• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

范围:南卡罗来纳州心理语言学元数据库。

SCOPE: The South Carolina psycholinguistic metabase.

机构信息

Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Department of Psychology, Institute for Mind and Brain, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29201, USA.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2023 Sep;55(6):2853-2884. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01934-0. Epub 2022 Aug 15.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-022-01934-0
PMID:35971041
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10231664/
Abstract

The number of databases that provide various measurements of lexical properties for psycholinguistic research has increased rapidly in recent years. The proliferation of lexical variables, and the multitude of associated databases, makes the choice, comparison, and standardization of these variables in psycholinguistic research increasingly difficult. Here, we introduce The South Carolina Psycholinguistic Metabase (SCOPE), which is a metabase (or a meta-database) containing an extensive, curated collection of psycholinguistic variable values from major databases. The metabase currently contains 245 lexical variables, organized into seven major categories: General (e.g., frequency), Orthographic (e.g., bigram frequency), Phonological (e.g., phonological uniqueness point), Orth-Phon (e.g., consistency), Semantic (e.g., concreteness), Morphological (e.g., number of morphemes), and Response variables (e.g., lexical decision latency). We hope that SCOPE will become a valuable resource for researchers in psycholinguistics and affiliated disciplines such as cognitive neuroscience of language, computational linguistics, and communication disorders. The availability and ease of use of the metabase with comprehensive set of variables can facilitate the understanding of the unique contribution of each of the variables to word processing, and that of interactions between variables, as well as new insights and development of improved models and theories of word processing. It can also help standardize practice in psycholinguistics. We demonstrate use of the metabase by measuring relationships between variables in multiple ways and testing their individual contribution towards a number of dependent measures, in the most comprehensive analysis of this kind to date. The metabase is freely available at go.sc.edu/scope.

摘要

近年来,提供各种词汇属性测量的数据库数量在医学领域迅速增加。词汇变量的激增,以及与之相关的众多数据库,使得在心理语言学研究中选择、比较和标准化这些变量变得越来越困难。在这里,我们介绍南卡罗来纳心理语言学元数据库(SCOPE),这是一个元数据库(或元数据库),其中包含来自主要数据库的广泛的、经过精心整理的心理语言学变量值集合。该元数据库目前包含 245 个词汇变量,分为七个主要类别:一般(例如,频率)、正字法(例如,双字母频率)、音韵学(例如,音韵独特性点)、正字法-音韵(例如,一致性)、语义(例如,具体性)、形态学(例如,词素数量)和反应变量(例如,词汇判断潜伏期)。我们希望 SCOPE 将成为心理语言学研究人员以及认知神经语言学、计算语言学和言语障碍等相关学科的宝贵资源。元数据库的可用性和易用性,以及其全面的变量集,可以促进对每个变量对单词处理的独特贡献的理解,以及变量之间的相互作用的理解,以及对单词处理的改进模型和理论的新见解和发展。它还可以帮助规范心理语言学的实践。我们通过多种方式测量变量之间的关系,并测试它们对多个因变量的单独贡献,进行了迄今为止最全面的此类分析,展示了元数据库的使用。该元数据库可在 go.sc.edu/scope 免费获得。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e75/10231664/354594346ad9/nihms-1896221-f0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e75/10231664/17ad3567f0a3/nihms-1896221-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e75/10231664/4dce21365df7/nihms-1896221-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e75/10231664/43eadc1e150a/nihms-1896221-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e75/10231664/9d0ea480aae7/nihms-1896221-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e75/10231664/2fa7cf9ede59/nihms-1896221-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e75/10231664/4f50a5db65ae/nihms-1896221-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e75/10231664/2402c2871a8e/nihms-1896221-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e75/10231664/154fb906eabb/nihms-1896221-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e75/10231664/d4d0f9e6b7cb/nihms-1896221-f0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e75/10231664/5cc16903fdca/nihms-1896221-f0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e75/10231664/e3a07a7f541c/nihms-1896221-f0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e75/10231664/354594346ad9/nihms-1896221-f0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e75/10231664/17ad3567f0a3/nihms-1896221-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e75/10231664/4dce21365df7/nihms-1896221-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e75/10231664/43eadc1e150a/nihms-1896221-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e75/10231664/9d0ea480aae7/nihms-1896221-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e75/10231664/2fa7cf9ede59/nihms-1896221-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e75/10231664/4f50a5db65ae/nihms-1896221-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e75/10231664/2402c2871a8e/nihms-1896221-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e75/10231664/154fb906eabb/nihms-1896221-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e75/10231664/d4d0f9e6b7cb/nihms-1896221-f0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e75/10231664/5cc16903fdca/nihms-1896221-f0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e75/10231664/e3a07a7f541c/nihms-1896221-f0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e75/10231664/354594346ad9/nihms-1896221-f0012.jpg

