• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估“托盘注水”麻醉技术与霍尔斯特德技术相比疗效的随机对照试验。

Randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of the "water on tray" anesthesia technique compared to the Halsted technique.

作者信息

Hosseini Hadi, Amirpour Haradasht Sadra, Khazaei Amir Hossein, Parhizkar Sepehr, Dehabadi Farnaz

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry , Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Dec 3;28(12):680. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06082-7.

DOI:10.1007/s00784-024-06082-7
PMID:39627474
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

With respect to the high failure rate of conventional IANB technique and other associated disadvantages, in this study we focused on an alternative called Water on Tray technique and assessed the efficiency of this method compared to the conventional technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-blind, single center randomized controlled trial was carried out among 90 individuals referred to the dental clinic of the International Branch of Guilan University of Medical Sciences (IB-GUMS) from November to December of 2017. The patients were randomly assigned into two groups. Injection pain was assessed using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and patients were asked to report any tingling sensation on the lip and tongue on the side of injection. Electric pulp test (EPT) and the stick test were also performed. If no numbness was report within 15 min, the injection was deemed unsuccessful. SPSS software version 25 was used with the significance level of p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The WOT technique demonstrated a significantly higher success rate of achieving adequate anesthesia on the first attempt (p < 0.05). Additionally, the WOT technique exhibited other significant advantages, including no instances of positive aspiration, rapid onset of action coupled with lingual nerve block, and reduced pain during injection.

CONCLUSION

The Water on Tray is a favorable technique to achieve inferior alveolar nerve block due to its ease and high success rate compared to the conventional technique.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This technique allows dentists to achieve a higher success rate with inferior alveolar nerve blocks and reduce injection pain in patients.

摘要

目的

鉴于传统下牙槽神经阻滞(IANB)技术的高失败率及其他相关缺点,本研究聚焦于一种名为托盘注水技术的替代方法,并评估该方法与传统技术相比的有效性。

材料与方法

本单盲、单中心随机对照试验于2017年11月至12月在90名转诊至吉兰医科大学国际分校(IB - GUMS)牙科诊所的个体中进行。患者被随机分为两组。使用数字评定量表(NRS)评估注射疼痛,并要求患者报告注射侧嘴唇和舌头的任何刺痛感。还进行了牙髓电测试(EPT)和棉签试验。如果在15分钟内未报告麻木,则认为注射不成功。使用SPSS 25软件,显著性水平为p < 0.05。

结果

托盘注水技术在首次尝试时实现充分麻醉的成功率显著更高(p < 0.05)。此外,托盘注水技术还表现出其他显著优势,包括无回血阳性情况、起效迅速并伴有舌神经阻滞,以及注射时疼痛减轻。

