Suppr超能文献

支架辅助与非支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术治疗破裂颅内动脉瘤的比较分析:一项系统评价与Meta分析

Comparative Analysis of Stent-Assisted Versus Non-Stent-Assisted Coiling in the Management of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Ma Yu-Hu, He Yong-Lin, Zhang Xiao-Yue, Shang Rui, Hu Hai-Tao, Wang Ting, Lin Sen, Pan Ya-Wen, Zhang Chang-Wei

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

出版信息

Transl Stroke Res. 2024 Dec 4. doi: 10.1007/s12975-024-01314-0.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of SAC compared to non-SAC in the treatment of RIA, integrating evidence from high-quality studies to guide clinical practice.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was conducted to compare SAC with coiling alone and BAC in the treatment of RIA. Primary outcomes were immediate and follow-up aneurysm occlusion rates, along with perioperative hemorrhagic and ischemic complication rates.

RESULTS

A total of thirteen retrospective cohort studies were included, comprising 3,086 patients, with 1,078 in the SAC group and 2,008 in the non-SAC group. The immediate complete occlusion rates were similar between the SAC and non-SAC groups (59.1% vs. 61.4%; RR = 1.00; 95% CI [0.94, 1.07]; p = 0.92). However, the SAC group demonstrated a significantly higher long-term complete occlusion rate (61.3% vs. 40.6%; RR = 1.44; 95% CI [1.22, 1.69]; p < 0.001). The incidence of ischemic complications was greater in the SAC group (12.2% vs. 10.0%; RR = 1.68; 95% CI [1.37, 2.07]; p < 0.001), as was the incidence of hemorrhagic complications (7.3% vs. 5.1%; RR = 1.55; 95% CI [1.15, 2.08]; p = 0.004). Perioperative mortality was also elevated in the SAC group (6.7% vs. 6.8%; RR = 1.37; 95% CI [1.00, 1.88]; p = 0.048), with a non-significant trend towards higher long-term mortality (9.8% vs. 9.2%; RR = 1.35; 95% CI [0.98, 1.87]; p = 0.068). Functional outcomes at discharge (76.0% vs. 71.0%; RR = 0.97; 95% CI [0.92, 1.02]; p = 0.237), six months (57.8% vs. 60.8%; RR = 0.93; 95% CI [0.81, 1.07]; p = 0.296), and at the last follow-up (RR = 1.01; 95% CI [0.97, 1.06]; p = 0.592) were comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SAC significantly improves long-term occlusion rates for RIA compared to non-SAC, despite a higher incidence of complications. Careful patient selection and optimization of antiplatelet therapy may enhance the safety and efficacy of SAC for RIA treatment.

摘要

目的

与非弹簧圈辅助栓塞(SAC)相比,系统评价SAC治疗破裂颅内动脉瘤(RIA)的安全性和有效性,整合高质量研究证据以指导临床实践。

方法

进行一项荟萃分析,比较SAC与单纯弹簧圈栓塞及球囊辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗RIA的效果。主要结局指标为即刻及随访时动脉瘤闭塞率,以及围手术期出血和缺血性并发症发生率。

结果

共纳入13项回顾性队列研究,包括3086例患者,其中SAC组1078例,非SAC组2008例。SAC组与非SAC组的即刻完全闭塞率相似(59.1%对61.4%;相对危险度[RR]=1.00;95%可信区间[CI][0.94,1.07];P=0.92)。然而,SAC组的长期完全闭塞率显著更高(61.3%对40.6%;RR=1.44;95%CI[1.22,1.69];P<0.001)。SAC组的缺血性并发症发生率更高(12.2%对10.0%;RR=1.68;95%CI[1.37,2.07];P<0.001),出血性并发症发生率亦更高(7.3%对5.1%;RR=1.55;95%CI[1.15,2.08];P=0.004)。SAC组的围手术期死亡率也有所升高(6.7%对6.8%;RR=1.37;95%CI[1.00,1.88];P=0.048),长期死亡率有升高趋势但无统计学意义(9.8%对9.2%;RR=1.35;95%CI[0.98,1.87];P=0.068)。两组出院时(76.0%对71.0%;RR=0.97;95%CI[0.92,1.02];P=0.237)、6个月时(57.8%对60.8%;RR=0.93;95%CI[0.81,1.07];P=0.296)及末次随访时(RR=1.01;95%CI[0.97,1.06];P=0.592)的功能结局相当。

结论

与非SAC相比,SAC显著提高RIA的长期闭塞率,尽管并发症发生率更高。谨慎选择患者并优化抗血小板治疗可能会提高SAC治疗RIA的安全性和有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验