Jen Wei-Ying, Sasaki Koji, Ravandi Farhad, Kadia Tapan M, Wang Sa A, Wang Wei, Loghavi Sanam, Daver Naval G, DiNardo Courtney D, Issa Ghayas C, Abbas Hussein A, Nasnas Cedric, Bataller Alex, Urrutia Samuel, Karrar Omer S, Pierce Sherry, Kantarjian Hagop M, Short Nicholas J
Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Blood Adv. 2025 Feb 25;9(4):783-792. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013826.
The prognostic impact of measurable residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is unequivocal; however, the optimal time point for achieving undetectable MRD is unclear. We retrospectively studied patients with newly diagnosed (ND) AML who achieved remission with frontline intensive chemotherapy and had MRD assessed by flow cytometry after induction (time point 1 [TP1]) and after cycles 2 or 3 (TP2). Cases were grouped into MRD negative (Neg)/Neg, positive (Pos)/Neg, or Pos/Pos at TP1 and TP2, respectively. Of 1980 patients with ND AML, 277 met the inclusion criteria and were included in this analysis. The median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 73 months, 22 months, and 5 months for the MRD Neg/Neg, Pos/Neg, and Pos/Pos groups, respectively (P < .01). There was a significant difference between the Neg/Neg and Pos/Neg groups (P = .05), suggesting benefit to early MRD negativity. The median overall survival (OS) was 81 months, 40 months, and 9 months, respectively (P < .01), but the difference between Neg/Neg and Pos/Neg was not statistically significant (P = .19). Landmark analysis demonstrated the benefit of stem cell transplant (SCT), particularly in Neg/Neg intermediate-risk AML (median RFS, not reached vs 15 months; P < .01). On multivariable analysis, MRD Pos/Neg was independently associated with a worse RFS than Neg/Neg (hazard ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-2.75; P = .02) but not for OS (P = .15). In conclusion, undetectable flow MRD after induction is associated with better RFS than undetectable MRD achieved later during consolidation. SCT benefited patients with intermediate-risk AML, regardless of MRD kinetics.
可测量残留病(MRD)对急性髓系白血病(AML)的预后影响是明确的;然而,实现不可检测MRD的最佳时间点尚不清楚。我们回顾性研究了新诊断(ND)AML患者,这些患者通过一线强化化疗获得缓解,并在诱导后(时间点1 [TP1])以及第2或3周期后(TP2)通过流式细胞术评估MRD。病例分别在TP1和TP2时分为MRD阴性(Neg)/阴性、阳性(Pos)/阴性或阳性/阳性组。在1980例ND AML患者中,277例符合纳入标准并纳入本分析。MRD阴性/阴性、阳性/阴性和阳性/阳性组的无复发生存期(RFS)中位数分别为73个月、22个月和5个月(P <.01)。阴性/阴性组和阳性/阴性组之间存在显著差异(P =.05),表明早期MRD阴性有益。总生存期(OS)中位数分别为81个月、40个月和9个月(P <.01),但阴性/阴性组和阳性/阴性组之间的差异无统计学意义(P =.19)。标志性分析显示了干细胞移植(SCT)的益处,特别是在阴性/阴性中危AML中(中位RFS,未达到vs 15个月;P <.01)。多变量分析显示,与阴性/阴性组相比,MRD阳性/阴性与更差的RFS独立相关(风险比,1.73;95%置信区间,1.09 - 2.75;P =.02),但与OS无关(P =.15)。总之,诱导后不可检测的流式MRD与巩固期后期实现的不可检测MRD相比,RFS更好。SCT使中危AML患者受益,无论MRD动力学如何。