Suppr超能文献

乙状结肠扭转急诊乙状结肠切除术后一期吻合与造口:三级转诊中心58年经验

Primary anastomosis versus stoma following urgent sigmoidectomy for sigmoid volvulus: 58-year experience in a tertiary referral center.

作者信息

Agirman Enes, Disci Esra, Peksoz Rifat, Atamanalp Sabri Selcuk

机构信息

Enes Agirman, MD. Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, Erzurum City Hospital, Erzurum, Turkiye.

Esra Disc, MD. Associate Professor, Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkiye.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Dec;40(11):2513-2517. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.11.10543.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Primary anastomosis and stoma are the main options in the restoration of intestinal continuity following urgent sigmoidectomy in sigmoid volvulus (SV). Our purpose was to evaluate the outcomes of both techniques in a 1,083-patient SV series.

METHODS

Total 1,083 cases with SV treated in Ataturk University Research Hospital in 58-year period between June 1966 and July 2024 were included in this study. We reviewed the records of 612 patients (56.5%) retrospectively, while the remaining 471 cases (43.5%) were evaluated prospectively. We investigated some preoperative, operative, and postoperative characteristics in non-matched analyses.

RESULTS

Among total 379 patients treated with urgent colectomy, primary anastomosis was used in 173 cases (45.6%), while stoma was required in 206 patients (54.4%). The mean age was significantly lower in primary anastomosis group (P<0.005), while male/female ratios were statistically similar (P>0.05). Mean ASA score (P<0.001) and rates of shock (P<0.001), bowel gangrene (P<0.001), bowel perforation (P<0.01), and risky bowel (P<0.005) were also significantly lower in the primary anastomosis group. When stoma closure was considered, operation time was significantly shorter (P<0.001), additionally, morbidity and mortality rates were significantly lower in the primary anastomosis group (P<0.001, in each). The distributions of reoperation rates were statistically similar in both groups (P>0.05). Conversely, hospitalization time was significantly shorter and cost was significantly lower in the primary anastomosis group (P<0.001, in each).

CONCLUSION

Primary anastomosis has some advantages in comparison to stoma in the restoration of intestinal continuity following urgent sigmoidectomy in SV. However, stoma is generally preferred in patients with bad health status, old age, and risky bowel. New prospective randomized clinical studies or matched analyses may help to clarify the optimal choice.

摘要

目的

在乙状结肠扭转(SV)患者行急诊乙状结肠切除术后,一期吻合和造口是恢复肠道连续性的主要选择。我们的目的是评估在一个包含1083例患者的SV系列中这两种技术的治疗效果。

方法

本研究纳入了1966年6月至2024年7月期间在阿塔图尔克大学研究医院接受治疗的1083例SV患者。我们回顾性分析了612例患者(56.5%)的记录,其余471例患者(43.5%)进行前瞻性评估。我们在非配对分析中研究了一些术前、术中及术后特征。

结果

在总共379例行急诊结肠切除术的患者中,173例(45.6%)采用一期吻合,206例(54.4%)需要造口。一期吻合组患者的平均年龄显著更低(P<0.005),而男女比例在统计学上相似(P>0.05)。一期吻合组的平均ASA评分(P<0.001)、休克发生率(P<0.001)、肠坏死发生率(P<0.001)、肠穿孔发生率(P<0.01)及高危肠发生率(P<0.005)也显著更低。考虑造口关闭时,一期吻合组的手术时间显著更短(P<0.001),此外,一期吻合组的发病率和死亡率也显著更低(均为P<0.001)。两组再次手术率的分布在统计学上相似(P>0.05)。相反,一期吻合组的住院时间显著更短,费用显著更低(均为P<0.001)。

结论

在SV患者行急诊乙状结肠切除术后恢复肠道连续性方面,一期吻合与造口相比具有一些优势。然而,对于健康状况差、年龄较大及存在高危肠的患者,通常更倾向于选择造口。新的前瞻性随机临床研究或配对分析可能有助于明确最佳选择。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Volvulus of the gastrointestinal tract.
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2024 Mar 2;85(3):1-9. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2023.0295. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
5
WSES consensus guidelines on sigmoid volvulus management.WSES 关于乙状结肠扭转管理的共识指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2023 May 15;18(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00502-x.
6
Factors affecting recurrence in sigmoid volvulus.影响乙状结肠扭转复发的因素。
Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Jan-Feb;39(1):150-153. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.1.6882.
7
Sigmoid Volvulus and Ileosigmoid Knotting: An Update.乙状结肠扭转与回乙状结肠扭结:最新进展
Eurasian J Med. 2022 Dec;54(Suppl1):91-96. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.22310.
8
Endoscopic Decompression of Sigmoid Volvulus: Review of 748 Patients.内镜下乙状结肠扭转减压术:748 例患者回顾。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 Jul;32(7):763-767. doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0613. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
9
Hartmann's at 100: Relevant or redundant?哈特曼氏溶液100年:相关还是多余?
Curr Probl Surg. 2021 Aug;58(8):100951. doi: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2020.100951. Epub 2020 Dec 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验