Cano Manuel, Jones Abenaa, Silverstein Sydney M, Daniulaityte Raminta, LoVecchio Frank
School of Social Work, Arizona State University, 411 N Central Ave Suite 863, Phoenix, AZ 85004, United States.
The Department of Human Development and Family Studies, The Consortium on Substance Use and Addiction, The Pennsylvania State University, 218 Health and Human Development Building, University Park, PA 16802, United States.
Int J Drug Policy. 2025 Jan;135:104678. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104678. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
In consideration of rising opioid-stimulant deaths in the United States, this study explored rates of naloxone administration and survival in suspected opioid overdoses with, versus without, stimulants co-involved.
The study analyzed 26,635 suspected opioid-involved overdoses recorded by law enforcement/first-responders in the Pennsylvania Overdose Information Network in 63 Pennsylvania counties, January 2018-July 2024. All measures, including suspected drug involvement, were based on first-responder assessment/report. Relative frequencies and chi-square tests were first used to compare suspected opioid overdoses with, versus without, stimulants (cocaine or methamphetamine) co-involved. Next, mediation analyses tested naloxone administration as a mediator in the association between stimulant co-involvement (in opioid overdoses) and survival.
Naloxone was reportedly administered in 72.2 % of the suspected opioid-no-cocaine overdoses, compared to 55.1 % of the opioid-cocaine-involved overdoses, and 72.1 % of the opioid-no-methamphetamine overdoses vs. 52.4 % of the opioid-methamphetamine-involved overdoses. With respect to survival rates, 18.0 % of the suspected opioid-no-cocaine overdoses ended in death, compared to 41.3 % of the opioid-cocaine overdoses; 18.1 % of the opioid-no-methamphetamine overdoses ended in death, versus 42.9 % of the opioid-methamphetamine overdoses. In mediation analyses (adjusted for demographics, county, year, and other drug co-involvement), naloxone administration mediated 38.7 % (95 % Confidence Interval [CI], 31.3-46.0 %) of the association between suspected cocaine co-involvement and survival and 39.2 % (95 % CI, 31.3-47.1 %) of the association between suspected methamphetamine co-involvement and survival.
Among suspected opioid overdoses recorded in the Pennsylvania Overdose Information Network, stimulant co-involvement was associated with lower naloxone administration and higher fatality, with naloxone partially mediating the association between stimulant co-involvement and death.
鉴于美国阿片类药物与兴奋剂联用导致的死亡人数不断上升,本研究探讨了在疑似阿片类药物过量使用事件中,有兴奋剂共同参与和无兴奋剂共同参与情况下纳洛酮的使用比例及生存率。
本研究分析了2018年1月至2024年7月宾夕法尼亚州63个县的宾夕法尼亚过量用药信息网络中执法人员/急救人员记录的26,635起疑似阿片类药物过量使用事件。所有指标,包括疑似药物参与情况,均基于急救人员的评估/报告。首先使用相对频率和卡方检验来比较有兴奋剂(可卡因或甲基苯丙胺)共同参与和无兴奋剂共同参与的疑似阿片类药物过量使用事件。接下来,进行中介分析,以检验纳洛酮的使用是否为兴奋剂共同参与(在阿片类药物过量使用事件中)与生存率之间关联的中介因素。
据报告,在无可卡因共同参与的疑似阿片类药物过量使用事件中,72.2%使用了纳洛酮;在有可卡因共同参与的阿片类药物过量使用事件中,这一比例为55.1%;在无甲基苯丙胺共同参与的阿片类药物过量使用事件中,72.1%使用了纳洛酮,而在有甲基苯丙胺共同参与的阿片类药物过量使用事件中,这一比例为52.4%。关于生存率,无可卡因共同参与的疑似阿片类药物过量使用事件中,18.0%以死亡告终;有可卡因共同参与的阿片类药物过量使用事件中,这一比例为41.3%;无甲基苯丙胺共同参与的阿片类药物过量使用事件中,18.1%以死亡告终;有甲基苯丙胺共同参与的阿片类药物过量使用事件中,这一比例为42.9%。在中介分析中(根据人口统计学、县、年份和其他药物共同参与情况进行调整),纳洛酮的使用在疑似可卡因共同参与与生存率之间的关联中起到了38.7%(95%置信区间[CI],31.3 - 46.0%)的中介作用,在疑似甲基苯丙胺共同参与与生存率之间的关联中起到了39.2%(95%CI,31.3 - 47.1%)的中介作用。
在宾夕法尼亚过量用药信息网络记录的疑似阿片类药物过量使用事件中,兴奋剂共同参与与纳洛酮使用比例较低和死亡率较高相关,纳洛酮部分介导了兴奋剂共同参与与死亡之间的关联。