• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跟随目光：注视与语法正确性。

Follow the eyes: gaze and grammaticality.

作者信息

Hunyadi Laszlo

机构信息

Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 15;15:1415590. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1415590. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1415590
PMID:39635708
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11616449/
Abstract

This paper studies the role of eye tracking in detecting grammatical violation in reading tasks. It tests the assumption that encountering syntactic violation has its correspondence in the behavioral patterns associated with gazing. Applying the offered by the research environment , it is shown that the observation of grammaticality/agrammaticality in samples of experiments is reflected in the partial correlation of these categories across a number of structural patterns. It is however also shown that their expected difference in the total duration of focusing is not confirmed. It is suggested that associating eye tracking with an additional sound recording or with linguistic ERP studies could widen the categorical spectrum of identifying grammatical violations.

摘要

本文研究了眼动追踪在阅读任务中检测语法错误方面的作用。它检验了这样一种假设，即遇到句法错误在与注视相关的行为模式中存在对应关系。运用研究环境所提供的[具体内容缺失]，结果表明，实验样本中语法性/非语法性的观察结果反映在这些类别在多种结构模式中的偏相关性上。然而，研究还表明，它们在注视总时长方面预期的差异并未得到证实。研究建议，将眼动追踪与额外的声音记录或语言事件相关电位研究相结合，可能会拓宽识别语法错误的类别范围。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/400d55fcf89e/fpsyg-15-1415590-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/d0cc97019231/fpsyg-15-1415590-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/cf4a07d5933d/fpsyg-15-1415590-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/6f2f490039d3/fpsyg-15-1415590-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/62d75216428a/fpsyg-15-1415590-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/c932ddf9446a/fpsyg-15-1415590-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/20a9d51041f4/fpsyg-15-1415590-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/e3aff0fa06db/fpsyg-15-1415590-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/6b637a3ba3ee/fpsyg-15-1415590-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/cb3dc35c1e0e/fpsyg-15-1415590-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/e8b234d09ed8/fpsyg-15-1415590-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/8f00ad1d3be9/fpsyg-15-1415590-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/30cf25c7ff7b/fpsyg-15-1415590-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/1da756917317/fpsyg-15-1415590-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/400d55fcf89e/fpsyg-15-1415590-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/d0cc97019231/fpsyg-15-1415590-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/cf4a07d5933d/fpsyg-15-1415590-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/6f2f490039d3/fpsyg-15-1415590-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/62d75216428a/fpsyg-15-1415590-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/c932ddf9446a/fpsyg-15-1415590-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/20a9d51041f4/fpsyg-15-1415590-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/e3aff0fa06db/fpsyg-15-1415590-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/6b637a3ba3ee/fpsyg-15-1415590-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/cb3dc35c1e0e/fpsyg-15-1415590-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/e8b234d09ed8/fpsyg-15-1415590-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/8f00ad1d3be9/fpsyg-15-1415590-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/30cf25c7ff7b/fpsyg-15-1415590-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/1da756917317/fpsyg-15-1415590-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e01/11616449/400d55fcf89e/fpsyg-15-1415590-g014.jpg

相似文献

1
Follow the eyes: gaze and grammaticality.跟随目光：注视与语法正确性。
Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 15;15:1415590. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1415590. eCollection 2024.
2
Processing Prescriptively Incorrect Comparative Particles: Evidence From Sentence-Matching and Eye-Tracking.处理规定性错误的比较级词：来自句子匹配和眼动追踪的证据。
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 14;11:186. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00186. eCollection 2020.
3
Memory effects in syntactic ERP tasks.句法事件相关电位任务中的记忆效应。
Brain Cogn. 2004 Jul;55(2):392-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.056.
4
Grammaticality judgments and reading skill in grade 2.语法判断与二年级的阅读技能。
Ann Dyslexia. 1988 Jan;38(1):73-94. doi: 10.1007/BF02648249.
5
Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.句子理解过程中句法与语义的相互作用：句法和语义违反相结合的事件相关电位效应
J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Aug 15;15(6):883-99. doi: 10.1162/089892903322370807.
6
Emotional face recognition in male adolescents with autism spectrum disorder or disruptive behavior disorder: an eye-tracking study.自闭症谱系障碍或破坏性行为障碍男性青少年的情绪面孔识别：一项眼动研究。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018 Sep;27(9):1143-1157. doi: 10.1007/s00787-018-1174-4. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
7
Long-term written language experience affects grammaticality judgements and usage but not priming of spoken sentences.长期的书面语言经验会影响语法判断和使用，但不会影响口语句子的启动。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Aug;74(8):1378-1395. doi: 10.1177/17470218211005228. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
8
Grammatical predictions in Spanish-English bilinguals and Spanish-language learners.西班牙语-英语双语者和西班牙语学习者的语法预测。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 May;46(5):907-925. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000764. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
9
Cue strength in second-language processing: an eye-tracking study.第二语言加工中的线索强度：一项眼动追踪研究。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(3):568-84. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.961934. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
10
Who did Buzz see someone? Grammaticality judgement of wh-questions in typically developing children and children with Grammatical-SLI.巴斯看到了谁？发育正常儿童和患有语法特定语言障碍儿童对特殊疑问句的语法判断。
Lingua. 2011 Feb;121(3):408-422. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.10.007.

本文引用的文献

1
Editorial: Eye-tracking while reading for psycholinguistic and computational models of language comprehension.社论：阅读过程中的眼动追踪用于语言理解的心理语言学和计算模型
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 28;14:1326408. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1326408. eCollection 2023.
2
Not all grammar errors are equally noticed: error detection of naturally occurring errors and implications for eye-tracking models of everyday texts.并非所有语法错误都会被同等程度地注意到：自然出现的错误的错误检测以及对日常文本眼动追踪模型的启示。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 13;14:1124227. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1124227. eCollection 2023.
3
The effects of attention and task-relevance on the processing of syntactic violations during listening to two concurrent speech streams.
在同时听两个语音流时，注意力和任务相关性对句法违规处理的影响。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Oct;18(5):932-948. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0614-4.
4
Neurophysiology of Hungarian subject-verb dependencies with varying intervening complexity.匈牙利语主谓依赖关系的神经生理学：不同的介入复杂度。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2011 Dec;82(3):207-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.06.010. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
5
Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing.迈向听觉句子处理的神经基础。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Feb 1;6(2):78-84. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01839-8.
6
Event-related brain potential studies in language.语言方面的事件相关脑电位研究。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2004 Nov;4(6):466-70. doi: 10.1007/s11910-004-0070-0.
7
The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?语言能力：它是什么，谁拥有它，以及它是如何进化的？
Science. 2002 Nov 22;298(5598):1569-79. doi: 10.1126/science.298.5598.1569.
8
Concerning the automaticity of syntactic processing.关于句法处理的自动性。
Psychophysiology. 1999 Jan;36(1):126-37. doi: 10.1017/s004857729997155x.