• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同手术方式治疗女性压力性尿失禁疗效的比较分析:一项多中心回顾性研究

Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Different Surgical Modalities for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Jiang Zhuo, Yuan Chaoyan

机构信息

Department of Medical School, Hubei Minzu University, Enshi, Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Hubei, People's Republic of China.

Department of Gynecology, Minda Hospital of Hubei Minzu University, Enshi, Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Hubei, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int J Womens Health. 2024 Nov 29;16:2051-2063. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S488235. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.2147/IJWH.S488235
PMID:39629298
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11613724/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of autologous fascial retropubic midurethral sling, anterior vaginal wall epithelial flap midurethral suspension, tension-free vaginal tape-obturator and adjustable urethral suspension with a single incision for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 243 SUI patients who were admitted to Minda Hospital of Hubei Minzu University, were chosen and split into four groups based on various surgical techniques: the AFS group (59 cases), TVT-O group (61 cases), epithelial flap group (62 cases) and ASIS group (61 cases). A comparison of four patient groups' quality-of-life scores, urodynamic indices, urethral structure-related indices before and a year after treatment, complication rates and perioperative-related indices.

RESULTS

There was no discernible difference in the treatment outcomes among the four groups(P>0.05). However, the ASIS group exhibited significantly reduced intraoperative hemorrhage, hospitalization duration and operative time compared to the mucosal flap and TVT-O groups(P<0.05). Both the TVT-O and ASIS groups demonstrated significantly higher hospitalization expenditures than the mucosal flap and AFS groups (P<0.05). No significant differences were observed in postoperative indwelling catheterization, IIQ-7 and I-QOL ratings, urodynamic indices or urethral structure-related indexes across the four patient groups(P>0.05). The TVT-O group showed a significantly higher incidence of postoperative medial thigh pain compared to the AFS, mucosal flap, and ASIS groups(P<0.05). Similarly, the AFS group had a significantly greater incidence of postoperative urine retention compared to the mucosal flap, TVT-O, and ASIS groups(P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

While all four surgical techniques demonstrated good efficacy and improved patients' quality of life, our study suggests that TVT-O had a significantly higher incidence of post-treatment medial thigh pain and ASIS may be a safer and less problematic surgical approach for the treatment of female SUI. This has important therapeutic implications.

摘要

目的

比较自体筋膜耻骨后尿道中段悬吊术、阴道前壁上皮瓣尿道中段悬吊术、经闭孔无张力尿道中段吊带术及单切口可调节尿道悬吊术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的疗效。

材料与方法

选取湖北民族大学附属民大医院收治的243例压力性尿失禁患者,根据不同手术方式分为四组:自体筋膜耻骨后尿道中段悬吊术(AFS)组59例、经闭孔无张力尿道中段吊带术(TVT-O)组61例、上皮瓣组62例、单切口可调节尿道悬吊术(ASIS)组61例。比较四组患者治疗前及治疗1年后的生活质量评分、尿动力学指标、尿道结构相关指标、并发症发生率及围手术期相关指标。

结果

四组治疗效果差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。然而,与黏膜瓣组和TVT-O组相比,ASIS组术中出血量、住院时间及手术时间明显减少(P<0.05)。TVT-O组和ASIS组的住院费用均明显高于黏膜瓣组和AFS组(P<0.05)。四组患者术后留置导尿时间、IIQ-7和I-QOL评分、尿动力学指标及尿道结构相关指标差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与AFS组、黏膜瓣组和ASIS组相比,TVT-O组术后大腿内侧疼痛发生率明显更高(P<0.05)。同样,与黏膜瓣组、TVT-O组和ASIS组相比,AFS组术后尿潴留发生率明显更高(P<0.05)。

结论

虽然四种手术方式均显示出良好的疗效并改善了患者的生活质量,但本研究表明,TVT-O术后大腿内侧疼痛发生率明显更高,而ASIS可能是治疗女性压力性尿失禁更安全、问题更少的手术方式。这具有重要的治疗意义。

