Smith Michele E, Gray Meghan, Wilson Patrick T
Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester Medical Center Golisano Children's Hospital, Rochester, New York, United States.
Division of Critical Care and Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, New York, United States.
J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2023 Jan 13;13(3):296-302. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1760634. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is a form of noninvasive ventilation used to support pediatric patients with acute respiratory infections. Traditional CPAP interfaces have been associated with inadequate seal, mucocutaneous injury, and aerosolization of infectious particles. The helmet interface may be advantageous given its ability to create a complete seal, avoid skin breakdown, and decrease aerosolization of viruses. We aim to measure tolerability and safety in a pediatric population in the United States and ascertain feedback from parents and health care providers. We performed a prospective, open-label, single-armed feasibility study to assess tolerability and safety of helmet CPAP. Pediatric patients 1 month to 5 years of age admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit with pulmonary infections who were on CPAP for at least 2 hours were eligible. The primary outcome was percentage of patients tolerating helmet CPAP for 4 hours. Secondary measures included the rate of adverse events and change in vital signs. Qualitative feedback was obtained from families, nurses, and respiratory therapists. Five patients were enrolled and 100% tolerated helmet CPAP the full 4-hour study period. No adverse events or significant vital sign changes were observed. All family members preferred to continue the helmet interface, nursing staff noted it made cares easier, and respiratory therapists felt the set up was easy. Helmet CPAP in pediatric patients is well-tolerated, safe, and accepted by medical staff and families in the United States future randomized controlled trials measuring its effectiveness compared with traditional CPAP interfaces are needed.
持续气道正压通气(CPAP)是一种用于支持患有急性呼吸道感染的儿科患者的无创通气形式。传统的CPAP接口存在密封不足、黏膜皮肤损伤以及感染性颗粒雾化等问题。头盔接口可能具有优势,因为它能够实现完全密封、避免皮肤破损并减少病毒雾化。我们旨在测量美国儿科人群对其的耐受性和安全性,并确定家长和医护人员的反馈。我们进行了一项前瞻性、开放标签、单臂可行性研究,以评估头盔式CPAP的耐受性和安全性。入住儿科重症监护病房、患有肺部感染且使用CPAP至少2小时的1个月至5岁儿科患者符合条件。主要结局是耐受头盔式CPAP 4小时的患者百分比。次要指标包括不良事件发生率和生命体征变化。从家庭、护士和呼吸治疗师处获得了定性反馈。招募了5名患者,在为期4小时的研究期间,100%的患者耐受头盔式CPAP。未观察到不良事件或生命体征的显著变化。所有家庭成员都倾向于继续使用头盔接口,护理人员指出这使护理更轻松,呼吸治疗师认为设置很容易。美国儿科患者使用头盔式CPAP耐受性良好、安全,且得到了医护人员和家庭的认可,未来需要进行随机对照试验来衡量其与传统CPAP接口相比的有效性。