Freeman Michael H, Patro Ankita, Lindquist Nathan R, Berg Katelyn A, Holder Jourdan T, O'Malley Matthew R, Tawfik Kareem O, Jan Taha A, Perkins Elizabeth L, Moberly Aaron C, Haynes David S, Bennett Marc L
The Otology Group, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Department of Otolaryngology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Otol Neurotol. 2025 Jan 1;46(1):54-59. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004375. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
To assess the factors that drive a patient's selection of cochlear implant (CI) manufacturer.
Prospective survey study.
Tertiary referral center.
One hundred twenty-eight adult patients undergoing primary CI.
Survey administered in the preoperative area.
Sources of information regarding CI manufacturer offerings, factors that were most important in deciding on a manufacturer, and manufacturer ultimately selected.
One hundred twenty-eight patients were included (average age, 63.7 years; 97% White). The most cited source of information that patients used to choose a device was his/her audiologist (80.5% of patients). When asked his/her number 1 reason for choosing their CI manufacturer, the most commonly cited reason was technology (e.g., battery life, device pairing), regardless of manufacturer. When asked about specific technology offerings, hearing aid pairing was rated as the most important. The numbers 2 and 3 reasons for choosing a manufacturer were cosmetics/structure of the wearable portion of the device and audiologist recommendation of that manufacturer, respectively. The relative weight given to each of the top 3 reasons differed significantly across the three manufacturers ( p = 0.017).
Audiologists are by far the leading source of information used by patients choosing a CI manufacturer. Patients prioritize technology most when choosing an implant manufacturer, but audiologist recommendation and the cosmetics and structure of the wearable device are also important. CI manufacturers should be mindful of patient priorities when designing and marketing their devices.
评估促使患者选择人工耳蜗(CI)制造商的因素。
前瞻性调查研究。
三级转诊中心。
128例接受初次人工耳蜗植入的成年患者。
在术前区域进行调查。
关于人工耳蜗制造商产品的信息来源、在决定选择制造商时最重要的因素以及最终选择的制造商。
纳入128例患者(平均年龄63.7岁;97%为白人)。患者选择设备时最常提及的信息来源是其听力学家(80.5%的患者)。当被问及选择人工耳蜗制造商的首要原因时,最常提及的原因是技术(如电池续航、设备配对),与制造商无关。当问及具体的技术产品时,助听器配对被评为最重要。选择制造商的第二和第三大原因分别是设备可穿戴部分的外观/结构以及听力学家对该制造商的推荐。三大制造商对前三大原因的相对重视程度存在显著差异(p = 0.017)。
到目前为止,听力学家是患者选择人工耳蜗制造商时使用的主要信息来源。患者在选择植入制造商时最看重技术,但听力学家的推荐以及可穿戴设备的外观和结构也很重要。人工耳蜗制造商在设计和营销其设备时应考虑患者的优先事项。