结论

与传统技术相比,托盘注水技术操作简便且成功率高,是实现下牙槽神经阻滞的一种良好技术。

临床意义

该技术使牙医在下牙槽神经阻滞时能获得更高的成功率,并减轻患者的注射疼痛。

相似文献

1
Randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of the "water on tray" anesthesia technique compared to the Halsted technique.评估“托盘注水”麻醉技术与霍尔斯特德技术相比疗效的随机对照试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Dec 3;28(12):680. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06082-7.
2
Anesthetic efficacy of mental/incisive nerve block compared to inferior alveolar nerve block using 4% articaine in mandibular premolars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a randomized clinical trial.在有症状的不可复性牙髓炎的下颌前磨牙中,比较使用 4% 阿替卡因进行精神/切牙神经阻滞与下牙槽神经阻滞的麻醉效果:一项随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Feb;23(2):839-845. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2500-4. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
3
Extraction of mandibular premolars and molars: comparison between local infiltration via pressure syringe and inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia.下颌前磨牙和磨牙的拔除:经压力注射器局部浸润麻醉与下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉的比较。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Apr;22(3):1523-1530. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2251-7. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
4
Prospective clinical study comparing intraligamentary anesthesia and inferior alveolar nerve block for extraction of posterior mandibular teeth.一项比较后牙临床应用结扎内麻醉和下齿槽神经阻滞麻醉的前瞻性临床研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Apr;22(3):1469-1475. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2248-2. Epub 2017 Oct 15.
5
Does the combination of 3% mepivacaine plain plus 2% lidocaine with epinephrine improve anesthesia and reduce the pain of anesthetic injection for the inferior alveolar nerve block? A prospective, randomized, double-blind study.3% 单纯甲哌卡因联合 2% 利多卡因加肾上腺素能否改善下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉效果并减轻注射痛?一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。
J Endod. 2014 Sep;40(9):1287-92. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.04.015. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
6
Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of Gow-Gates mandibular conduction anesthesia, Vazirani-Akinosi technique, buccal-plus-lingual infiltrations, and conventional inferior alveolar nerve anesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis.不可逆性牙髓炎患者中Gow-Gates下颌传导麻醉、Vazirani-Akinosi技术、颊侧加舌侧浸润麻醉及传统下牙槽神经麻醉的麻醉效果比较评估
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Feb;109(2):303-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.09.016.
7
Anesthetic Effectiveness of Mental/Incisive Nerve Block versus Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Mandibular First and Second Premolars with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.精神/切牙神经阻滞与下牙槽神经阻滞在下颌第一和第二前磨牙症状性不可逆性牙髓炎中的麻醉效果:一项随机临床试验
J Endod. 2025 Apr;51(4):473-480. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2025.01.016. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
8
Efficacy of QuickSleeper Intraosseous Injection of 4% Articaine in Mandibular First Molars With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.QuickSleeper 骨内注射 4% 阿替卡因用于治疗有症状不可复性牙髓炎下颌第一磨牙的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Anesth Prog. 2024 Sep 9;71(3):123-130. doi: 10.2344/363591.
9
The significance of needle deflection in success of the inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis.不可逆性牙髓炎患者下牙槽神经阻滞成功中针头偏斜的意义。
J Endod. 2003 Oct;29(10):630-3. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200310000-00004.
10
Effect of intraosseous injection versus inferior alveolar nerve block as primary pulpal anaesthesia of mandibular posterior teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a prospective randomized clinical trial.骨内注射与下牙槽神经阻滞作为有症状的不可逆性牙髓炎下颌后牙牙髓初次麻醉方法的效果:一项前瞻性随机临床试验
Acta Odontol Scand. 2018 Aug;76(6):442-447. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2018.1428826. Epub 2018 Jan 27.

本文引用的文献

1
The use of mandibular nerve block in unilateral mandibular fracture to evaluate the mouth opening for assessment of airway.在下颌骨单侧骨折中使用下颌神经阻滞来评估开口度以进行气道评估。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2022 Apr-Jun;16(2):194-199. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_773_21. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
2
A Systematic Review on Nerve-Related Adverse Effects following Mandibular Nerve Block Anesthesia.一项关于下颌神经阻滞麻醉后与神经相关的不良反应的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 31;19(3):1627. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031627.
3
Comparative Evaluation of Classical Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block and Gow-gates Nerve Block for Surgical Removal of Mandibular Third Molar: A Prospective Study.
经典下牙槽神经阻滞与Gow - gates神经阻滞用于下颌第三磨牙手术拔除的比较评估:一项前瞻性研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Nov;13(Suppl 2):S1011-S1014. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_279_21. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
4
Intravenous cannula used for continuous intraoral mandibular nerve block in trigeminal neuralgia.用于三叉神经痛连续口腔内下颌神经阻滞的静脉套管针。
BMJ Case Rep. 2021 Mar 18;14(3):e240368. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-240368.
5
Alternative techniques for failure of conventional inferior alveolar nerve block.传统下牙槽神经阻滞失败的替代技术。
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Jun;19(3):125-134. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2019.19.3.125. Epub 2019 Jun 30.
6
Prospective clinical study comparing intraligamentary anesthesia and inferior alveolar nerve block for extraction of posterior mandibular teeth.一项比较后牙临床应用结扎内麻醉和下齿槽神经阻滞麻醉的前瞻性临床研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Apr;22(3):1469-1475. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2248-2. Epub 2017 Oct 15.
7
Alternative to the inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia when placing mandibular dental implants posterior to the mental foramen.在下颌骨颏孔后方植入下颌牙种植体时,可替代下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉的方法。
J Oral Implantol. 2001;27(3):127-33. doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0127:ATTIAN>2.3.CO;2.