Tang Gonglin, Yang Rui, Sun Jianing, Zhang Feng, Wu Jitao, Zhao Hongwei
Department of Urology, Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital, Dongying, China.
Am J Mens Health. 2024 Nov-Dec;18(6):15579883241302045. doi: 10.1177/15579883241302045.
The objectives of this study were to evaluate and compare the application of freehand transperineal prostate biopsy (FTPB) under local anesthesia (LA) versus systematic transperineal prostate biopsy (STPB) in an outpatient setting without antibiotics. A total of 218 biopsy-naive patients with suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) were retrospectively analyzed. Suspicious areas on mpMRI were graded using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS v2.1). FTPB was performed for each suspicious lesion, followed by a 12-core STPB under LA. Histopathological outcomes, complications, and tolerability were recorded. The results showed that PCa was detected in 129 (59.17%) patients, with 104 (47.71%) being clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). There was agreement between FTPB and STPB in 94 (72.88%) patients. FTPB diagnosed fewer PCa cases but more csPCa cases than STPB. LA-FTPB was well-tolerated with no severe complications. The conclusions suggest that FTPB under LA in an outpatient setting without antibiotics is safe, feasible, and efficient.
本研究的目的是评估和比较在不使用抗生素的门诊环境下,局部麻醉(LA)下的徒手经会阴前列腺穿刺活检(FTPB)与系统性经会阴前列腺穿刺活检(STPB)的应用情况。对总共218例基于多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)怀疑患有前列腺癌(PCa)且此前未进行过活检的患者进行了回顾性分析。使用前列腺影像报告和数据系统第2.1版(PI-RADS v2.1)对mpMRI上的可疑区域进行分级。对每个可疑病变进行FTPB,随后在局部麻醉下进行12针STPB。记录组织病理学结果、并发症和耐受性。结果显示,129例(59.17%)患者检测出PCa,其中104例(47.71%)为临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)。94例(72.88%)患者的FTPB和STPB结果一致。与STPB相比,FTPB诊断出的PCa病例较少,但csPCa病例较多。局部麻醉下的FTPB耐受性良好,无严重并发症。结论表明,在不使用抗生素的门诊环境下进行局部麻醉下的FTPB是安全、可行且有效的。