Suppr超能文献

猪尾猕猴主观晶状体偏好与客观屈光不正测量的比较。

Comparison of subjective lens preference to objective refractive error measurements in pigtail macaques.

作者信息

Wesner M F, Young F A

出版信息

Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1986 Mar;63(3):193-7. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198603000-00005.

Abstract

Two measurements can be taken to determine the refractive error in human beings: a subjective, lens preference measurement and objective retinoscopy. This study determined the subjective refractive error in eight pigtailed monkeys by placing lenses of different powers in front of peepholes in a solid wall cage and recording the amount of time each subject used the holes. Retinoscopy measurements were then taken and compared to the subjective findings to determine the degree of similarity between these two refraction methods. The results showed a high correlation between the subjective measurements and the vertical ocular refraction (VOR) and spherical equivalent (SE) (rho = 0.96), further supporting generalizations made from nonhuman primate vision studies to human beings.

摘要

可以通过两种测量方法来确定人类的屈光不正

主观的镜片偏好测量和客观的视网膜检影法。本研究通过在实心壁笼的窥视孔前放置不同屈光度的镜片,并记录每个受试者使用这些孔的时间,来确定八只卷尾猴的主观屈光不正。然后进行视网膜检影测量,并与主观测量结果进行比较,以确定这两种验光方法之间的相似程度。结果表明,主观测量与垂直眼屈光(VOR)和等效球镜度(SE)之间存在高度相关性(rho = 0.96),进一步支持了从非人灵长类动物视觉研究推广到人类的结论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验