Gentile Pietro, Lee Soo-Ik
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgical Science, ″Tor Vergata″ University, Via Montpellier 1, 0017300133, Rome, Italy.
Academy of International Regenerative Medicine & Surgery Societies (AIRMESS), 1201, Geneva, Switzerland.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Mar;49(5):1193-1204. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04569-y. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
The combined use of micro-needling (MND), growth factors (GFs), and low-level light/laser therapy (LLLT), here identified as photobiostimulation therapy (PBST) and pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF), is a hair loss (HL) treatment that needs to be standardized as it seems to have promising effects on hair regrowth (HR-G).
The study compared the clinical and instrumental results obtained in patients affected by androgenic alopecia (AGA) and HL related to COVID-19 treated using PEMF combined with PBST with those obtained by only PBST.
A multicentric, retrospective, observational, case-control study was conducted. Fifty-three patients were initially enrolled (30 males classified as stages I-III vertex by the Norwood-Hamilton scale, while 23 females classified in stages I-II by the Ludwig scale). Forty patients (20 females and 20 males) were analyzed after exclusion and inclusion criteria assessment. Twenty patients were treated with the combined use of PEMF and PBST (study group - SG) while 20 patients were treated with PBST (control group -CG). The HR-G was evaluated through photography, physician's, and patient's global assessment scales, in addition to standardized phototrichograms, during a short follow-up at T0-baseline, T1-16 weeks.
The promising results in SG patients, represented by a hair count (HC) increase of 14 hairs/0.65 cm at T1 after 16 weeks in the targeted area, compared with the baseline results (41 ± 2 hairs/0.65 cm2 at T1 versus 27 ± 2 hairs/0.65 cm at baseline), were observed using computerized trichograms. There was a statistically significant difference in HR-G (p = 0.0325) compared with an HC increase of 11 ± 2 hairs/0.65 cm in the CG.
The comparison between SG and CG indicated that PEMF combined with PBST was a more efficient strategy in HR-G in terms of HC improvement than PBST alone.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
微针疗法(MND)、生长因子(GFs)以及低强度光/激光疗法(LLLT,在此被认定为光生物刺激疗法(PBST))和脉冲电磁场疗法(PEMF)的联合使用,是一种脱发(HL)治疗方法,鉴于其对毛发再生(HR-G)似乎有显著效果,因此需要进行标准化。
本研究比较了采用PEMF联合PBST治疗雄激素性脱发(AGA)和与新冠病毒疾病相关的HL患者所获得的临床和仪器检测结果,以及仅采用PBST治疗的患者所获得的结果。
开展了一项多中心、回顾性、观察性病例对照研究。最初纳入53例患者(30例男性,根据诺伍德 - 汉密尔顿量表分类为I - III期头顶脱发;23例女性,根据路德维希量表分类为I - II期)。在评估纳入和排除标准后,对40例患者(20例女性和20例男性)进行分析。20例患者接受PEMF和PBST联合治疗(研究组 - SG),20例患者接受PBST治疗(对照组 - CG)。在T0基线、T1 - 16周的短期随访期间,除标准化毛发摄影图外,还通过摄影、医生和患者的整体评估量表对HR-G进行评估。
使用计算机化毛发摄影图观察到,SG组患者取得了令人满意的结果,在16周后的T1期,目标区域的毛发计数(HC)增加了14根/0.65平方厘米,与基线结果相比(T1期为41±2根/0.65平方厘米,基线期为27±2根/0.65平方厘米)。与CG组HC增加11±2根/0.65平方厘米相比,HR-G存在统计学显著差异(p = 0.0325)。
SG组和CG组的比较表明,就改善HC而言,PEMF联合PBST在HR-G方面是比单独使用PBST更有效的策略。
证据级别III:本期刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据级别。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者指南www.springer.com/00266 。