Dischiavi Steven, Perry Jesse, Burk Connor, Chiang Jeremy, Bleakley Chris
Physical Therapy High Point University.
Physical Therapy University of Ulster.
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2024 Dec 1;19(12):1532-1540. doi: 10.26603/001c.126062. eCollection 2024.
Traditional methods to measure rotational passive range of motion (PROM) in the throwing shoulder do not reflect the complexity of the throwing motion. Therefore, a sport specific shoulder rotation PROM test (FAST-SHDR) was developed and compared to traditional standard methods to measure shoulder internal and external rotational PROM in the throwing shoulder.
The aim of this study was to determine the intra-rater reliability of the FAST-SHDR test in young, healthy, male Division 1 baseball players.
Reliability and validity analysis.
A study with 49 healthy participants (31 collegiate baseball players, 18 controls) examined a sport specific shoulder rotation PROM test (FAST-SHDR) and compared this to the standard supine 90/90 shoulder in a single session assessment. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC) were calculated. Within and between group differences were based on t-tests (p<0.001), absolute differences and effect sizes (95% CIs).
The novel test (FAST-SHDR) had good to excellent reliability with ICCs ranging from 0.95 (0.89 to 0.98) to 0.96 (0.92-0.98). MDC ranged from 7°-11° which is equivalent to 11-14% of mean PROM scores. In the dominant shoulder of baseballers, when FAST-SHDR IR/ER was compared to standard IR/ER testing the FAST-SHDR scores were lower for both IR (MD 23.3°; 95% CI 19.7-26.8) and ER (MD 50.7°; 95% 44.7 to 56.7). Comparing the shoulder rotation PROM in baseballers, the FAST-SHDR ER and IR measurements were significantly lower (p<0.0001) when compared to traditional standard PROM testing for shoulder IR and ER rotation.
FAST-SHDR testing shows good to excellent intra-rater reliability for measuring shoulder rotational PROM and demonstrates both face and discriminant validity.
测量投掷肩旋转被动活动度(PROM)的传统方法无法反映投掷动作的复杂性。因此,开发了一种针对特定运动的肩部旋转PROM测试(FAST-SHDR),并将其与测量投掷肩内旋和外旋PROM的传统标准方法进行比较。
本研究的目的是确定FAST-SHDR测试在年轻、健康的一级男子棒球运动员中的评分者内信度。
信度和效度分析。
一项针对49名健康参与者(31名大学棒球运动员,18名对照组)的研究,在单次评估中检查了一种针对特定运动的肩部旋转PROM测试(FAST-SHDR),并将其与标准仰卧位90/90肩部测试进行比较。计算了组内相关系数(ICC)、测量标准误差(SEM)和最小可检测变化(MDC)。组内和组间差异基于t检验(p<0.001)、绝对差异和效应大小(95%置信区间)。
新测试(FAST-SHDR)具有良好到优秀的信度,ICC范围为0.95(0.89至0.98)至0.96(0.92 - 0.98)。MDC范围为7° - 11°,相当于平均PROM分数的11 - 14%。在棒球运动员的优势肩中,当将FAST-SHDR内旋/外旋与标准内旋/外旋测试进行比较时,FAST-SHDR内旋(平均差23.3°;95%置信区间19.7 - 26.8)和外旋(平均差50.7°;95%置信区间44.7至56.7)的分数均较低。比较棒球运动员的肩部旋转PROM,与传统标准PROM测试的肩部内旋和外旋相比,FAST-SHDR外旋和内旋测量值显著更低(p<0.0001)。
FAST-SHDR测试在测量肩部旋转PROM方面显示出良好到优秀的评分者内信度,并证明了表面效度和区分效度。
3级。