Baluku Walter Nehemiah, Tabusibwa Barbara Eva Kirunda, Wasswa Ronald, Tsadik Shishay, Henry Stella Guwoly, Babughirana Geoffrey, Kananura Rornald Muhumuza
Child Relief and Support Fund, Juba, South Sudan.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
BMC Nutr. 2024 Dec 3;10(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s40795-024-00963-6.
Preventive nutrition interventions (PNI) are usually implemented without understanding how multilevel factors affect uptake. Undernutrition is defined as inadequate intake of nutritious foods. Pastoral populations in conflict settings are seen to have low uptake. The study assessed the level and multiple factors influencing the uptake of PNI in caregivers of under 5 in Kapoeta South County of South Sudan.
A quantitative approach was employed with an element of a qualitative in a socio-ecological framework. A total of 405 caretakers of CU5 were selected to respond to quantitative household interviews, while qualitative data was collected using KIIs. Primary data were collected through structured questionnaires, which were used to attain quantitative data. The data collected through the method of KII were of qualitative type. Using deductive thematic analysis approach, the quantitative data were coded into personal, interpersonal, and community-level factors, and the analysis was done using STATA software version 16. A technique for constructing the uptake level as low, medium, or high was factor analysis. With the result of the binary logistic regression to determine association. Furthermore, semi-structured KIIs were conducted and the qualitative information analyzed thematically to elaborate on the quantitative results.
The uptake level of the Preventive Nutrition Interventions (PNIs) was low at 51. 4%. In the socioecological system, facilitators and barriers related to this uptake differed across the benchmarks of that model. At the community level however, lack of a health facility within the community (OR = 1. 63, C. I. = 1. 02-2. 59) and the time taken before one can access a health facility (OR = 1. 70, C. I = 1. 30-2. 23) showed that accessibility could encourage uptake of PNIs. In the interpersonal dimension, joint decision makers at the family level (OR = 0. 31, C. I = 0. 19-0. 50) had higher uptake. Three factors at the individual level revealed that low uptake was inversely related to caregivers' knowledge of PNIs (OR = 0. 16, C. I. = 0. 10-0. 25), but positively related to having an undernourished child (OR = 2. 59, C. I. = 1. 73-3. 89), as well as number of children in the household (OR = 0. 40, C. I. = 0. 26). KIIs validate that undernutrition and practical issues were the main determinant of PNI uptake.
This study found that caretakers of children under 5 years reported low knowledge of and uptake to preventive nutrition interventions (PNIs) among the pastoral population in South Sudan. Based on the proposed socioecological model, we recommend that PNI approaches need to target multiple levels. At the community level, the focus is on improving access to health facilities and reducing the travel time to these facilities. Another way to increase intervention uptake is to improve spousal-supported joint decisions at the interpersonal level. Enhancing the awareness of the target audience and providing them with relevant information can impact the utilization rates of PNIs at the individual level. Therefore, nutrition stakeholders should employ an approach that targets community, interpersonal, and individual levels with the purpose of increasing PNI uptake.
预防性营养干预措施(PNI)的实施通常未考虑多层次因素如何影响其接受程度。营养不良被定义为营养丰富食物的摄入量不足。冲突地区的牧民群体对PNI的接受程度较低。本研究评估了南苏丹卡波埃塔南县5岁以下儿童照料者对PNI的接受程度及多种影响因素。
采用定量研究方法,并在社会生态框架中融入定性研究元素。共选取405名5岁以下儿童的照料者进行定量家庭访谈,同时使用关键信息访谈(KIIs)收集定性数据。通过结构化问卷收集原始数据以获取定量数据,通过KII方法收集的数据为定性数据。采用演绎主题分析方法,将定量数据编码为个人、人际和社区层面的因素,并使用STATA 16软件进行分析。通过因子分析构建接受程度为低、中或高的技术。利用二元逻辑回归结果确定关联。此外,进行了半结构化KIIs,并对定性信息进行主题分析以阐述定量结果。
预防性营养干预措施(PNIs)的接受程度较低,为51.4%。在社会生态系统中,与这种接受程度相关的促进因素和障碍在该模型的不同基准中有所不同。然而,在社区层面,社区内缺乏卫生设施(OR = 1.63,置信区间 = 1.02 - 2.59)以及前往卫生设施所需的时间(OR = 1.70,置信区间 = 1.30 - 2.23)表明,可及性可促进PNIs的接受。在人际层面,家庭层面的联合决策者(OR = 0.31,置信区间 = 0.19 - 0.50)接受程度较高。个体层面的三个因素表明,接受程度低与照料者对PNIs的了解呈负相关(OR = 0.16,置信区间 = 0.10 - 0.25),但与家中有营养不良儿童呈正相关(OR = 2.59,置信区间 = 1.73 - 3.89),以及与家庭儿童数量呈正相关(OR = 0.40,置信区间 = 0.26)。KIIs证实营养不良和实际问题是PNI接受程度的主要决定因素。
本研究发现,南苏丹牧民群体中5岁以下儿童的照料者对预防性营养干预措施(PNIs)的了解和接受程度较低。基于所提出的社会生态模型,我们建议PNI方法需要针对多个层面。在社区层面,重点是改善卫生设施的可及性并减少前往这些设施的时间。增加干预措施接受程度的另一种方法是在人际层面改善配偶支持的联合决策。提高目标受众的意识并向他们提供相关信息可影响个体层面PNIs的利用率。因此,营养利益相关者应采用针对社区、人际和个体层面的方法,以提高PNI的接受程度。