Sibanda Mncengeli, Burnett Rosemary J, Godman Brian, Meyer Johanna C
Department of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Ga-Rankuwa, Pretoria, South Africa.
South African Vaccination and Immunisation Centre, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Ga-Rankuwa, Pretoria, South Africa.
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 4;19(12):e0314098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314098. eCollection 2024.
The elderly are particularly prone to complications from a number of vaccine-preventable diseases. However, there are limited data on vaccine uptake for this vulnerable population in South Africa. Consequently, this study investigated influenza, pneumococcal and shingles vaccine uptake among elderly people in South Africa; reasons for their vaccination status; and factors associated with their uptake.
Cross-sectional study using an interviewer-administered questionnaire to survey 985 consenting adults aged ≥65 years in 2018. Participants were recruited from across South Africa. Bivariate analysis was used to identify socio-demographic variables associated with vaccine uptake, with multivariate logistic regression analysis used to identify key factors associated with vaccine uptake.
Influenza vaccine uptake was 32.3% (318/985), with uptake highest in those aged 85-90 years. Pneumococcal and shingles vaccine uptake was 3.8% (37/985) and 0.4% (4/985) respectively, being highest among those aged >90 years. The strongest statistically significant predictors for influenza vaccination were previous influenza vaccination (OR: 8.42 [5.61-12.64]); identifying as 'Coloured' (OR: 8.39 [3.98-17.69]); and residing in Gauteng Province (OR: 5.44 [3.30-9.02]). The strongest statistically significant predictors of receiving pneumococcal vaccination included receiving influenza vaccination (OR = 10.67 [3.27-37.83]); residing in the Western Cape Province (OR: 7.34 [1.49-36.22]); identifying as 'Indian' (OR: 5.85 [2.53-13.55]); and having a university education (OR: 5.56 [1.25-24.77]). Statistically significant barriers to receiving influenza vaccination included following the Traditional African religion (OR: 0.08 [0.01-0.62]) and residing in Limpopo Province (OR: 0.16 [0.04-0.71]). The main reasons for non-vaccination were considering influenza as a mild illness (36.6%; 242/661), and lack of knowledge about the pneumococcal (93.4%; 886/948) and shingles (95.2%; 934/981) vaccines.
Vaccine uptake for all vaccines was sub-optimal, with multiple non-modifiable factors predicting vaccine uptake. These pre-COVID-19 data provide a baseline for measuring the effectiveness of future interventions to increase vaccine uptake and safeguard the health of the elderly.
老年人特别容易因多种疫苗可预防疾病而出现并发症。然而,关于南非这一弱势群体的疫苗接种情况的数据有限。因此,本研究调查了南非老年人的流感、肺炎球菌和带状疱疹疫苗接种情况;他们的疫苗接种状态的原因;以及与接种相关的因素。
2018年采用由访谈员实施的问卷进行横断面研究,对985名年龄≥65岁的同意参与的成年人进行调查。参与者从南非各地招募。采用双变量分析来确定与疫苗接种相关的社会人口统计学变量,采用多变量逻辑回归分析来确定与疫苗接种相关的关键因素。
流感疫苗接种率为32.3%(318/985),在85 - 90岁人群中接种率最高。肺炎球菌和带状疱疹疫苗接种率分别为3.8%(37/985)和0.4%(4/985),在90岁以上人群中最高。流感疫苗接种的最强统计学显著预测因素是之前接种过流感疫苗(比值比:8.42 [5.61 - 12.64]);被认定为“有色人种”(比值比:8.39 [3.98 - 17.69]);以及居住在豪登省(比值比:5.44 [3.30 - 9.02])。接受肺炎球菌疫苗接种的最强统计学显著预测因素包括接种过流感疫苗(比值比 = 10.67 [3.27 - 37.83]);居住在西开普省(比值比:7.34 [1.49 - 36.22]);被认定为“印度人”(比值比:5.85 [2.53 - 13.55]);以及拥有大学学历(比值比:5.56 [1.25 - 24.77])。接受流感疫苗接种的统计学显著障碍包括信奉传统非洲宗教(比值比:0.08 [0.01 - 0.62])和居住在林波波省(比值比:0.16 [0.04 - 0.71])。未接种疫苗的主要原因是认为流感是一种轻症(36.6%;242/661),以及对肺炎球菌(93.4%;886/948)和带状疱疹(95.2%;934/981)疫苗缺乏了解。
所有疫苗的接种率都未达到最佳水平,有多个不可改变的因素预测疫苗接种情况。这些新冠疫情前的数据为衡量未来提高疫苗接种率和保障老年人健康的干预措施的有效性提供了基线。