Leyendecker Jannik, Mahan Mark, Findlay Matthew C, Prasse Tobias, Köster Malin, Rumswinkel Lena, Shenker Tara, Eysel Peer, Bredow Jan, Zaki Mark M, Konakondla Sanjay, Kashlan Osama N, Derman Peter, Telfeian Albert, Hofstetter Christoph P
University of Washington, Department of Neurological Surgery, Seattle, WA, USA; University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Cologne, Germany.
Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Spine J. 2025 May;25(5):996-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.11.007. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
Unplanned readmission within 30 days following elective spine surgery is a key indicator of quality of care, as readmissions often signal early complications or poor recovery. The Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) utilizes this metric to assess hospital and surgeon performance.
Here we aim to delineate quality of care metrics for full-endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) compared to traditional spine surgery.
The study was a retrospective multicenter analysis comparing outcomes of propensity matched cohorts.
The study included 908 FESS patients operated between 2014 and 2023 and a matched cohort of 73,906 non-FESS patients.
Our primary outcome measures were postoperative 30-day hospital readmissions and revision surgery. Furthermore, demographic data, hospitalization, surgical details and comorbidities were included.
Data were collected from 6 participating institutions. Patients older than 18 years undergoing noninstrumented FESS spine surgeries for degenerative lumbar spinal pathologies from 2016 to 2023 were included. A matched non-FESS cohort was identified in the ACS-NSQIP database (2015-2019). Propensity-score matching was used to compare the cohorts.
Before matching, the 30-day readmission rate was significantly lower in the FESS cohort (1.1% vs 4.4%, p<.001), which remained consistent after matching (1.1% vs 4.5%, p<.001). The rate of 30-day surgical revisions was similar between cohorts (1.0% vs 1.1%, p=.63). Multivariate analysis indicated a significant correlation between FESS and reduced 30-day readmissions (odds ratio [OR] 0.28, 95% CI 0.14-0.57, p<.001).
This study is the first to compare 30-day hospital readmissions between FESS and nonendoscopic surgeries in a large, matched multicenter cohort. FESS significantly reduces both the length of postoperative hospital stay and 30-day readmission rates compared to nonendoscopic approaches, underscoring the safety and effectiveness of outpatient FESS. Future studies are needed to define the role of FESS in more complex spine procedures.
择期脊柱手术后30天内的非计划再入院是医疗质量的关键指标,因为再入院往往预示着早期并发症或恢复不佳。医院再入院率降低计划(HRRP)和医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心(CMS)利用这一指标来评估医院和外科医生的表现。
在此,我们旨在描述与传统脊柱手术相比,全内镜脊柱手术(FESS)的医疗质量指标。
该研究是一项回顾性多中心分析,比较倾向匹配队列的结果。
该研究纳入了2014年至2023年间接受手术的908例FESS患者以及73906例非FESS患者的匹配队列。
我们的主要结局指标是术后30天的医院再入院率和翻修手术。此外,还纳入了人口统计学数据、住院情况、手术细节和合并症。
数据收集自6个参与机构。纳入2016年至2023年间因退行性腰椎疾病接受非器械辅助FESS脊柱手术的18岁以上患者。在ACS-NSQIP数据库(2015 - 2019年)中确定一个匹配的非FESS队列。采用倾向评分匹配来比较队列。
匹配前,FESS队列的30天再入院率显著更低(1.1%对4.4%,p <.001),匹配后仍保持一致(1.1%对4.5%,p <.001)。队列间30天手术翻修率相似(1.0%对1.1%,p =.63)。多变量分析表明FESS与降低的30天再入院率之间存在显著相关性(优势比[OR] 0.28,95%置信区间0.14 - 0.57,p <.001)。
本研究首次在大型、匹配的多中心队列中比较了FESS与非内镜手术的30天医院再入院情况。与非内镜手术方法相比,FESS显著降低了术后住院时间和30天再入院率,突出了门诊FESS的安全性和有效性。未来需要开展研究来明确FESS在更复杂脊柱手术中的作用。