Zolfaghari Mohammad R, Peyghaleh Elnaz
Civil Engineering Department, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran, 15875-4416.
Risk Anal. 2015 Mar;35(3):434-58. doi: 10.1111/risa.12321. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
This article presents a new methodology to implement the concept of equity in regional earthquake risk mitigation programs using an optimization framework. It presents a framework that could be used by decisionmakers (government and authorities) to structure budget allocation strategy toward different seismic risk mitigation measures, i.e., structural retrofitting for different building structural types in different locations and planning horizons. A two-stage stochastic model is developed here to seek optimal mitigation measures based on minimizing mitigation expenditures, reconstruction expenditures, and especially large losses in highly seismically active countries. To consider fairness in the distribution of financial resources among different groups of people, the equity concept is incorporated using constraints in model formulation. These constraints limit inequity to the user-defined level to achieve the equity-efficiency tradeoff in the decision-making process. To present practical application of the proposed model, it is applied to a pilot area in Tehran, the capital city of Iran. Building stocks, structural vulnerability functions, and regional seismic hazard characteristics are incorporated to compile a probabilistic seismic risk model for the pilot area. Results illustrate the variation of mitigation expenditures by location and structural type for buildings. These expenditures are sensitive to the amount of available budget and equity consideration for the constant risk aversion. Most significantly, equity is more easily achieved if the budget is unlimited. Conversely, increasing equity where the budget is limited decreases the efficiency. The risk-return tradeoff, equity-reconstruction expenditures tradeoff, and variation of per-capita expected earthquake loss in different income classes are also presented.
本文提出了一种新方法,利用优化框架在区域地震风险缓解计划中实现公平概念。它提出了一个框架,决策者(政府和当局)可利用该框架构建针对不同地震风险缓解措施的预算分配策略,即在不同地点和规划期内针对不同建筑结构类型进行结构加固。本文开发了一个两阶段随机模型,以基于最小化缓解支出、重建支出,特别是在地震高度活跃国家的重大损失来寻求最优缓解措施。为了考虑不同人群之间财政资源分配的公平性,在模型制定中通过约束条件纳入了公平概念。这些约束条件将不公平限制在用户定义的水平,以在决策过程中实现公平与效率的权衡。为了展示所提出模型的实际应用,将其应用于伊朗首都德黑兰的一个试点地区。纳入建筑存量、结构脆弱性函数和区域地震危险性特征,为试点地区编制概率地震风险模型。结果说明了不同位置和建筑结构类型的缓解支出变化。这些支出对可用预算金额和恒定风险厌恶下的公平考虑很敏感。最重要的是,如果预算不受限制,公平更容易实现。相反,在预算有限的情况下增加公平性会降低效率。还展示了风险与回报的权衡、公平与重建支出的权衡以及不同收入阶层人均预期地震损失的变化。