Huang Jiexin, Huang Jiagu, Ding Haiqi, Lyu Jianhua, Huang Changyu, Chen Yang, Wang Qijin, Li Hongyan, Wu Baijian, Huang Ying, Yang Minghui, Fang Xinyu, Zhang Wenming
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Regional Medical Center, Binhai Campus of the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Orthop Surg. 2025 Feb;17(2):470-481. doi: 10.1111/os.14303. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
Following failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric fractures (FIF-ITF), the decision to use a long-stem or standard-stem femoral implant in hip arthroplasty is still debated. This study aimed to explore how the healing status of fractures after FIF-ITF failure affects the choice of femoral stem and clinical outcomes.
Our retrospective cohort study reviewed 105 cases of patients with FIF-ITF who underwent hip arthroplasty at three tertiary Grade A hospitals between December 2012 and December 2022. We compared the clinical outcomes between patients with healed and unhealed fractures, focusing on the selection of femoral stems in relation to proximal medial support and the healing status of the greater trochanter. The primary outcomes measured were functional results, operative time, blood loss, and incidence of complications. A subgroup analysis was conducted to further evaluate the influence of the proximal medial buttress and greater trochanteric healing on femoral stem selection. Statistical analysis included binary and ordinal logistic regression to identify factors influencing the choice of femoral stems. Additionally, a decision tree model was developed to visually represent and explore the relationship between fracture healing status and the selection of femoral components.
The study included 38 patients with healed fractures and 67 patients with unhealed fractures. Patients in the healed group predominantly chose standard stems and experienced better functional outcomes (p < 0.001, p = 0.002). In contrast, the unhealed group preferred long stems, resulting in longer surgical durations and increased blood loss (p = 0.008, p < 0.001). Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that nonunion of the proximal femoral medial buttress was an independent risk factor for long stems (p < 0.0001, OR = 10.402).
The selection of femoral prostheses following FIF-ITF is influenced by the fracture healing status, particularly the presence of proximal femoral medial buttress. The decision tree model suggested that long-stem prostheses are more appropriate when there is inadequate fracture healing and the proximal femoral medial buttress is absent.
在股骨转子间骨折内固定失败(FIF-ITF)后,髋关节置换术中使用长柄或标准柄股骨植入物的决策仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨FIF-ITF失败后骨折的愈合状态如何影响股骨干的选择及临床结果。
我们的回顾性队列研究回顾了2012年12月至2022年12月期间在三家三级甲等医院接受髋关节置换术的105例FIF-ITF患者。我们比较了骨折愈合和未愈合患者的临床结果,重点关注与近端内侧支撑相关的股骨干选择以及大转子的愈合状态。测量的主要结果包括功能结果、手术时间、失血量和并发症发生率。进行亚组分析以进一步评估近端内侧支撑和大转子愈合对股骨干选择的影响。统计分析包括二元和有序逻辑回归,以确定影响股骨干选择的因素。此外,还开发了一个决策树模型,以直观地表示和探讨骨折愈合状态与股骨组件选择之间的关系。
该研究包括38例骨折愈合患者和67例骨折未愈合患者。愈合组患者主要选择标准柄,功能结果更好(p < 0.001,p = 0.002)。相比之下,未愈合组更喜欢长柄,导致手术时间更长和失血量增加(p = 0.008,p < 0.001)。二元逻辑回归分析显示,股骨近端内侧支撑不愈合是选择长柄的独立危险因素(p < 0.0001,OR = 10.402)。
FIF-ITF后股骨假体的选择受骨折愈合状态的影响,尤其是股骨近端内侧支撑的情况。决策树模型表明,当骨折愈合不足且股骨近端内侧支撑缺失时,长柄假体更合适。