Morris Lucinda, Turner Sandra, Phillips Jane L, Parmar Anamika, Agar Meera
University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Faculty of Health, Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Ultimo, NSW, Australia.
St George Cancer Care Centre, St George Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2024 Nov 10;32:100288. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100288. eCollection 2024 Dec.
To identify potential gaps in geriatric radiation oncology (RO) education worldwide, as measured by geriatric oncology (GO) content within postgraduate RO training program (TP) curricula across 8 focus countries.
The need for improved education around GO is internationally recognized and is a key strategic priority of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG).Two reviewers undertook a systematic scoping review from March to September 2023. Focus countries were selected using predefined selection criteria based on national radiation therapy (RT) service provision, RT access and post-graduate specialty training standards. This review is in accordance with evidence-based curriculum design methodology and represents the initial phase i.e., problem identification and needs assessment.
Overall RO TP and curriculum elements varied by jurisdiction. Common elements included length of training, summative assessments and prerequisite requirements. Considerable variability exists across TPs around identified learning outcomes, content, TP organization, training networks and accreditation.Across 6 TPs, only 2 had any documented GO curriculum content. Of these, only one contained geriatric RO content scoring moderate to high based on accepted quality benchmarks. Outside official RO TPs, there is considerable GO online education content, including face to face courses, peer-reviewed articles, learning materials and resources relevant to RO postgraduate training worldwide. However accessibility to these learning interventions may be region specific and content is not standardized.
As expected, this systematic scoping review has identified significant gaps in GO education within RO TPs worldwide. These findings represent an essential step in the development of evidence-based recommendations for updating standards for GO training within RO training programs and establishing a globally accepted, standardized benchmarks for minimal geriatric RO education. In turn, this will ensure future radiation oncologists are able to deliver a high standard of care to and improve outcomes for older people with cancer.
通过对8个重点国家研究生放射肿瘤学(RO)培训项目(TP)课程中的老年肿瘤学(GO)内容进行评估,确定全球老年放射肿瘤学教育中潜在的差距。
国际上已认识到围绕老年肿瘤学改善教育的必要性,这是国际老年肿瘤学会(SIOG)的一项关键战略重点。两名评审员在2023年3月至9月进行了系统的范围界定审查。根据国家放射治疗(RT)服务提供情况、RT可及性和研究生专业培训标准,使用预先确定的选择标准选择重点国家。本审查符合循证课程设计方法,代表了初始阶段,即问题识别和需求评估。
总体而言,RO TP和课程要素因管辖范围而异。共同要素包括培训时长、总结性评估和先决条件要求。在已确定的学习成果、内容、TP组织、培训网络和认证方面,各TP之间存在相当大的差异。在6个TP中,只有2个有任何记录在案的GO课程内容。其中,只有一个包含基于公认质量基准得分中等至较高的老年RO内容。在官方RO TP之外,有大量的GO在线教育内容,包括面对面课程、同行评审文章、学习材料以及与全球RO研究生培训相关的资源。然而,这些学习干预措施的可及性可能因地区而异,且内容未标准化。
正如预期的那样,这项系统的范围界定审查发现全球RO TP中的GO教育存在重大差距。这些发现是制定循证建议的重要一步,这些建议用于更新RO培训项目中的GO培训标准,并建立全球公认的、最低限度老年RO教育的标准化基准。反过来,这将确保未来的放射肿瘤学家能够为老年癌症患者提供高标准的护理并改善其治疗效果。