Malisorn Saran
Orthopaedics, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, THA.
Cureus. 2024 Dec 2;16(12):e74953. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74953. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) is the second most common nerve entrapment syndrome of the upper extremity after carpal tunnel syndrome. In situ decompression (ISD) and ulnar nerve transposition (UNT) are the major surgery methods in practice for the treatment of CuTS. However, controversies exist over the efficacy and safety of these methods.
The objective of the study was to compare the short- and long-term clinical outcomes in patients treated with ISD and UNT surgery.
This was a retrospective study comprising 56 patients who underwent either ISD or UNT at Naresuan University Hospital between January 2013 and December 2022. Data on age, sex, hand involved, duration of the surgery, duration of the symptoms including the clinical outcomes such as elbow range of motion (ROM), quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (QuickDASH), McGowan grade (MGG), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain scores, motor and sensory conduction velocity (MCV1, MCV2, and SCV), and Tinel's sign were collected during the two-week, one-month, three-month, and six-month follow-ups post-surgery.
Of the 56 patients in the study, 62.5% were female. The number of patients aged <60 years was higher in both groups. The mean age of patients in the ISD group was 49.07±6.13 years, while in the UNT group, it was 51.5±7.04 years. After one month, 53.57% and 32.14% of the patients recovered to MGG 1 in the ISD and UNT groups, respectively. The majority of the patients had MGG 1 six months after the surgery. The QuickDASH score and pain scores of the patients improved during all follow-ups, but no statistical significance was revealed when the two techniques were compared.
The study found that both the ISD and UNT were efficient and safe in treating CuTS. Further study with the inclusion of parameters such as revision surgery and complications would be vital.
肘管综合征(CuTS)是上肢仅次于腕管综合征的第二常见神经卡压综合征。原位减压(ISD)和尺神经转位术(UNT)是目前治疗CuTS的主要手术方法。然而,这些方法的疗效和安全性存在争议。
本研究旨在比较接受ISD和UNT手术患者的短期和长期临床结局。
这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了2013年1月至2022年12月期间在那黎宣大学医院接受ISD或UNT手术的56例患者。收集患者的年龄、性别、患侧手、手术时长、症状持续时间等数据,包括术后两周、一个月、三个月和六个月随访时的临床结局,如肘关节活动范围(ROM)、手臂、肩部和手部快速残疾评估量表(QuickDASH)、麦高恩分级(MGG)、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、运动和感觉传导速度(MCV1、MCV2和SCV)以及Tinel征。
本研究的56例患者中,62.5%为女性。两组中年龄<60岁的患者数量较多。ISD组患者的平均年龄为49.07±6.13岁,而UNT组为51.5±7.04岁。术后一个月,ISD组和UNT组分别有53.57%和32.14%的患者恢复至MGG 1级。大多数患者在术后六个月时达到MGG 1级。所有随访期间患者的QuickDASH评分和疼痛评分均有所改善,但比较两种技术时未发现统计学差异。
研究发现,ISD和UNT治疗CuTS均有效且安全。纳入翻修手术和并发症等参数的进一步研究至关重要。