Hongsakul Keerati, Khantayanuwong Supawut, Sungsiri Jitpreedee, Janjindamai Phurich, Akkakrisee Surasit, Bannangkoon Kittipitch, Rookkapan Sorracha, Boonsrirat Ussanee
Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Dec 4:15266028241292468. doi: 10.1177/15266028241292468.
To date, no direct comparison has been made between the patency rates of drug-eluting stents (DESs) and interwoven stents (IWSs) in addressing hemodialysis access dysfunction. This study aims to directly compare the primary patency rates of DES and IWS in clinically significant vein-graft anastomotic stenosis of arteriovenous grafts (AVGs).
Between January 2015 and October 2022, we enrolled all hemodialysis patients with clinically significant vein-graft anastomotic stenosis of AVGs who presented at our institution. Patient demographics, AVG details, lesion characteristics, and primary patency data for each stent group were systemically recorded. Following this, a Kaplan-Meier analysis of the primary stent patency was performed, with statistical significance set at p<0.05.
A total of 51 patients (19 men and 32 women; mean age=64 years; range=49-79 years) were enrolled. Among them, 16 were treated with DES and 35 were treated with IWS. Notably, the most common stent placement location in each group was the vein-graft anastomosis of the brachioaxillary grafts, and the primary patency rate was monitored over a follow-up period of 24 months. At 6, 12, and 24 months, the primary patency rates for DES vs IWS were 100% vs 62.7%, 91.7% vs 38.8%, and 62.9% vs 21.4%, respectively (p<0.001).
Our findings suggest that DES may be a more effective treatment choice for clinically significant vein-graft anastomotic stenosis in AVGs for hemodialysis access than nondrug-coated IWS.
Drug-eluting stents (DES) have been widely recognized for their efficacy in reducing reintervention rates in coronary and femoropopliteal pathologies. However, their application in managing failing hemodialysis access remains inadequately explored. This study highlights the promising potential of DES in addressing clinically significant vein-graft anastomotic stenosis in hemodialysis arteriovenous grafts (AVG). DES may represent a viable alternative for mitigating substantial immediate recoil stenosis following balloon angioplasty and for preventing early restenosis at the vein-graft anastomosis of AVG, offering a novel therapeutic avenue for future clinical practice.
迄今为止,尚未对药物洗脱支架(DES)和编织支架(IWS)在解决血液透析通路功能障碍方面的通畅率进行直接比较。本研究旨在直接比较DES和IWS在动静脉移植物(AVG)具有临床意义的静脉移植物吻合口狭窄中的原发性通畅率。
2015年1月至2022年10月期间,我们纳入了所有在本机构就诊的患有AVG具有临床意义的静脉移植物吻合口狭窄的血液透析患者。系统记录了每个支架组的患者人口统计学、AVG详细信息、病变特征和原发性通畅数据。在此之后,对原发性支架通畅情况进行了Kaplan-Meier分析,设定统计学显著性为p<0.05。
共纳入51例患者(19例男性和32例女性;平均年龄=64岁;范围=49-79岁)。其中,16例接受DES治疗,35例接受IWS治疗。值得注意的是,每组中最常见的支架置入位置是肱腋移植物的静脉移植物吻合口,并在24个月的随访期内监测原发性通畅率。在6个月、12个月和24个月时,DES与IWS的原发性通畅率分别为100%对vs 62.7%、91.7%对vs 38.8%、62.9%对vs 21.4%(p<0.001)。
我们的研究结果表明,对于血液透析通路的AVG中具有临床意义的静脉移植物吻合口狭窄,DES可能比无药物涂层的IWS是更有效的治疗选择。
药物洗脱支架(DES)因其在降低冠状动脉和股腘动脉病变再干预率方面的疗效而得到广泛认可。然而,它们在处理失败的血液透析通路方面的应用仍未得到充分探索。本研究突出了DES在解决血液透析动静脉移植物(AVG)中具有临床意义的静脉移植物吻合口狭窄方面的潜在前景。DES可能是减轻球囊血管成形术后严重的即刻回缩狭窄以及预防AVG静脉移植物吻合口早期再狭窄的可行替代方法,为未来临床实践提供了一条新的治疗途径。