Groeger John A, Lo June C-Y, Santhi Nayantara, Lazar Alpar S, Dijk Derk-Jan
Department of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Centre for Sleep and Cognition, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Aug 17;16:911994. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.911994. eCollection 2022.
Laboratory-based sleep manipulations show asymmetries between positive and negative affect, but say little about how more specific moods might change. We report extensive analyzes of items from the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) during days following nights of chronic sleep restriction (6 h sleep opportunity), during 40 h of acute sleep deprivation under constant routine conditions, and during a week-long forced desynchrony protocol in which participants lived on a 28-h day. Living in the laboratory resulted in medium effects sizes on all positive moods (Attentiveness, General Positive Affect, Joviality, Assuredness), with a general deterioration as the days wore on. These effects were not found with negative moods. Sleep restriction reduced some positive moods, particularly Attentiveness (also General Positive), and increased Hostility. A burden of chronic sleep loss also led to lower positive moods when participants confronted the acute sleep loss challenge, and all positive moods, as well as Fearfulness, General Negative Affect and Hostility were affected. Sleeping at atypical circadian phases resulted in mood changes: all positive moods reduced, Hostility and General Negative Affect increased. Deteriorations increased the further participants slept from their typical nocturnal sleep. In most cases the changes induced by chronic or acute sleep loss or mistimed sleep waxed or waned across the waking day, with linear or various non-linear trends best fitting these time-awake-based changes. While extended laboratory stays do not emulate the fluctuating emotional demands of everyday living, these findings demonstrate that even in controlled settings mood changes systematically as sleep is shortened or mistimed.
基于实验室的睡眠操控显示出积极情绪和消极情绪之间的不对称性,但对于更具体的情绪可能如何变化却鲜有提及。我们报告了对积极和消极情绪量表(PANAS)项目的广泛分析,这些分析涵盖了慢性睡眠限制(6小时睡眠机会)后的夜晚之后的几天、在恒定日常条件下40小时急性睡眠剥夺期间以及在为期一周的强制时差协议期间,在此协议中参与者按照28小时的一天生活。生活在实验室中对所有积极情绪(专注度、总体积极情绪、愉悦度、自信度)产生中等效应量,且随着时间推移普遍恶化。消极情绪则未发现此类效应。睡眠限制降低了一些积极情绪,尤其是专注度(以及总体积极情绪),并增加了敌意。当参与者面临急性睡眠剥夺挑战时,慢性睡眠缺失的负担也导致积极情绪降低,所有积极情绪以及恐惧、总体消极情绪和敌意均受到影响。在非典型昼夜节律阶段睡眠导致情绪变化:所有积极情绪降低,敌意和总体消极情绪增加。参与者偏离其典型夜间睡眠的程度越大,情绪恶化越严重。在大多数情况下,慢性或急性睡眠缺失或睡眠时机不当所引发的变化在清醒日中呈增强或减弱趋势,线性或各种非线性趋势最能拟合这些基于清醒时间的变化。虽然长时间待在实验室无法模拟日常生活中波动的情绪需求,但这些发现表明,即使在受控环境中当睡眠被缩短或时机不当,情绪也会系统性地变化。