Zapparoli Laura, Mariano Marika, Sacheli Lucia Maria, Berni Tommaso, Negrone Caterina, Toneatto Carlo, Paulesu Eraldo
Psychology Department and NeuroMi - Milan Centre for Neuroscience, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, Milan, Italy.
IRCCS Orthopedic Institute Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 3;14(1):30055. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80880-7.
In daily life interactions, we achieve goals with partners through tight temporal coordination or sequential joint efforts. Is our individual sense of control over shared outcomes (sense of self-agency) the same as the one experienced when we act alone? Do we explicitly and implicitly feel like we are fully in control of the motor act even if the goal is finally achieved by our partner? To address these questions, we measured explicit and implicit sense of self-agency in individual and (coordinated or sequential) interactive contexts. We studied 42 healthy adult participants during active/passive button presses aimed at turning on a light bulb. This goal could be achieved individually (Solo condition) or by interacting with a partner (Joint condition) synchronously (joint Coordination task) or sequentially (joint Sequential task). We collected trial-by-trial explicit judgments of self-agency. To quantify the intentional binding phenomenon, an index of implicit sense of agency, we also measured the perceived compression of the time interval between the active or passive movements and their outcomes. Explicit sense of agency: we observed decreased judgments of self-agency in Joint trials compared with the Solo ones in both the Coordination and Sequential tasks. Implicit sense of agency: in the Coordination task, we found a significant intentional binding effect only in Solo trials but not in Joint ones. For the Sequential task, however, a significant intentional binding was also present in the Joint condition. Our results indicate that the individual sense of agency is reduced during joint actions, yet this can be restored at an implicit level when the format of the motor interaction makes the individual contribution to goal achievement more obvious. We discuss these results considering current cognitive theories on motor awareness and interactions.
在日常生活互动中,我们通过紧密的时间协调或相继的共同努力与伙伴达成目标。我们对共同成果的个人控制感(自我能动性)与独自行动时的感受相同吗?即使最终目标是由伙伴实现的,我们是否会明确或隐含地感觉自己完全掌控着动作行为?为了解决这些问题,我们在个体以及(协调或相继的)互动情境中测量了自我能动性的明确和隐含感受。我们对42名健康成年参与者在主动/被动按下按钮以打开灯泡的过程中进行了研究。这个目标可以单独实现(单独条件),也可以与伙伴同步(联合协调任务)或相继(联合相继任务)互动来实现。我们逐次收集了关于自我能动性的明确判断。为了量化意向性绑定现象(一种隐含能动性指标),我们还测量了主动或被动动作与其结果之间时间间隔的感知压缩情况。明确的能动性感受:在协调任务和相继任务中,我们观察到与单独条件下的试验相比,联合试验中自我能动性的判断有所下降。隐含的能动性感受:在协调任务中,我们仅在单独试验中发现了显著的意向性绑定效应,而在联合试验中未发现。然而,对于相继任务,在联合条件下也存在显著的意向性绑定。我们的结果表明,在联合行动中个体的能动性感受会降低,但当动作互动形式使个体对目标达成的贡献更加明显时,这种感受可以在隐含层面得到恢复。我们结合当前关于动作意识和互动的认知理论对这些结果进行了讨论。