• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种针对精神科患者的新评定量表的效度研究。

A validity study of a new rating scale for psychiatric patients.

作者信息

Foreman E I, Baker R

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1986 Jan;73(1):101-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1986.tb02674.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1986.tb02674.x
PMID:3962698
Abstract

A criterion validation of a new scale, REHAB (Rehabilitation Evaluation Hall And Baker) (1) is described. Forty-three long-stay psychiatric patients from two wards were observed by a psychologist over a 2-week period using a time sampling procedure. The observed behaviour was coded into predetermined categories based on Blunden & Kushlick's (2) concept of engagement. Also during this period the ward nurses rated the 43 patients using the REHAB assessment. The time sampled observations were correlated with REHAB factors and items. Five hypotheses about the relationship between the two measures were tested. Four of the five hypotheses were supported by the data. Overall, despite certain limitations of the study, it is concluded that evidence is provided for the criterion validity of REHAB.

摘要

本文描述了一种新量表REHAB(康复评估厅与贝克量表)(1) 的标准效度验证。一位心理学家采用时间抽样程序,在两周时间内对来自两个病房的43名长期住院精神科患者进行了观察。根据布伦登和库什利克(2) 的参与概念,将观察到的行为编码为预先确定的类别。在此期间,病房护士也使用REHAB评估对这43名患者进行了评分。对时间抽样观察结果与REHAB因子及项目进行了相关性分析。对关于这两种测量方法之间关系的五个假设进行了检验。五个假设中的四个得到了数据支持。总体而言,尽管该研究存在一定局限性,但得出结论认为,有证据支持REHAB的标准效度。

相似文献

1
A validity study of a new rating scale for psychiatric patients.一种针对精神科患者的新评定量表的效度研究。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1986 Jan;73(1):101-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1986.tb02674.x.
2
Chronic patients in psychiatric institutions: psychopathology, level of functioning and need for care.精神病院里的慢性病患者:精神病理学、功能水平及护理需求。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1998 Jan;97(1):55-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1998.tb09963.x.
3
The Ward Daily Behaviour Scale.病房日常行为量表
Br J Psychiatry. 1994 Jul;165(1):87-93. doi: 10.1192/bjp.165.1.87.
4
The measurement of social behaviour in psychiatric patients: an assessment of the reliability and validity of the SBS schedule.精神病患者社会行为的测量:SBS量表信效度评估
Br J Psychiatry. 1986 Jan;148:1-11. doi: 10.1192/bjp.148.1.1.
5
Factor structure of the REHAB scale in an Irish sample.爱尔兰样本中REHAB量表的因子结构。
Int J Rehabil Res. 1995 Sep;18(3):270-3. doi: 10.1097/00004356-199509000-00009.
6
An acute psychiatric rating scale for the clinical assessment of functionally disturbed inpatients.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1995 Jun;91(6):402-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1995.tb09800.x.
7
The assessment and progress of long-stay and elderly psychiatric patients: the predictive validity of a ward behaviour questionnaire.长期住院老年精神科患者的评估与进展:病房行为问卷的预测效度
Br J Psychiatry. 1975 Aug;127:149-56. doi: 10.1192/bjp.127.2.149.
8
Psychiatric disorder and disability in New Zealand long-stay psychiatric patients.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1993 Dec;27(4):590-4. doi: 10.3109/00048679309075820.
9
The inter-rater reliability of Hall and Baker's REHAB scale: a cross-validation study.霍尔和贝克的康复量表的评分者间信度:一项交叉验证研究。
Br J Clin Psychol. 1988 Sep;27(3):277-8. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1988.tb00791.x.
10
Determining suitability of placement for long-stay psychiatric inpatients.
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1992 Jul;43(7):709-12. doi: 10.1176/ps.43.7.709.

引用本文的文献

1
Social Media and Social Functioning in Psychosis: A Systematic Review.精神病中的社交媒体与社交功能:一项系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 28;21(6):e13957. doi: 10.2196/13957.