Silvestrini B
Agents Actions. 1986 Jan;17(3-4):329-37. doi: 10.1007/BF01982638.
In contrast to the approach focusing on aspirin and cortisone as models for research, a physiopathologically-oriented approach provides the rationale for developing animal models suitable for detecting anti-inflammatory agents with a profile of therapeutic and side effects unlike that of currently used drugs. The so-called 'primary' anti-inflammatory agents have a marked efficacy in animal models of acute inflammation and lack significant anti-PG effects. Clinically, they relieve the symptoms of acute inflammatory conditions, both topically and systemically, are practically inactive in rheumatic disorders and have a profile of side-effects different from that of aspirin or cortisone. Available data suggest that their characteristic profile of side and therapeutic effects reflect qualitative, rather than quantitative differences, from aspirin and cortisone. The so-called 'secondary' anti-inflammatory agents affect the conditioning factors for some inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, rather than the inflammatory process itself. Besides the derangement of the immune system and the consequent development of immunomodulators, the role of specific protein changes as a conditioning factor is discussed and animal models are illustrated focusing on this phenomenon. The possibility is also discussed that protein denaturation is not only responsible for the formation of new antigenic determinants, but also for necrotic lesions accompanying some inflammatory disorders. Results obtained with animal models of conditioned inflammation with marked necrotic lesions are presented. The interest for this approach is that conditioning factors for inflammation appear a more specific target for drug treatment, rather than inflammation itself.
与将阿司匹林和可的松作为研究模型的方法不同,一种以病理生理学为导向的方法为开发动物模型提供了理论依据,这些动物模型适用于检测具有不同于目前所用药物的治疗和副作用特征的抗炎药。所谓的“主要”抗炎药在急性炎症动物模型中具有显著疗效,且缺乏明显的抗前列腺素作用。在临床上,它们在局部和全身都能缓解急性炎症症状,在风湿性疾病中实际上没有活性,并且具有与阿司匹林或可的松不同的副作用特征。现有数据表明,它们独特的副作用和治疗效果特征反映了与阿司匹林和可的松在性质上而非数量上的差异。所谓的“次要”抗炎药影响某些炎症性疾病(包括类风湿性关节炎)的调节因素,而不是炎症过程本身。除了免疫系统的紊乱以及随之而来的免疫调节剂的发展之外,还讨论了特定蛋白质变化作为调节因素的作用,并举例说明了关注这一现象的动物模型。还讨论了蛋白质变性不仅是新抗原决定簇形成的原因,也是某些炎症性疾病伴随的坏死性病变的原因这一可能性。展示了在具有明显坏死性病变的条件性炎症动物模型中获得的结果。这种方法的意义在于,炎症的调节因素似乎是药物治疗的一个更具体的靶点,而不是炎症本身。