Alamin Tomas, Lin-Martore Margaret, Kornblith Aaron E, O'Donnell Aidan, Gragalia Sally
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco, CA USA.
Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, CA USA.
POCUS J. 2024 Nov 15;9(2):102-108. doi: 10.24908/pocus.v9i2.17550. eCollection 2024.
Foot and ankle injuries are a common presenting complaint to the Emergency Department (ED) and are often assessed with plain radiography. Rural environments may not have access to radiography mandating the referral or transfer patients to regional centers for definitive diagnosis. The Ottawa Foot and Ankle Rules (OFAR) is a clinical decision rule that can assist in ruling out fractures. Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) can augment this decision rule. The objective of this study was to assess both the feasibility and test characteristics of a previously described POCUS augmented clinical assessment, OFAR-POCUS, for adolescent and adult patients with foot and ankle pain in a rural environment. This was a prospective cohort study from June to August 2022 including patients with chief complaint of foot or ankle injury presenting to a rural clinic. Patients were included if they had positive finding(s) on the OFAR Test and required radiographic imaging. Patients were excluded if they did not consent, speak English, were unable to be scanned, had obvious joint deformities, had altered mental status, were not physiologically stable, had other injuries preventing sonography, were pregnant, or had previous injury with internal fixation, osteomyelitis, or rheumatoid arthritis. POCUS was performed before transport for radiography. POCUS examiners were POCUS novices who underwent a one and a half to two-hour, standardized foot and ankle POCUS training session. All POCUS studies were reviewed by two emergency medicine ultrasound fellowship trained faculty for quality assurance. Standard test characteristics were calculated for bedside clinician and expert POCUS interpretations compared to the radiographic control. Thirteen POCUS examiners performed exams on 20 patients included in analysis; four patients had fractures on radiograph (20%). The bedside clinician POCUS interpretation had sensitivity (SN) = 100% (95% Cl, 40%-100%), specificity (SP) =94% (95% Cl, 70%-100%), and negative likelihood ratio (-LR) = 16.00 (95% Cl, 2.40-106.73). Expert POCUS interpretation had SN=75% (95% Cl, 19%-99%), SP=75% (95% Cl, 48%-93%), and -LR=0.33 (95% Cl, 0.06-1.86). A POCUS enhanced clinical strategy for clinically significant foot and ankle fractures in adolescent and adult patients in a rural setting is feasible. Larger studies are required to further characterize test characteristics and use of foot and ankle POCUS where plain radiography is unavailable.
足踝部损伤是急诊科常见的就诊主诉,通常通过X线平片进行评估。农村地区可能无法进行X线检查,因此需要将患者转诊或转送至区域中心进行明确诊断。渥太华足踝部规则(OFAR)是一种临床决策规则,可帮助排除骨折。床旁超声(POCUS)可以辅助这一决策规则。本研究的目的是评估先前描述的POCUS增强临床评估(OFAR-POCUS)在农村环境中对青少年和成年足踝部疼痛患者的可行性和检测特征。这是一项前瞻性队列研究,时间为2022年6月至8月,纳入了因足踝部损伤为主诉前来农村诊所就诊的患者。如果患者在OFAR测试中有阳性发现且需要进行影像学检查,则纳入研究。如果患者不同意、不会说英语、无法进行扫描、有明显的关节畸形、精神状态改变、生理不稳定、有其他损伤妨碍超声检查、怀孕或有既往内固定损伤、骨髓炎或类风湿关节炎,则排除在外。在转运进行X线检查之前进行POCUS检查。POCUS检查人员是POCUS新手,他们接受了1.5至2小时的标准化足踝部POCUS培训课程。所有POCUS研究均由两名接受过急诊医学超声 fellowship培训的教员进行质量保证审查。将床旁临床医生和专家对POCUS的解读与X线对照进行比较,计算标准检测特征。13名POCUS检查人员对纳入分析的20名患者进行了检查;4名患者X线检查显示骨折(20%)。床旁临床医生对POCUS的解读敏感性(SN)=100%(95%可信区间,40%-100%),特异性(SP)=94%(95%可信区间,70%-100%),阴性似然比(-LR)=16.00(95%可信区间,2.40-106.73)。专家对POCUS的解读SN=75%(95%可信区间,19%-99%),SP=75%(95%可信区间,48%-93%),-LR=0.33(95%可信区间,0.06-1.86)。在农村环境中,针对青少年和成年患者临床上显著的足踝部骨折,采用POCUS增强临床策略是可行的。需要进行更大规模的研究,以进一步明确检测特征以及在无法进行X线平片检查时足踝部POCUS的应用情况。