De Crescenzo Franco, De Giorgi Riccardo, Garriga Cesar, Liu Qiang, Fazel Seena, Efthimiou Orestis, Hippisley-Cox Julia, Cipriani Andrea
Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK; and Oxford Health National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK.
Br J Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 5;226(5):1-10. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2024.194.
Antidepressants' effects are established in randomised controlled trials (RCTs), but not in the real world.
To investigate real-world comparative effects of antidepressants for depression and compare them with RCTs.
We performed a cohort study based on the QResearch database. We included people with a newly recorded diagnosis of depression, exposed to licensed antidepressants in the UK. We assessed all-cause dropouts (acceptability), dropouts for adverse events (tolerability), occurrence of at least one adverse event (safety), and response and remission on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 (effectiveness) at 2 and 12 months. Logistic regressions were used to compute adjusted-odds ratio (aOR) with 99% CIs, assessing the associations between exposure to each antidepressant against fluoxetine (comparator) and outcomes of interest. We compared estimates from the real world with RCTs using ratio-of-odds ratio (ROR) with 95% CI.
A total of 673 177 depressed people were studied: females 57.1%, mean age 42.8 (s.d. 17.7) years, mean baseline PHQ-9 17.1 (s.d. 5.0) (moderately severe depression). At 2 months, antidepressant acceptability was 61.4%, tolerability 94.4%, safety 54.5%, PHQ-9 decreased to 12.3 (s.d. 6.5). At 12 months, acceptability was 12.3%, tolerability 87.5%, safety 28.8%, PHQ-9 12.9 (s.d. 6.8). In the short and long term, tricyclics, mirtazapine and trazodone were worse than fluoxetine for most outcomes; citalopram had better acceptability than fluoxetine (aOR 0.95; 99% CI 0.92, 0.97), sertraline had lower tolerability (aOR 1.12; 99% CI 1.06, 1.18), and both citalopram and sertraline had lower safety (aOR 1.17 and 1.25, respectively). In the long term, citalopram had better acceptability (aOR 0.78; 99% CI 0.76, 0.81) and effectiveness (aOR 1.12 for both response and remission), but worse tolerability (aOR 1.09; 99% CI 1.06, 1.13) and safety (aOR 1.12; 99% CI 1.08, 1.16). Observational and randomised data were similar for citalopram and sertraline, while there was some difference for drugs less prescribed in the real world.
Antidepressants showed low acceptability, moderate-to-high tolerability and safety, and small-to-moderate effectiveness in the real world. Real-world and RCT estimates showed similar findings only when the analyses were carried out using large datasets; otherwise, the results diverged.
抗抑郁药的疗效已在随机对照试验(RCT)中得到证实,但在现实世界中并非如此。
研究抗抑郁药治疗抑郁症的真实世界比较疗效,并与随机对照试验进行比较。
我们基于QResearch数据库进行了一项队列研究。纳入在英国新诊断为抑郁症且使用过获批抗抑郁药的患者。我们评估了全因停药率(可接受性)、因不良事件导致的停药率(耐受性)、至少发生一次不良事件的发生率(安全性),以及在2个月和12个月时使用患者健康问卷(PHQ)-9评估的缓解率和治愈率(有效性)。采用逻辑回归计算调整优势比(aOR)及99%置信区间(CI),评估每种抗抑郁药与氟西汀(对照药物)相比的暴露情况与感兴趣的结局之间的关联。我们使用优势比比值(ROR)及95%CI将现实世界的估计值与随机对照试验进行比较。
共研究了673177名抑郁症患者:女性占57.1%,平均年龄42.8岁(标准差17.7),平均基线PHQ-9评分为17.1(标准差5.0)(中度至重度抑郁症)。在2个月时,抗抑郁药的可接受性为61.4%,耐受性为94.4%,安全性为54.5%,PHQ-9降至12.3(标准差6.5)。在12个月时,可接受性为12.3%,耐受性为87.5%,安全性为28.8%,PHQ-9为12.9(标准差6.8)。在短期和长期,对于大多数结局,三环类药物、米氮平和曲唑酮比氟西汀差;西酞普兰的可接受性优于氟西汀(aOR 0.95;99%CI 0.92,0.97),舍曲林的耐受性较低(aOR 1.12;99%CI 1.06,1.18),西酞普兰和舍曲林的安全性均较低(分别为aOR 1.17和1.25)。长期来看,西酞普兰的可接受性较好(aOR 0.78;99%CI 0.76,0.81)且有效性较好(缓解和治愈的aOR均为1.12),但耐受性较差(aOR 1.09;99%CI 1.06,1.13)且安全性较差(aOR 1.12;99%CI 1.08,1.16)。西酞普兰和舍曲林的观察性数据与随机对照试验数据相似,而在现实世界中使用较少的药物则存在一些差异。
在现实世界中,抗抑郁药的可接受性较低,耐受性和安全性为中到高,有效性为小到中等。只有在使用大型数据集进行分析时,现实世界和随机对照试验的估计结果才显示出相似的发现;否则,结果会出现分歧。