Söke Nursena Ersoy, Kara Gülsüm, Yardımcı Hülya, Koçer Bilge, Erkoç Ataoğlu Nigar Esra, Tokçaer Bora Hatice Ayşe
Ankara University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Dışkapı Campus Şehit Ömer Halisdemir, Boulevard, Dışkapı, 06110, ANKARA, Turkey.
Ankara University Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Fatih Street. Tepebaşı District, No:197/A, Kecioren, 06300, ANKARA, Turkey.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2025 Aug;137:107890. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2025.107890. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
In elderly patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD), many motor and non-motor symptoms negatively affect nutritional status and increase the risk of malnutrition. It is important to select a screening tool that is objective, rapid, and reliable for the assessment of nutritional status. The aim of this study is to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score indices in determining malnutrition in elderly hospitalised patients with PD by comparing them with the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Long Form (MNA-LF).
The data for the study were collected by the researcher using the face-to-face interview technique. The MNA-Long Form, the GNRI, and the CONUT was calculated.
The study included a total of 94 participants aged between 67 and 78 years. When using CONUT versus MNA-LF, the sensitivity of CONUT was 52.9 % but the specificity was 83.3 %, with a PPV of 90.2 % and a NPV of 37.7 %. When using GNRI versus MNA-LF, the sensitivity of GNRI was 45.7 % but the specificity was 83.3 %, with a PPV of 88.9 % and a NPV of 34.5 %.
Elderly hospitalised patients with Parkinson's Disease, when MNA-LF cannot be used, CONUT, an objective, rapid and practical tool, may be an effective approach to assessing malnutrition.
在老年帕金森病(PD)患者中,许多运动和非运动症状会对营养状况产生负面影响,并增加营养不良的风险。选择一种客观、快速且可靠的筛查工具来评估营养状况非常重要。本研究的目的是通过将老年住院PD患者的老年营养风险指数(GNRI)和控制营养状况(CONUT)评分指数与微型营养评定-长表(MNA-LF)进行比较,来评估它们在确定营养不良方面的敏感性和特异性。
研究数据由研究人员采用面对面访谈技术收集。计算了MNA-长表、GNRI和CONUT。
该研究共纳入94名年龄在67至78岁之间的参与者。当使用CONUT与MNA-LF进行比较时,CONUT的敏感性为52.9%,但特异性为83.3%,阳性预测值为90.2%,阴性预测值为37.7%。当使用GNRI与MNA-LF进行比较时,GNRI的敏感性为45.7%,但特异性为83.3%,阳性预测值为88.9%,阴性预测值为34.5%。
对于老年住院帕金森病患者,当无法使用MNA-LF时,CONUT作为一种客观、快速且实用的工具,可能是评估营养不良的有效方法。