Sheliga Boris M, FitzGibbon Edmond J, Quaia Christian, Krauzlis Richard J
Laboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
J Vis. 2024 Dec 2;24(13):4. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.13.4.
Manipulations of the strength of visual motion coherence have been widely used to study behavioral and neural mechanisms of visual motion processing. Here, we used a novel broadband visual stimulus to test how the strength of motion coherence in different spatial frequency (SF) bands impacts human ocular-following responses (OFRs). Synthesized broadband stimuli were used: a sum of one-dimensional vertical sine-wave gratings (SWs) whose SFs ranged from 0.0625 to 4 cpd in 0.05-log2(cpd) steps. Every 20 ms a proportion of SWs (from 25% to 100%) shifted in the same direction by ¼ of their respective wavelengths (drifting), whereas the rest of the SWs were assigned a random phase (flicker), shifted by half of their respective wavelengths (counterphase), or remained stationary (static): 25% to 100% motion coherence. As expected, the magnitude of the OFRs decreased as the proportion of non-drifting SWs and/or their contrast increased. The effects, however, were SF dependent. For flicker and static SWs, SFs in the range of 0.3 to 0.6 cpd were the most disruptive, whereas, with counterphase SWs, low SFs were the most disruptive. The data were well fit by a model that combined an excitatory drive determined by a SF-weighted sum of drifting components scaled by a SF-weighted contrast normalization term. Flicker, counterphase, or static SWs did not add to or directly impede the drive in the model, but they contributed to the contrast normalization process.
视觉运动连贯性强度的操控已被广泛用于研究视觉运动处理的行为和神经机制。在此,我们使用了一种新型宽带视觉刺激来测试不同空间频率(SF)频段的运动连贯性强度如何影响人类眼球跟踪反应(OFRs)。使用了合成宽带刺激:一维垂直正弦波光栅(SWs)的总和,其SF范围从0.0625到4 cpd,步长为0.05-log2(cpd)。每20毫秒,一定比例的SWs(从25%到100%)沿相同方向移动其各自波长的四分之一(漂移),而其余的SWs被赋予随机相位(闪烁)、移动其各自波长的一半(反相)或保持静止(静态):运动连贯性为25%到100%。正如预期的那样,随着非漂移SWs的比例和/或其对比度增加,OFRs的幅度降低。然而,这些影响取决于SF。对于闪烁和静态SWs,0.3到0.6 cpd范围内的SF最具干扰性,而对于反相SWs,低SF最具干扰性。数据通过一个模型得到了很好的拟合,该模型结合了由漂移分量的SF加权和乘以SF加权对比度归一化项确定的兴奋性驱动。闪烁、反相或静态SWs在模型中既不增加也不直接阻碍驱动,但它们有助于对比度归一化过程。