• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用大语言模型估计多词表达的特征:具体性、效价、唤醒度。

Using large language models to estimate features of multi-word expressions: Concreteness, valence, arousal.

作者信息

Martínez Gonzalo, Molero Juan Diego, González Sandra, Conde Javier, Brysbaert Marc, Reviriego Pedro

机构信息

Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

ETSI de Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 4;57(1):5. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02515-z.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-024-02515-z
PMID:39633225
Abstract

This study investigates the potential of large language models (LLMs) to provide accurate estimates of concreteness, valence, and arousal for multi-word expressions. Unlike previous artificial intelligence (AI) methods, LLMs can capture the nuanced meanings of multi-word expressions. We systematically evaluated GPT-4o's ability to predict concreteness, valence, and arousal. In Study 1, GPT-4o showed strong correlations with human concreteness ratings (r = .8) for multi-word expressions. In Study 2, these findings were repeated for valence and arousal ratings of individual words, matching or outperforming previous AI models. Studies 3-5 extended the valence and arousal analysis to multi-word expressions and showed good validity of the LLM-generated estimates for these stimuli as well. To help researchers with stimulus selection, we provide datasets with LLM-generated norms of concreteness, valence, and arousal for 126,397 English single words and 63,680 multi-word expressions.

摘要

本研究探讨了大语言模型(LLMs)为多词表达提供具体性、效价和唤醒度准确估计值的潜力。与以往的人工智能(AI)方法不同,大语言模型能够捕捉多词表达的细微含义。我们系统地评估了GPT-4o预测具体性、效价和唤醒度的能力。在研究1中,GPT-4o在多词表达的具体性评级方面与人类评级表现出很强的相关性(r = 0.8)。在研究2中,针对单个单词的效价和唤醒度评级重复了这些发现,与之前的人工智能模型相当或更优。研究3至5将效价和唤醒度分析扩展到多词表达,并表明大语言模型生成的这些刺激估计值也具有良好的效度。为帮助研究人员进行刺激选择,我们提供了包含大语言模型生成的126397个英语单字和63680个多词表达的具体性、效价和唤醒度规范的数据集。

相似文献

1
Using large language models to estimate features of multi-word expressions: Concreteness, valence, arousal.使用大语言模型估计多词表达的特征:具体性、效价、唤醒度。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 4;57(1):5. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02515-z.
2
AI-generated estimates of familiarity, concreteness, valence, and arousal for over 100,000 Spanish words.人工智能对超过10万个西班牙语单词的熟悉度、具体性、效价和唤醒度的估计。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Dec 24:17470218241306694. doi: 10.1177/17470218241306694.
3
Decoding the essence of two-character Chinese words: Unveiling valence, arousal, concreteness, familiarity, and imageability through word norming.解析二字词的本质:通过词频规范揭示词义、情感、具体性、熟悉度和形象度。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):7574-7601. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02437-w. Epub 2024 May 15.
4
Moving beyond word frequency based on tally counting: AI-generated familiarity estimates of words and phrases are an interesting additional index of language knowledge.超越基于计数的词频:人工智能生成的单词和短语熟悉度估计是语言知识的一个有趣的附加指标。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 28;57(1):28. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02561-7.
5
The Nature of Word Associations in Sentence Contexts.句子语境中的词汇联想的本质。
Exp Psychol. 2022 Mar;69(2):104-110. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000547. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
6
English verbs semantic norms database: Concreteness, embodiment, imageability, valence and arousal ratings for 3,500 verbs.英语动词语义规范数据库:3500个动词的具体性、体现性、形象性、效价和唤醒评级
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Apr 23;57(5):153. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02675-6.
7
Norms of valence, arousal, concreteness, familiarity, imageability, and context availability for 1,100 Chinese words.1100个中文词汇的效价、唤醒度、具体性、熟悉度、可想象性和语境可用性规范
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Aug;49(4):1374-1385. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0793-2.
8
Valence, Arousal and Concreteness Mediate Word Association.效价、唤醒度和具体性介导词汇联想。
Psicothema. 2021 Nov;33(4):602-609. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2020.484.
9
Concreteness norms for 1,659 French words: Relationships with other psycholinguistic variables and word recognition times.1,659 个法文字汇的具体性规范:与其他心理语言学变数及字词辨识时间的关系。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Dec;50(6):2366-2387. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1014-y.
10
Can large language models help augment English psycholinguistic datasets?大型语言模型能否帮助扩充英语心理语言学数据集?
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Sep;56(6):6082-6100. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02337-z. Epub 2024 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining Chat GPT with nonwords and machine psycholinguistic techniques.运用非词和机器心理语言学技术对ChatGPT进行研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 6;20(6):e0325612. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325612. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluating the capacity of large language models to interpret emotions in images.评估大语言模型解读图像中情感的能力。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 3;20(6):e0324127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324127. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Statistical Relationships Between Phonological Form, Emotional Valence and Arousal of Spanish Words.西班牙语单词的语音形式、情感效价与唤醒度之间的统计关系
J Cogn. 2024 May 10;7(1):42. doi: 10.5334/joc.366. eCollection 2024.
2
Can large language models help augment English psycholinguistic datasets?大型语言模型能否帮助扩充英语心理语言学数据集?
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Sep;56(6):6082-6100. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02337-z. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
3
Extrapolation of affective norms using transformer-based neural networks and its application to experimental stimuli selection.
基于Transformer 神经网络的情感规范外推及其在实验刺激选择中的应用。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Aug;56(5):4716-4731. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02212-3. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
4
SCOPE: The South Carolina psycholinguistic metabase.范围:南卡罗来纳州心理语言学元数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Sep;55(6):2853-2884. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01934-0. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
5
Concreteness ratings for 62,000 English multiword expressions.62000 个英语多词表达的具体性评级。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Aug;55(5):2522-2531. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01912-6. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
6
Determining the importance of frequency and contextual diversity in the lexical organization of multiword expressions.确定频率和语境多样性在多词表达式词汇组织中的重要性。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2022 Jun;76(2):87-98. doi: 10.1037/cep0000271. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
7
Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research.在线行为研究的平台和面板的数据质量。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Aug;54(4):1643-1662. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01694-3. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
8
Psycholinguistic and affective norms for 1,252 Spanish idiomatic expressions.1,252 个西班牙语惯用表达的心理语言学和情感规范。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 16;16(7):e0254484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254484. eCollection 2021.
9
Affect across adulthood: Evidence from English, Dutch, and Spanish.成年期的情感变化:来自英语、荷兰语和西班牙语的证据。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Apr;150(4):792-812. doi: 10.1037/xge0000950.
10
Normative Data of Dutch Idiomatic Expressions: Subjective Judgments You Can Bank on.荷兰习语表达的规范数据:你可以信赖的主观判断。
Front Psychol. 2019 May 14;10:1075. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01075. eCollection 2019.