。参与者必须判断线索所指示的面部表情是“相同”还是“不同”。

结果

结果显示,与LSA组相比,HSA组在检测面部表情变化方面具有更高的敏感度(d')。LSA组检测典型愤怒表情的d'高于检测混合愤怒表情的d'。然而,在HSA组中未发现这种差异。此外,与LSA组相比,HSA组在将愤怒表情判断为相同时表现出更大的宽容度。

局限性

本研究的外部效度受样本(低抑郁水平,大多为男性)限制。

结论

社交焦虑程度较高的个体在检测变化方面更敏感,在判断愤怒表情的变化时更宽容。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验