相似文献

1
Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Different Surgical Modalities for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.不同手术方式治疗女性压力性尿失禁疗效的比较分析:一项多中心回顾性研究
Int J Womens Health. 2024 Nov 29;16:2051-2063. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S488235. eCollection 2024.
2
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.女性尿失禁的单切口吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 26;7(7):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub3.
3
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.女性尿失禁的单切口吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 1(6):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub2.
4
Trans-obturator urethral sling for the surgical correction of female stress urinary incontinence: outside-in (Monarc) versus inside-out (TVT-O). Are the two ways reassuring?经闭孔尿道悬吊带术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的手术矫正:由外向内(Monarc)与由内向外(TVT-O)。两种方法是否可靠?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Aug;133(2):232-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.05.015. Epub 2006 Jun 21.
5
Comparison of the efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape obturator (TVT-O) and single-incision tension-free vaginal tape (Ajust™) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a 1-year follow-up randomized trial.无张力阴道吊带闭孔术(TVT-O)与单切口无张力阴道吊带(Ajust™)治疗女性压力性尿失禁的疗效比较:一项为期1年的随访随机试验。
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Oct;27(10):1497-505. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3012-x. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
6
Single-incision mini-slings versus standard synthetic mid-urethral slings for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: The SIMS RCT.单切口微型吊带与标准合成中段尿道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的比较:SIMS RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Dec;26(47):1-190. doi: 10.3310/BTSA6148.
7
Transvaginal Retropubic Versus Transobturator Midurethral Sling in the Treatment of Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence.经阴道耻骨后与经闭孔尿道中段吊带术治疗复发性压力性尿失禁的比较
Cureus. 2024 Dec 27;16(12):e76480. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76480. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
Comparison of three kinds of mid-urethral slings for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.三种经阴道无张力尿道中段悬吊带术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的比较
Urologia. 2010 Jan-Mar;77(1):37-41; discussion 42.
9
[Clinical study on tension-free vaginal tape and tension-free vaginal tape obturator for surgical treatment of severe stress urinary incontinence].无张力阴道吊带术及无张力阴道吊带闭孔术治疗重度压力性尿失禁的临床研究
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Mar;43(3):180-4.
10
Clinical efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape-ischiopubic ramus versus transobturator tension-free vaginal tape in the management of female stress urinary incontinence.耻骨支无张力阴道吊带术与经闭孔无张力阴道吊带术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的临床疗效比较
Technol Health Care. 2025;33(1):545-554. doi: 10.3233/THC-241247.

本文引用的文献

1
Synthetic vs nonsynthetic slings for female stress and mixed urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.合成吊带与非合成吊带治疗女性压力性和混合性尿失禁的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Aug;231(2):166-186.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.02.306. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
2
The effect of injectable platelet rich fibrin as a nonsurgical treatment of the female stress urinary incontinence.注射用富血小板纤维蛋白作为女性压力性尿失禁非手术治疗方法的效果
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 May;309(5):2229-2236. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07431-3. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
3
Stem-cell therapy in stress urinary incontinence: A review.压力性尿失禁的干细胞治疗:综述
Tzu Chi Med J. 2022 Sep 5;35(2):111-119. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_145_22. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
4
Clinical Outcomes of Mid-Urethral Sling (MUS) Procedures for the Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence: A Multicenter Study.用于治疗女性尿失禁的中段尿道吊带术(MUS)的临床结果:一项多中心研究。
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 9;11(22):6656. doi: 10.3390/jcm11226656.
5
Low Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy as a Novel Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized-Controlled Clinical Study.低强度体外冲击波疗法治疗压力性尿失禁的随机对照临床试验。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Sep 8;57(9):947. doi: 10.3390/medicina57090947.
6
Incidence and risk factors of female urinary incontinence: a 4-year longitudinal study among 24 985 adult women in China.中国 24985 名成年女性 4 年纵向研究女性尿失禁的发生率和危险因素。
BJOG. 2022 Mar;129(4):580-589. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16936. Epub 2021 Oct 17.
7
Comparative Assessment of Female Sexual Function Following Transobturator Midurethral Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence.经闭孔尿道中段吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁后女性性功能的比较评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 25;18(5):2286. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052286.
8
Patient Characteristics that May Influence the Effect of Urethral Injection Therapy for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence.可能影响女性压力性尿失禁尿道注射治疗效果的患者特征。
J Urol. 2019 Jul;202(1):125-131. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000176. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
9
The Midurethral Fascial "Sling on a String": An Alternative to Midurethral Synthetic Tapes in the Era of Mesh Complications.中段筋膜“吊线”:网片并发症时代中替代中段尿道吊带的方法
Eur Urol. 2018 Aug;74(2):191-196. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.04.031. Epub 2018 May 24.
10
Adjustable single-incision mini-slings (Ajust®) versus other slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence: a meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications.可调单切口迷你吊带(Ajust®)与其他吊带在女性压力性尿失禁手术治疗中的比较:有效性和并发症的荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2018 May 18;18(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0357-0.