Rossi Andrea P, Scalfi Luca, Abete Pasquale, Bellelli Giuseppe, Bo Mario, Cherubini Antonio, Corica Francesco, Bari Mauro Di, Maggio Marcello, Rizzo Maria Rosaria, Bianchi Lara, Volpato Stefano, Landi Francesco
Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Healthy Aging Center Treviso, Ospedale Cà Foncello, Treviso, Italy.
Department Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Nutrition. 2025 Mar;131:112627. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2024.112627. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
The COntrolling NUTritional Status (CONUT) score and the Global Nutrition Risk Index (GNRI) are screening tools for assessing the risk of malnutrition based on widely available biochemical parameters. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the predictive value of CONUT and GNRI score on 36 months mortality and hospitalization risk in hospitalized older patients.
Data of 382 patients (196 women, mean age 80.9±6.8 years) were retrieved from the multicenter Italian Study conducted by the Gruppo Lavoro Italiano Sarcopenia-Trattamento e Nutrizione (GLISTEN) in 12 Acute Care Wards. Sarcopenia was defined as presence of low handgrip strength plus low skeletal mass index (EWGSOP2 criteria). CONUT score was calculated based on serum albumin, total cholesterol and total lymphocyte count, whilst the GNRI was calculated using serum albumin and present body weight/ideal body weight ratio.
During the 36-month follow-up, 120 out of 382 participants died (31.4%). From the results of the survival analysis, and after adjustment for potential confounders, participants with CONUT-derived moderate to high risk of malnutrition had shorter survival (HR = 2.67, 95%CI 1.34-5.33 and HR = 3.98, 95% CI: 1.77-8.97, respectively), as well as shorter survival free of urgent hospitalization (HR = 1.91; 95% CI: 1.03-3.55 and HR = 1.98; 95% CI: 1.14-3.42, respectively). Conversely, only GNRI indicative of high risk of malnutrition was an independent predictor of mortality 1.96 (95% CI: 1.06-3.62), but not of hospitalization.
The CONUT score seems a valid tool to predict long-term mortality and hospitalization risk. Conversely, the GNRI is associated with long-term mortality, but not with hospital readmissions.
控制营养状况(CONUT)评分和全球营养风险指数(GNRI)是基于广泛可得的生化参数来评估营养不良风险的筛查工具。本研究的主要目的是调查CONUT和GNRI评分对住院老年患者36个月死亡率和住院风险的预测价值。
从Gruppo Lavoro Italiano Sarcopenia-Trattamento e Nutrizione(GLISTEN)在12个急性护理病房进行的多中心意大利研究中检索了382例患者(196名女性,平均年龄80.9±6.8岁)的数据。肌少症定义为存在低握力加上低骨骼肌质量指数(EWGSOP2标准)。CONUT评分基于血清白蛋白、总胆固醇和总淋巴细胞计数计算,而GNRI使用血清白蛋白和当前体重/理想体重比计算。
在36个月的随访期间,382名参与者中有120人死亡(31.4%)。从生存分析结果来看,在对潜在混杂因素进行调整后,CONUT得出的中度至高度营养不良风险参与者的生存期较短(HR = 2.67,95%CI 1.34 - 5.33和HR = 3.98,95%CI:1.77 - 8.97),无紧急住院的生存期也较短(HR = 1.91;95%CI:1.03 - 3.55和HR = 1.98;95%CI:1.14 - 3.42)。相反,只有表明高度营养不良风险的GNRI是死亡率的独立预测因素,为1.96(95%CI:1.06 - 3.62),但不是住院的预测因素。
CONUT评分似乎是预测长期死亡率和住院风险的有效工具。相反,GNRI与长期死亡率相关,但与再次入院无关。