Goldberg Jason F, deFilippi Christopher R, Lockhart Christopher, McNair Erick R, Sinha Shashank S, Kong Hyesik, Najjar Samer S, Lohmar Brendan J, Tchoukina Inna, Shah Keyur, Feller Erika, Hsu Steven, Rodrigo Maria E, Jang Moonkyoo, Marboe Charles C, Berry Gerald J, Valantine Hannah A, Agbor-Enoh Sean, Shah Palak
Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Falls Church, VA.
College of Engineering and Computing, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
Transplantation. 2025 Jul 1;109(7):1230-1240. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005258. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
Proteomic phenotyping can provide insights into rejection pathophysiology, novel biomarkers, and therapeutic targets.
Within the prospective, multicenter Genomic Research Alliance for Transplantation study, 181 proteins were evaluated from blood drawn at the time of endomyocardial biopsy; protein fold change, logistic regression, and pathway analyses were conducted, with protein discovery adjusted for a 5% false discovery rate.
Among 104 adult heart transplant patients (31% female sex, 53% Black race, median age 52 y), 74 had no rejection, 18 developed acute cellular rejection (ACR), and 12 developed antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Differential expression was found in 2 proteins during ACR (inflammatory proteins CXCL10 and CD5) and 73 proteins during AMR. The most abundant AMR proteins were the heart failure biomarkers N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and suppression of tumorigenicity 2. In univariate logistic regression, odds of identifying ACR on endomyocardial biopsy increased with doubling of CXCL10 (odds ratio [OR] 2.2 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.3-3.6]) and CD5 (OR 4.7 [95% CI, 1.7-12.9]) concentrations, and odds of AMR increased with doubling of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (OR 13.0 [95% CI, 2.7-62.7) and suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (OR 4.8 [95% CI, 2.1-10.7]) concentrations. After multivariable analysis with clinical covariates, these proteins showed similar odds of ACR or AMR on biopsy. Pathway analysis identified T cell-receptor signaling and cell differentiation as key pathways in ACR and cardiovascular disease and cell turnover in AMR.
Proteomic analysis reveals unique biomarkers and biological pathway expression in ACR and AMR. Cardiac injury-associated biomarkers were more pronounced in AMR, whereas inflammatory biomarkers were more pronounced in ACR. Proteomic analysis may provide insights into rejection pathophysiology, detection, and therapy.
蛋白质组学表型分析可为排斥反应的病理生理学、新型生物标志物及治疗靶点提供深入见解。
在一项前瞻性、多中心移植基因组研究联盟的研究中,对心内膜心肌活检时采集的血液中的181种蛋白质进行了评估;进行了蛋白质倍数变化、逻辑回归和通路分析,并对蛋白质发现进行了调整,以控制5%的错误发现率。
在104例成人心脏移植患者中(31%为女性,53%为黑人,中位年龄52岁),74例无排斥反应,18例发生急性细胞排斥反应(ACR),12例发生抗体介导的排斥反应(AMR)。在ACR期间发现2种蛋白质(炎症蛋白CXCL10和CD5)有差异表达,在AMR期间发现73种蛋白质有差异表达。AMR中最丰富的蛋白质是心力衰竭生物标志物N末端B型利钠肽原和抑癌蛋白2。在单变量逻辑回归中,心内膜心肌活检时识别出ACR的几率随着CXCL10浓度加倍(比值比[OR]为2.2[95%置信区间(CI),1.3 - 3.6])和CD5浓度加倍(OR为4.7[95%CI,1.7 - 12.9])而增加,AMR的几率随着N末端B型利钠肽原浓度加倍(OR为13.0[95%CI,2.7 - 62.7])和抑癌蛋白2浓度加倍(OR为4.8[95%CI,2.1 - 10.7])而增加。在对临床协变量进行多变量分析后,这些蛋白质在活检时显示出类似的ACR或AMR几率。通路分析确定T细胞受体信号传导和细胞分化是ACR中的关键通路,而心血管疾病和细胞更新是AMR中的关键通路。
蛋白质组学分析揭示了ACR和AMR中独特的生物标志物和生物通路表达。心脏损伤相关生物标志物在AMR中更为明显,而炎症生物标志物在ACR中更为明显。蛋白质组学分析可能为排斥反应的病理生理学、检测和治疗提供深入见解。