Suppr超能文献

创伤后应激障碍作为一种精神错乱抗辩理由:法医学的困境。

Posttraumatic stress disorder as an insanity defense: medicolegal quicksand.

作者信息

Sparr L F, Atkinson R M

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 1986 May;143(5):608-13. doi: 10.1176/ajp.143.5.608.

Abstract

A growing awareness of posttraumatic stress disorder has led to recent use of the disorder as a legal defense against criminal responsibility for both violent and nonviolent crimes. Diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder is difficult because the symptoms are mostly subjective, often nonspecific, usually well publicized, and, therefore, relatively easy to imitate. Accurate psychiatric testimony in such cases requires diligent searching for collateral sources of information. The authors argue that the insanity defense is appropriate only in the rare instance that a dissociative episode related to posttraumatic stress disorder directly leads to criminal activity.

摘要

对创伤后应激障碍的认识不断提高,导致近来该障碍被用作针对暴力和非暴力犯罪刑事责任的一种法律抗辩。创伤后应激障碍的诊断很困难,因为症状大多是主观的,往往不具特异性,通常广为人知,因此相对容易模仿。在此类案件中,准确的精神病学证词需要认真寻找旁证信息来源。作者认为,只有在与创伤后应激障碍相关的分离性发作直接导致犯罪活动这种罕见情况下,精神错乱抗辩才适用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验