相似文献

1
SCOPE: The South Carolina psycholinguistic metabase.范围:南卡罗来纳州心理语言学元数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Sep;55(6):2853-2884. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01934-0. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
2
Patterns of performance on the animal fluency task in logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia: A reflection of phonological and semantic skills.原发性进行性失语的言语流畅性变异型中动物流畅性任务的表现模式:语音和语义技能的反映。
J Commun Disord. 2024 Mar-Apr;108:106405. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106405. Epub 2024 Jan 21.
3
Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns.意大利语名词的单词命名时间和心理语言学规范。
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2002 Aug;34(3):424-34. doi: 10.3758/bf03195471.
4
Determining the Relativity of Word Meanings Through the Construction of Individualized Models of Semantic Memory.通过构建语义记忆的个体化模型来确定词义的相对性。
Cogn Sci. 2024 Feb;48(2):e13413. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13413.
5
Hong Kong Chinese character psycholinguistic norms: ratings of 4376 single Chinese characters on semantic radical transparency, age-of-acquisition, familiarity, imageability, and concreteness.香港汉字心理语言学规范:4376 个单汉字在语义透明度、习得年龄、熟悉度、形象度和具体度上的评级。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Sep;55(6):2989-3008. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01928-y. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
6
A database of orthography-semantics consistency (OSC) estimates for 15,017 English words.一个包含 15017 个英语单词的正字法-语义一致性(OSC)估计值数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Aug;50(4):1482-1495. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1017-8.
7
Typing pictures: Linguistic processing cascades into finger movements.打字图片:语言处理层叠为手指动作。
Cognition. 2016 Nov;156:16-29. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
8
Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.幸存的盲目分解:复杂单词识别时间进程的分布分析。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Nov;43(11):1793-1820. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000411. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
9
The Auditory English Lexicon Project: A multi-talker, multi-region psycholinguistic database of 10,170 spoken words and nonwords.听觉英语词汇项目:一个包含 10170 个口语词和非词的多说话人、多区域心理语言学数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Oct;52(5):2202-2231. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01352-0.
10
Psycholinguistic norms for more than 300 lexical signs in German Sign Language (DGS).德语手语(DGS)中 300 多个词汇符号的心理语言学规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Oct;53(5):1817-1832. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01524-y. Epub 2021 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The acceptability and validity of AI-generated psycholinguistic stimuli.人工智能生成的心理语言刺激的可接受性和有效性。
Heliyon. 2025 Jan 17;11(2):e42083. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42083. eCollection 2025 Jan 30.
2
Vigorous Exercise Enhances Verbal Fluency Performance in Healthy Young Adults.剧烈运动可提高健康年轻成年人的言语流畅性表现。
Brain Sci. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):96. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15010096.
3
Mapping Mental Representations With Free Associations: A Tutorial Using the R Package associatoR.通过自由联想映射心理表征:使用R包associatoR的教程

本文引用的文献

1
How well imageability, concreteness, perceptual strength, and action strength predict recognition memory, lexical decision, and reading aloud performance.表象能力、具体性、感知强度和动作强度对识别记忆、词汇判断和朗读表现的预测效果如何。
Memory. 2021 May;29(5):622-636. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1924789. Epub 2021 May 10.
2
LexiCAL: A calculator for lexical variables.LexiCAL:词汇变量计算器。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 30;16(4):e0250891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250891. eCollection 2021.
3
Consistency norms for 37,677 english words.
J Cogn. 2025 Jan 6;8(1):3. doi: 10.5334/joc.407. eCollection 2025.
4
Moving beyond word frequency based on tally counting: AI-generated familiarity estimates of words and phrases are an interesting additional index of language knowledge.超越基于计数的词频:人工智能生成的单词和短语熟悉度估计是语言知识的一个有趣的附加指标。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 28;57(1):28. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02561-7.
5
Using large language models to estimate features of multi-word expressions: Concreteness, valence, arousal.使用大语言模型估计多词表达的特征:具体性、效价、唤醒度。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 4;57(1):5. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02515-z.
6
The Two Word Test as a semantic benchmark for large language models.双词测试作为大语言模型的语义基准。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 16;14(1):21593. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72528-3.
7
Novel embeddings improve the prediction of risk perception.新型嵌入改进了风险感知的预测。
EPJ Data Sci. 2024;13(1):38. doi: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-024-00478-x. Epub 2024 May 22.
8
An inclusive multivariate approach to neural localization of language components.一种包容的多变量方法,用于语言成分的神经定位。
Brain Struct Funct. 2024 Jun;229(5):1243-1263. doi: 10.1007/s00429-024-02800-9. Epub 2024 May 2.
9
A psycholinguistic study of intergroup bias and its cultural propagation.群体间偏见及其文化传播的心理语言学研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 14;14(1):8613. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58905-y.
10
Non-arbitrary mappings between size and sound of English words: Form typicality effects during lexical access and memory.英语单词大小与发音之间的非任意映射:词汇通达和记忆过程中的形式典型性效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 May;77(5):943-963. doi: 10.1177/17470218231184940. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
一致性规范,适用于 37677 个英文单词。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Dec;52(6):2535-2555. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01391-7.
4
LexOPS: An R package and user interface for the controlled generation of word stimuli.LexOPS:一个用于受控生成单词刺激的 R 包和用户界面。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Dec;52(6):2372-2382. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01389-1.
5
The Auditory English Lexicon Project: A multi-talker, multi-region psycholinguistic database of 10,170 spoken words and nonwords.听觉英语词汇项目:一个包含 10170 个口语词和非词的多说话人、多区域心理语言学数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Oct;52(5):2202-2231. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01352-0.
6
The Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms: multidimensional measures of perceptual and action strength for 40,000 English words.兰开斯特感觉运动规范:40000 个英语单词的感知和动作强度的多维测量
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Jun;52(3):1271-1291. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01316-z.
7
Recognition times for 62 thousand English words: Data from the English Crowdsourcing Project.识别 62000 个英语单词所需的时间:来自英语众包项目的数据。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Apr;52(2):741-760. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01272-8.
8
English semantic feature production norms: An extended database of 4436 concepts.英文语义特征产生规范:一个扩展的包含 4436 个概念的数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Aug;51(4):1849-1863. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01243-z.
9
Quantifying sensorimotor experience: Body-object interaction ratings for more than 9,000 English words.量化感觉运动体验:9000 多个英语单词的身体-物体相互作用评级。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):453-466. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1171-z.
10
The "Small World of Words" English word association norms for over 12,000 cue words.《“小世界字词”英语单词联想范式 12000 余条》。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Jun;51(3):987-1006. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1115-7.