• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于临床试验风险监测的QTL及二级限值阈值的有效定位

Efficient Positioning of QTL and Secondary Limit Thresholds in a Clinical Trial Risk-Based Monitoring.

作者信息

Shnaydman Vladimir

机构信息

ORBee Consulting, 57 East Bluff Rd., Ashland, MA, 01721, USA.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Jan;59(1):173-183. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00722-6. Epub 2024 Dec 5.

DOI:10.1007/s43441-024-00722-6
PMID:39636370
Abstract

In the high-stakes world of clinical trials, where a company's multimillion-dollar drug development investment is at risk, the increasing complexity of these trials only compounds the challenges. Therefore, the development of a robust risk mitigation strategy, as a crucial component of comprehensive risk planning, is not just important but essential for effective drug development, particularly in the RBQM (Risk-Based Quality Management) ecosystem and its component-RBM (Risk-Based Monitoring). This emphasis on the urgency and significance of risk mitigation strategy can help the audience understand the gravity of the topic. The paper introduces a novel modeling framework for deriving an efficient risk mitigation strategy at the planning stage of a clinical trial and establishing operational rules (thresholds) under the assumption that contingency resources are limited. The problem is solved in two steps: (1) Deriving a contingency budget and its efficient allocation across risks to be mitigated and (2) Deriving operational rules to be aligned with risk assessment and contingency resources. This approach is based on combining optimization and simulation models. The optimization model aims to derive an efficient contingency budget and allocate limited mitigation resources across mitigated risks. The simulation model aims to efficiently position each risk's QTL/KRI (Quality Tolerance Limits/Key Risk Indicators at a clinical trial level) and Secondary Limit thresholds. A case study illustrates the proposed technique's practical application and effectiveness. This example demonstrates the framework's potential and instills confidence in its successful implementation, reassuring the audience of its practicality and usefulness. The paper is structured as follows. (1) Introduction; (2) Methodology; (3) Models-Risk Optimizer and Risk Simulator; (4) Case study; (5) Discussion and (6) Conclusion.

摘要

在临床试验这个高风险的领域中,公司数百万美元的药物研发投资面临风险,而这些试验日益增加的复杂性只会使挑战更加复杂。因此,制定强有力的风险缓解策略作为全面风险规划的关键组成部分,对于有效的药物研发而言不仅重要而且必不可少,尤其是在基于风险的质量管理(RBQM)生态系统及其组成部分——基于风险的监测(RBM)中。对风险缓解策略的紧迫性和重要性的这种强调有助于读者理解该主题的重要性。本文介绍了一种新颖的建模框架,用于在临床试验的规划阶段得出有效的风险缓解策略,并在应急资源有限的假设下建立操作规则(阈值)。该问题分两步解决:(1)得出应急预算及其在要缓解的风险之间的有效分配;(2)得出与风险评估和应急资源相一致的操作规则。这种方法基于优化模型和模拟模型的结合。优化模型旨在得出有效的应急预算,并在已缓解的风险之间分配有限的缓解资源。模拟模型旨在有效地确定每个风险的质量容忍限度/关键风险指标(在临床试验层面)以及次要限度阈值。一个案例研究说明了所提出技术的实际应用和有效性。这个例子展示了该框架的潜力,并使其成功实施令人信服,让读者放心其实用性和有用性。本文结构如下:(1)引言;(2)方法;(3)模型——风险优化器和风险模拟器;(4)案例研究;(5)讨论;(6)结论。

相似文献

1
Efficient Positioning of QTL and Secondary Limit Thresholds in a Clinical Trial Risk-Based Monitoring.基于临床试验风险监测的QTL及二级限值阈值的有效定位
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Jan;59(1):173-183. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00722-6. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
2
Efficient Risk Mitigation Planning for a Clinical Trial.临床试验的高效风险缓解计划。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Jul;57(4):717-727. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00521-5. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
3
Risk-Based Quality Management: A Case for Centralized Monitoring.基于风险的质量管理:集中监测案例
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Mar;59(2):199-210. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00719-1. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
4
Comprehensive Assessment of Risk-Based Quality Management Adoption in Clinical Trials.基于风险的质量管理在临床试验中的采用情况综合评估
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 May;58(3):520-527. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00618-5. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
5
Risk-Based Monitoring in Clinical Trials: Increased Adoption Throughout 2020.临床试验中的基于风险的监测:2020 年全面采用。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 May;56(3):415-422. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00387-z. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
6
Risk-Based Monitoring in Clinical Trials: 2021 Update.临床试验中的基于风险的监测:2021 更新。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 May;57(3):529-537. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00496-9. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
7
Optimizing Quality Tolerance Limits Monitoring in Clinical Trials Through Machine Learning Methods.通过机器学习方法优化临床试验中的质量公差限度监测
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 May;59(3):566-578. doi: 10.1007/s43441-025-00754-6. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
8
Adoption Maturity Model for Risk-based Quality Management (RBQM) in Clinical Trials.临床试验中基于风险的质量管理(RBQM)的采用成熟度模型。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 May;59(3):549-557. doi: 10.1007/s43441-025-00746-6. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
9
Developing an efficient scheduling template of a chemotherapy treatment unit: A case study.制定化疗治疗单元的高效排班模板:一项案例研究。
Australas Med J. 2011;4(10):575-88. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2011.837. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
10
Implementation of equity in resource allocation for regional earthquake risk mitigation using two-stage stochastic programming.使用两阶段随机规划实现区域地震风险缓解资源分配的公平性。
Risk Anal. 2015 Mar;35(3):434-58. doi: 10.1111/risa.12321. Epub 2015 Feb 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality Tolerance Limits: A General Guidance for Parameter Selection and Threshold Setting.质量公差限:参数选择和阈值设定的一般指南。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 May;58(3):423-430. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00617-6. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
2
An Overview of Current Statistical Methods for Implementing Quality Tolerance Limits.现行质量公差限实施统计方法概述。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 Mar;58(2):273-284. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00598-y. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
3
Efficient Risk Mitigation Planning for a Clinical Trial.临床试验的高效风险缓解计划。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Jul;57(4):717-727. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00521-5. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
4
Quality Tolerance Limits' Place in the Quality Management System and Link to the Statistical Trial Design: Case Studies and Recommendations from Early Adopters.质量公差限在质量管理体系中的位置及其与统计试验设计的联系:早期采用者的案例研究和建议。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Jul;57(4):839-848. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00504-6. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
5
Historical Benchmarks for Quality Tolerance Limits Parameters in Clinical Trials.临床试验中质量公差限参数的历史基准。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Nov;55(6):1265-1273. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00335-3. Epub 2021 Aug 27.